Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post

And you were both wrong.
Just like your wrong thinking JMM beat Manny Pacquiao ? that was technically a loss right ? i couldn't think of anyother examples by the way.
Yes officially Pacster won.

The difference is - the MAJORITY think Marquez beat Pacster, like the HUGE MAJORITY think Calzaghe beat Hopkins.

So I'm right in both cases. Fact.
No thats actually called an opinion, not a fact. We are both technically not wrong for thinking Bernard Hopkins beat Joe Calzaghe.

Because in a close fight when debating the scoring no one is wrong, because people see boxing in different ways.

Just like your opinion in thinking JMM beating Manny Pacquiao, isn't right or wrong. And just because more people thought JMM won. Doesn't make you right either.

Because alot of people thought Manny Pacquiao won, based on the knockdown and because he done more damage to JMM, and he was taking the fight to JMM.

I don't personally share that opinion but that doesn't make it wrong either does it ?

Quite alot of people on this forum believe Bernard Hopkins beat Joe Calzaghe. Including me and i haven't really ever seen any legit reason's.

Why people think Joe Calzaghe won other than workrate, BK proved my point that most of Joe Calzaghe's punches were ineffective.

So if thats the case why should he win just based on workrate ? this isn't amateur scoring.