Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 50

Thread: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Cotto fought the best out there. The speculation on whether or nor Margarito used handwraps in that fight will always be there.

    Cotto is a warrior, he got into a ring with a guy suspected of using illegal handwraps and he got into the ring with a guy known to be a HGH user.

    HGH makes you just as good as you are in your athletic prime and in many cases better than you are in your athletic prime.

    Mosley used the same sort of illegal drugs that Barry Bonds used. Barry Bonds was better in his late 30s using HGH than when he was natural and in his athletic prime, the same thing also applies to Roger Clemens.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1149
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Cotto fought the best out there. The speculation on whether or nor Margarito used handwraps in that fight will always be there.

    Cotto is a warrior, he got into a ring with a guy suspected of using illegal handwraps and he got into the ring with a guy known to be a HGH user.

    HGH makes you just as good as you are in your athletic prime and in many cases better than you are in your athletic prime.

    Mosley used the same sort of illegal drugs that Barry Bonds used. Barry Bonds was better in his late 30s using HGH than when he was natural and in his athletic prime, the same thing also applies to Roger Clemens.
    Enough with the mosley "cheated" bullshit...even the opponent in which he supposedly "used" them against, says he believes mosley to be innocent...on top of that, Mosley has never been fined or penalized for any wrong doing.
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Cotto fought the best out there. The speculation on whether or nor Margarito used handwraps in that fight will always be there.

    Cotto is a warrior, he got into a ring with a guy suspected of using illegal handwraps and he got into the ring with a guy known to be a HGH user.

    HGH makes you just as good as you are in your athletic prime and in many cases better than you are in your athletic prime.

    Mosley used the same sort of illegal drugs that Barry Bonds used. Barry Bonds was better in his late 30s using HGH than when he was natural and in his athletic prime, the same thing also applies to Roger Clemens.
    Enough with the mosley "cheated" bullshit...even the opponent in which he supposedly "used" them against, says he believes mosley to be innocent...on top of that, Mosley has never been fined or penalized for any wrong doing.
    HGH is virtually undetectable by piss tests. Bonds, Clemens, Petitite weren't penalized for using HGH in baseball, that doesn't mean they did not cheat. HGH not only brings back your prime, but in many cases makes you faster, stronger, more durable than when you are in your physical prime.

    If Mosley is so good and better than that certain opponent (De La Hoya) that he was accused of doping against, then why not try and beat him fair and square?

    Mosley is no better than Margarito. They are one and the same.

    And what are you Mosley Publicist?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1149
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Cotto fought the best out there. The speculation on whether or nor Margarito used handwraps in that fight will always be there.

    Cotto is a warrior, he got into a ring with a guy suspected of using illegal handwraps and he got into the ring with a guy known to be a HGH user.

    HGH makes you just as good as you are in your athletic prime and in many cases better than you are in your athletic prime.

    Mosley used the same sort of illegal drugs that Barry Bonds used. Barry Bonds was better in his late 30s using HGH than when he was natural and in his athletic prime, the same thing also applies to Roger Clemens.
    Enough with the mosley "cheated" bullshit...even the opponent in which he supposedly "used" them against, says he believes mosley to be innocent...on top of that, Mosley has never been fined or penalized for any wrong doing.
    HGH is virtually undetectable by piss tests. Bonds, Clemens, Petitite weren't penalized for using HGH in baseball, that doesn't mean they did not cheat. HGH not only brings back your prime, but in many cases makes you faster, stronger, more durable than when you are in your physical prime.

    If Mosley is so good and better than that certain opponent (De La Hoya) that he was accused of doping against, then why not try and beat him fair and square?

    Mosley is no better than Margarito. They are one and the same.

    And what are you Mosley Publicist?
    Mosley supposedly used them in the second fight...he clearly beat de la hoya in the first fight. What I don't understand is if the man he "used" them against believes him to be innocent of wrong doing, why are you trying to make a case against him? I don't remember Oscar demanding a fair and square rematch or going public about it..oh wait he did go public..stating that he knows mosley and believes that he wouldn't cheat. So let it go dude.
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post

    Enough with the mosley "cheated" bullshit...even the opponent in which he supposedly "used" them against, says he believes mosley to be innocent...on top of that, Mosley has never been fined or penalized for any wrong doing.
    HGH is virtually undetectable by piss tests. Bonds, Clemens, Petitite weren't penalized for using HGH in baseball, that doesn't mean they did not cheat. HGH not only brings back your prime, but in many cases makes you faster, stronger, more durable than when you are in your physical prime.

    If Mosley is so good and better than that certain opponent (De La Hoya) that he was accused of doping against, then why not try and beat him fair and square?

    Mosley is no better than Margarito. They are one and the same.

    And what are you Mosley Publicist?
    Mosley supposedly used them in the second fight...he clearly beat de la hoya in the first fight. What I don't understand is if the man he "used" them against believes him to be innocent of wrong doing, why are you trying to make a case against him? I don't remember Oscar demanding a fair and square rematch or going public about it..oh wait he did go public..stating that he knows mosley and believes that he wouldn't cheat. So let it go dude.
    For one thing if De La Hoya went out and didn't act or pretend to act all gracious it hurts his public image. There is a reason why he's called the "golden boy". the image the guy has to lived up to.

    And it's not supposedly, Mosley admitted to a grand jury that was prosecuting the Balco Labs that he used HGH. It's not "supposedly".
    Actually his bullshit excuse just like many other athletes that got caught doping was, "I didn't know what I was taking." That's the same bullshit excuse that when an athlete gets caught cheating is, "I didn't know." Same thing with Margarito using the excuse, "I didn't know my trainer did that to my wraps." Sounds familiar?

    And HGH makes you stronger, faster, it increases your stamina, why do you think so many athletes use it? If Mosley is so much better than De La Hoya, why use it?

    And one last thing, the guys that uses HGH are actually just as good in their late 30s or early 40s like they were in their physical prime.

    It's kind of funny that a guy like Shane Mosley is just as fast, strong, durable, and has great stamina just like in his twenties. Shit we all know the reason.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1149
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post

    HGH is virtually undetectable by piss tests. Bonds, Clemens, Petitite weren't penalized for using HGH in baseball, that doesn't mean they did not cheat. HGH not only brings back your prime, but in many cases makes you faster, stronger, more durable than when you are in your physical prime.

    If Mosley is so good and better than that certain opponent (De La Hoya) that he was accused of doping against, then why not try and beat him fair and square?

    Mosley is no better than Margarito. They are one and the same.

    And what are you Mosley Publicist?
    Mosley supposedly used them in the second fight...he clearly beat de la hoya in the first fight. What I don't understand is if the man he "used" them against believes him to be innocent of wrong doing, why are you trying to make a case against him? I don't remember Oscar demanding a fair and square rematch or going public about it..oh wait he did go public..stating that he knows mosley and believes that he wouldn't cheat. So let it go dude.
    For one thing if De La Hoya went out and didn't act or pretend to act all gracious it hurts his public image. There is a reason why he's called the "golden boy". the image the guy has to lived up to.

    And it's not supposedly, Mosley admitted to a grand jury that was prosecuting the Balco Labs that he used HGH. It's not "supposedly".
    Actually his bullshit excuse just like many other athletes that got caught doping was, "I didn't know what I was taking." That's the same bullshit excuse that when an athlete gets caught cheating is, "I didn't know." Same thing with Margarito using the excuse, "I didn't know my trainer did that to my wraps." Sounds familiar?

    And HGH makes you stronger, faster, it increases your stamina, why do you think so many athletes use it? If Mosley is so much better than De La Hoya, why use it?

    And one last thing, the guys that uses HGH are actually just as good in their late 30s or early 40s like they were in their physical prime.

    It's kind of funny that a guy like Shane Mosley is just as fast, strong, durable, and has great stamina just like in his twenties. Shit we all know the reason.

    You must've never seen mosley in his twenties? because he's no where near that fast. And he only seems to have the stamina because he doesn't move as much as he used to. He's a veteran now that basically stands and trades.

    If the grand jury and athletic commission felt shane was innocent what's your point? Why keep calling him a willing cheater? Because the fight decision wasn't overturned, and neither was the margo win over cotto so you and everyone else that wants to make excuse as to why cotto got his ass sandblasted can keep reaching because isn't going to change a thing. Cotto got blasted plain and simple and after manny possibly knocks his ass out then the excuse will be something new.
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post

    Mosley supposedly used them in the second fight...he clearly beat de la hoya in the first fight. What I don't understand is if the man he "used" them against believes him to be innocent of wrong doing, why are you trying to make a case against him? I don't remember Oscar demanding a fair and square rematch or going public about it..oh wait he did go public..stating that he knows mosley and believes that he wouldn't cheat. So let it go dude.
    For one thing if De La Hoya went out and didn't act or pretend to act all gracious it hurts his public image. There is a reason why he's called the "golden boy". the image the guy has to lived up to.

    And it's not supposedly, Mosley admitted to a grand jury that was prosecuting the Balco Labs that he used HGH. It's not "supposedly".
    Actually his bullshit excuse just like many other athletes that got caught doping was, "I didn't know what I was taking." That's the same bullshit excuse that when an athlete gets caught cheating is, "I didn't know." Same thing with Margarito using the excuse, "I didn't know my trainer did that to my wraps." Sounds familiar?

    And HGH makes you stronger, faster, it increases your stamina, why do you think so many athletes use it? If Mosley is so much better than De La Hoya, why use it?

    And one last thing, the guys that uses HGH are actually just as good in their late 30s or early 40s like they were in their physical prime.

    It's kind of funny that a guy like Shane Mosley is just as fast, strong, durable, and has great stamina just like in his twenties. Shit we all know the reason.

    You must've never seen mosley in his twenties? because he's no where near that fast. And he only seems to have the stamina because he doesn't move as much as he used to. He's a veteran now that basically stands and trades.

    If the grand jury and athletic commission felt shane was innocent what's your point? Why keep calling him a willing cheater? Because the fight decision wasn't overturned, and neither was the margo win over cotto so you and everyone else that wants to make excuse as to why cotto got his ass sandblasted can keep reaching because isn't going to change a thing. Cotto got blasted plain and simple and after manny possibly knocks his ass out then the excuse will be something new.
    How the hell can you be innocent from cheating when you admit to using HGH? lol Actually it's "unknowingly." If Shane Mosley is innocent than Margarito should be innocent too right? He wasn't prosecuted from the feds because he didn't lie to them like Barry Bonds. But best believe he would have been prosecuted if he lied to them.

    I've watched Mosley since he beat Phillip Holiday for the lightweight title in the 90s. And it looks like he's still just as fast, strong, better than when he was in his prime. It's HGH.

    In the history of boxing almost every boxer was shot or on the serious decline at Shane Mosley's age, with the exception of Hopkins, but he uses his craftiness more than anything.

    In fact name me one boxer in the history of the game that was just as strong, fast, sharp, and conditioned in his late 30s as he was in his 20s?
    Can you do it?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2285
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post

    HGH is virtually undetectable by piss tests. Bonds, Clemens, Petitite weren't penalized for using HGH in baseball, that doesn't mean they did not cheat. HGH not only brings back your prime, but in many cases makes you faster, stronger, more durable than when you are in your physical prime.

    If Mosley is so good and better than that certain opponent (De La Hoya) that he was accused of doping against, then why not try and beat him fair and square?

    Mosley is no better than Margarito. They are one and the same.

    And what are you Mosley Publicist?
    Human Growth Hormone does not bring back ones prime.
    It merely induces a state of growth that allows the body to grow in mass and strength.

    Shane Mosley in search of bigger purses, made the jump from Lightweight to Welterweight, bypassing the 140lb duivsion.
    To help him do so, Mosley sought out BALCO. A pharmecutical company which had been affiliated with the success of other athletes such as Evander Holyfield and Marion Jones.
    At this time Balco were seen to be a perfectly legitimate supplementation company which also came highly advised by Mosley's strength and conditioining coach.

    Mosley underwent a course of "boosters" from BALCO before the ODLH fight.
    To the best of Mosley's knowledge he was being administered "revolutionary" new supplements that would help him forge a legacy in the Welterweight division.
    In reality BALCO injected Shane with HGH "the cream and the clear."

    Upon testing Shane strongly denied accusations and even went as far as to file defamation claims. Investigations were ongoing, Mosley vehemently denied steroid usage.

    When suited with the results Shane held his hands up and admitted that these substances were indeed found.
    He then filed a suit against BALCO.


    Shane utilised BALCO's products to gain size, hardly a massive injustice as he would have gained very little in terms of performance other than the bulk of a man at 147.

    Shane to this day is injecting supplementation, although now I believe he is more guarded and utilises primarily anti-oxidants.
    091

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1406
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Fuk all the BALCO talk.

    Cotto is good but Mosley is better. Yeah I know Mosley lost but IMO he fought the wrong fight; He was suprised by Cotto's boxing ability.

    Cotto was on the back foot by the end of the fight. Forget he's excuses for why. The real reasons became apparent in the Margarito and Clottey fights.

    Cotto isn't quite the warrior he'd have us all believe.

    Mosley would K.O cotto in a Re-match.

    Also, for the sake of this argument, id LOVE to see how Cotto handled a PRIME Dela Hoya at 147
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1322
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by holmcall View Post
    Because he slaughtered the guy who butchered the guy who beat him, but he did this MOST RECENTLY. My guess is Mosley is fresher than Cotto and that's why I have have him ranked higher--that and the fact I saw Margo's ghost in his fight with Clottey.
    Yea, but Cotto beat Clottey even more recently and he beat Mosley. Plus, Mosley looked mediocre in his win over Mayorga, which was the fight before Margarito.

    Either way you cut it Cotto has taken on every single fighter out there. How anyone could not say Cotto is a warrior is beyond me.

    Mosley is ranked above Cotto because Mosley beat Margarito. I can get that: Margarito was ranked number one and Mosley beat the number one guy. That said, Cotto beat Mosley, the current number one, and beat Clottey, the current number three.

    If I'm getting everyone's points, everyone would agree that if Cotto rematched Margarito and beat him, he unequivocally would be ranked number one. Correct? And what if he beats Manny?
    Last edited by Rantcatrat; 07-01-2009 at 10:28 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2285
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Yea, but Cotto beat Clottey even more recently and he beat Mosley. Plus, Mosley looked mediocre in his win over Mayorga, which was the fight before Margarito.

    Either way you cut it Cotto has taken on every single fighter out there. How anyone could not say Cotto is a warrior is beyond me.

    Mosley is ranked above Cotto because Mosley beat Margarito. I can get that: Margarito was ranked number one and Mosley beat the number one guy. That said, Cotto beat Mosley, the current number one, and beat Clottey, the current number three.

    If I'm getting everyone's points, everyone would agree that if Cotto rematched Margarito and beat him, he unequivocally would be ranked number one. Correct? And what if he beats Manny?
    All Cotto has to do is fight Mosley again...simple as.
    091

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1356
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimboogie View Post
    Fuk all the BALCO talk.

    Cotto is good but Mosley is better. Yeah I know Mosley lost but IMO he fought the wrong fight; He was suprised by Cotto's boxing ability.

    Cotto was on the back foot by the end of the fight. Forget he's excuses for why. The real reasons became apparent in the Margarito and Clottey fights.

    Cotto isn't quite the warrior he'd have us all believe.

    Mosley would K.O cotto in a Re-match.

    Also, for the sake of this argument, id LOVE to see how Cotto handled a PRIME Dela Hoya at 147
    yea cause only a pussy would fight on for 9 rnds with a gash like this one



    or this one


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1515
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    How is Cotto not a warrior? Also he outboxed Mosley early on in their fight, and he landed some big punches off the back foot, I don't think anyone believes Cotto is the most durable guy on the planet, but he's one of the toughest.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1717
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimboogie View Post
    Fuk all the BALCO talk.

    Cotto is good but Mosley is better. Yeah I know Mosley lost but IMO he fought the wrong fight; He was suprised by Cotto's boxing ability.

    Cotto was on the back foot by the end of the fight. Forget he's excuses for why. The real reasons became apparent in the Margarito and Clottey fights.

    Cotto isn't quite the warrior he'd have us all believe.

    Mosley would K.O cotto in a Re-match.

    Also, for the sake of this argument, id LOVE to see how Cotto handled a PRIME Dela Hoya at 147
    yea cause only a pussy would fight on for 9 rnds with a gash like this one



    or this one

    Re-read the context JimBoogie put it in. He at no point suggested he was a pussy, just that he's not a warrior in the JCC mold. I may not agree with him, but that's no reason to overreact & exaggerate his point

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is Mosley ranked higher than Cotto at welterweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimboogie View Post
    Fuk all the BALCO talk.

    Cotto is good but Mosley is better. Yeah I know Mosley lost but IMO he fought the wrong fight; He was suprised by Cotto's boxing ability.

    Cotto was on the back foot by the end of the fight. Forget he's excuses for why. The real reasons became apparent in the Margarito and Clottey fights.

    Cotto isn't quite the warrior he'd have us all believe.

    Mosley would K.O cotto in a Re-match.

    Also, for the sake of this argument, id LOVE to see how Cotto handled a PRIME Dela Hoya at 147
    Margarito and Clottey are huge guys for fighting in the welterweight division.

    Anyone can get caught with a good shot and get taken out. It doesn't make them less of a fighter.

    Mosley could get knocked out the same as Cotto in a re-match. Mosley was slowing in that fight with Margarito take another look. I'd give Cotto the upper hand from the middle rounds if they ever faced off again.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 07:30 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-21-2007, 09:09 AM
  3. Cotto v Mosley
    By Dark Lord Al in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-24-2007, 05:09 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 04:31 PM
  5. COTTO VS. URKAL FOR THE WBA WELTERWEIGHT TITLE!!!
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-23-2006, 02:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing