Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 76

Thread: Lets get something straight!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    In all honesty all that matters to me now is PAC winning his 7th weight div championship, I don't care who he fights catch weight or not. I just want him to make history to be the first boxer to do so.
    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    In all honesty all that matters to me now is PAC winning his 7th weight div championship, I don't care who he fights catch weight or not. I just want him to make history to be the first boxer to do so.
    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.
    Wrong.

    Is Freddie Roach now deciding what the Welterweight limit should be?

    It will not be a 7th weight div. championship because none exist at 145.

    Fact

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,605
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3974
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    In all honesty all that matters to me now is PAC winning his 7th weight div championship, I don't care who he fights catch weight or not. I just want him to make history to be the first boxer to do so.
    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.
    Well since all you Pac fans think Manny walks on water, and since you're so confident in your man's abilities, then you should have no problem with him fighting for that 7th title at 147.

    If Manny beats Cotto at 147, I'll have absolutely no problem giving him credit for it, but when Cotto beats Manny, will you Pac fans be able to do the same, without whining?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1181
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    In all honesty all that matters to me now is PAC winning his 7th weight div championship, I don't care who he fights catch weight or not. I just want him to make history to be the first boxer to do so.
    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.
    Well since all you Pac fans think Manny walks on water, and since you're so confident in your man's abilities, then you should have no problem with him fighting for that 7th title at 147.

    If Manny beats Cotto at 147, I'll have absolutely no problem giving him credit for it, but when Cotto beats Manny, will you Pac fans be able to do the same, without whining?
    we're not whining and do not think PAC walks on water Ma'am.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    968
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Alright, maybe Cotto should agree to a catch weight of 146 1/2 pounds on the scale for the welterweight titles. I say that's a pretty fair catch weight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1020
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    In all honesty all that matters to me now is PAC winning his 7th weight div championship, I don't care who he fights catch weight or not. I just want him to make history to be the first boxer to do so.
    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.
    Well since all you Pac fans think Manny walks on water, and since you're so confident in your man's abilities, then you should have no problem with him fighting for that 7th title at 147.

    If Manny beats Cotto at 147, I'll have absolutely no problem giving him credit for it, but when Cotto beats Manny, will you Pac fans be able to do the same, without whining?
    If Cotto wins he'll get credit, just as if Pac wins he'll get credit. This stuff about the weight is just nonsense.....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post

    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.
    Well since all you Pac fans think Manny walks on water, and since you're so confident in your man's abilities, then you should have no problem with him fighting for that 7th title at 147.

    If Manny beats Cotto at 147, I'll have absolutely no problem giving him credit for it, but when Cotto beats Manny, will you Pac fans be able to do the same, without whining?
    If Cotto wins he'll get credit, just as if Pac wins he'll get credit. This stuff about the weight is just nonsense.....
    unless you're the one struggling to cut weight.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
    In all honesty all that matters to me now is PAC winning his 7th weight div championship, I don't care who he fights catch weight or not. I just want him to make history to be the first boxer to do so.
    your right man, forget these babies whining. history wont hear them at all but that 7th weight div title will be told loudly.
    Well since all you Pac fans think Manny walks on water, and since you're so confident in your man's abilities, then you should have no problem with him fighting for that 7th title at 147.

    If Manny beats Cotto at 147, I'll have absolutely no problem giving him credit for it, but when Cotto beats Manny, will you Pac fans be able to do the same, without whining?
    REally diane? really? i know when others resort to comments like that they are offended somehow. But yes i do think pac has a good chance even at 147. What do you think pacs chances are at a catchweight? do you think its a sealed win? i didnt think so.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4427
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    If a champ agrees to it then a title can be on the line at a catchweight. Just like in the past fighters have agreed to a catchweight to put two division titles on the line.

    Come on guys this isnt the first time its going to happen.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    If a champ agrees to it then a title can be on the line at a catchweight. Just like in the past fighters have agreed to a catchweight to put two division titles on the line.

    Come on guys this isnt the first time its going to happen.
    Hello? McFly!

    Governing Body?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4427
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    If a champ agrees to it then a title can be on the line at a catchweight. Just like in the past fighters have agreed to a catchweight to put two division titles on the line.

    Come on guys this isnt the first time its going to happen.
    Those were just as much if not more BS than this. I would never endorse multiple weight titles in the same fight it doesn't make any sense. Yes it has happened, but it shouldn't have. For example, how can you justify fighting for a middleweight title at 164 lbs. Do boxers now have carte blanche to determine what weightclasses are? If that's the case why have weight classes at all?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    If a champ agrees to it then a title can be on the line at a catchweight. Just like in the past fighters have agreed to a catchweight to put two division titles on the line.

    Come on guys this isnt the first time its going to happen.
    Those were just as much if not more BS than this. I would never endorse multiple weight titles in the same fight it doesn't make any sense. Yes it has happened, but it shouldn't have. For example, how can you justify fighting for a middleweight title at 164 lbs. Do boxers now have carte blanche to determine what weightclasses are? If that's the case why have weight classes at all?
    they do it to match two great fighters up and the titles are additional hype jobs. you know how boxing goes killa.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    968
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    If a champ agrees to it then a title can be on the line at a catchweight. Just like in the past fighters have agreed to a catchweight to put two division titles on the line.

    Come on guys this isnt the first time its going to happen.
    Ray Leonard pull that bitchass move on Lalonde for his Lightheavyweight title at 168. And De La Hoya the 2nd golden boy had Hopkins come in at 158 at age 39 for his middleweight titles. Both are punks for pulling those moves.

    Ray Leonard who is a poor man's version of the original Sugar Ray tried to emulate the original by taking on the lightheavyweight champ, but all he did was pissed off real boxing fans with that weight drain shit.

    Pacman will alienate and piss off many boxing fans, he may fool the fan boys and the general public, but real boxing fans he won't.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4427
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lets get something straight!

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Catchweights should not be for titles period. The belt is for fighters that can make 141-147 at the weigh-in. The 145 limit is not the Welterweight limit and therefore should not be for the WELTERWEIGHT title. If Cotto and PAC want to fight at a catchweight fine, but you cannot justify it being for a title other than you want your boy to get his 7th div title. If PAC wants a 7th division title fight someone within the limits of the seventh division, not some made-up limit.
    If a champ agrees to it then a title can be on the line at a catchweight. Just like in the past fighters have agreed to a catchweight to put two division titles on the line.

    Come on guys this isnt the first time its going to happen.
    Ray Leonard pull that bitchass move on Lalonde for his Lightheavyweight title at 168. And De La Hoya the 2nd golden boy had Hopkins come in at 158 at age 39 for his middleweight titles. Both are punks for pulling those moves.

    Ray Leonard who is a poor man's version of the original Sugar Ray tried to emulate the original by taking on the lightheavyweight champ, but all he did was pissed off real boxing fans with that weight drain shit.

    Pacman will alienate and piss off many boxing fans, he may fool the fan boys and the general public, but real boxing fans he won't.
    Valid points about Leonard and ODLH, but don't say Julius isn't a real boxing fan. Julius is a stand up guy, we can keep this debate civil.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Straight Right Hand
    By ThomasTabin in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 09-14-2014, 05:41 PM
  2. right cross/straight right
    By cocobeware in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 05:55 PM
  3. I got the snap on my straight right!!!!!
    By killersheep in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-19-2007, 03:21 AM
  4. So let me get this straight..............
    By CutMeMick in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-13-2006, 08:26 AM
  5. LETS GET SOMETHING STRAIGHT, ZAB JUDAH DID NOT HIT ROGER
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 09:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing