Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 82

Thread: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    I always get a kick out of the fact that up until being destroyed by Manny Hatton "Was" eLITE....

    aFTER THE mANNY BEATDOW HE SUDDENLY BECOMES A CLUB FIGHTER IN PEOPLES EYES....

    Just like,,,,(pre handwrap issue).....Margarito was nothing more then a club fighter til he beat Cotto......

    Can't be both ways....

    Hatton was elite, he beat big names in the WW and JWW divisions, he was the man at 140 til he lost to Manny....Hatton was in no way a second rate fighter

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Sanchez, Julio, Lucero, Barrera 2, Morales 2, Larios, Solis, Marquez, Hatton, DLH.......

    Pretty damn good resume....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1385
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Sanchez, Julio, Lucero, Barrera 2, Morales 2, Larios, Solis, Marquez, Hatton, DLH.......

    Pretty damn good resume....
    Those are the pros but the cons are

    Couldnt beat Sanchez

    Got knocked out by Torrencampo

    Got knocked out by Singursat

    Got beaten by a washed up Morales who was coming off a loss to Barrera

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,805
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Think of it this way. Would you be asking the question if they weren't? And oh by the way, if you look atr his entire body of work and know anything about Asian fighters, you would know that he has beaten many tough guys like Wethya Sakmuangklang, Seung-Kon Chae, Chatchai Sasakul, Chokchai Chockvivat, Reynante Jamili,Jorge Eliecer Julio, Fahsan 3K Battery, and Emmanuel Lucero. And this before his lates run of super wins against future Hall of Famers.

    This guy is an ATG!

    “If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton





  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Sanchez, Julio, Lucero, Barrera 2, Morales 2, Larios, Solis, Marquez, Hatton, DLH.......

    Pretty damn good resume....
    Those are the pros but the cons are

    Couldnt beat Sanchez

    Got knocked out by Torrencampo

    Got knocked out by Singursat

    Got beaten by a washed up Morales who was coming off a loss to Barrera

    In the Sanchez fight he was butted and cut not too mention it only went 6 rds, Torrencampo and Singusat were how early in his career?

    Thats like saying Bernard Hopkins is not that good BeCause he could not BeaT Clinton Mitchell

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Sanchez, Julio, Lucero, Barrera 2, Morales 2, Larios, Solis, Marquez, Hatton, DLH.......

    Pretty damn good resume....
    Those are the pros but the cons are

    Couldnt beat Sanchez

    Got knocked out by Torrencampo

    Got knocked out by Singursat

    Got beaten by a washed up Morales who was coming off a loss to Barrera

    In the Sanchez fight he was butted and cut not too mention it only went 6 rds, Torrencampo and Singusat were how early in his career?

    Thats like saying Bernard Hopkins is not that good BeCause he could not BeaT Clinton Mitchell
    Pac was actually winning against SAnchez when the fight was called off. Those who keep on bringing Sanchez should better watch again that fight. Pac was hitting SAnchez with power punches and it would just be a matter of few rounds that Sanchez would go down with the punishment he was getting from Pac. Sanchez was the dirtiest fighter I've seen.

    Anyway, no need to mention Sanchez unless you're VD's alt.

  7. #7
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    I always get a kick out of the fact that up until being destroyed by Manny Hatton "Was" eLITE....

    aFTER THE mANNY BEATDOW HE SUDDENLY BECOMES A CLUB FIGHTER IN PEOPLES EYES....

    Just like,,,,(pre handwrap issue).....Margarito was nothing more then a club fighter til he beat Cotto......

    Can't be both ways....

    Hatton was elite, he beat big names in the WW and JWW divisions, he was the man at 140 til he lost to Manny....Hatton was in no way a second rate fighter
    I think Ricky Hatton was a very good fighter, but i don't know about elite. Who are these big names he beat ? he only had 1 win at Welterweight a very controversial decision against Luis Collazo.

    He beat Kostya Tszyu which was a very good win, but he was for certain on the slide at that time IMO. He beat a very faded Jose Luis Castillo.

    And his other wins against Ray Olveria, Freddie Pendleton, Ben Tackie, who were shot fighters or just only decent to begin with like Ben Tackie.

    And fighters like Paul Malignaggi who is only known for taking a good beating, off Miguel Cotto had looked garbage in his previous fights before the Ricky Hatton one. And Juan Urango got a gift decision to earn his title.

    I give Manny Pacquiao alot of credit but i think calling Ricky Hatton elite, or saying he beat big names is a bit of stretch IMO.

    But i agree with what your saying Ricky Hatton certainly wasn't no, 2nd rate fighter or ETC. I just never thought Ricky Hatton was that great to be honest, but thats a debatable opinion.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Ricky Hatton was a good fighter, just not elite. I mean would anyone call Arturo Gatti an elite fighter or just good fighter?

    And I have to add that Manny Pacquiao is an 1 dimensional fighter/brawler. These guys gets exposed against elite slick boxers. Think Ali-Liston, Whittaker-Chavez, Leonard-Duran 2, Robinson-Lamotta, Mayweather-Gatti, etc.

    It's been proven in boxing history that the all time greatest boxers in this sport are slick boxers, 1 dimensional brawlers ends up getting embarrassed.
    Last edited by generalbulldog; 07-08-2009 at 01:28 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    I always get a kick out of the fact that up until being destroyed by Manny Hatton "Was" eLITE....

    aFTER THE mANNY BEATDOW HE SUDDENLY BECOMES A CLUB FIGHTER IN PEOPLES EYES....

    Just like,,,,(pre handwrap issue).....Margarito was nothing more then a club fighter til he beat Cotto......

    Can't be both ways....

    Hatton was elite, he beat big names in the WW and JWW divisions, he was the man at 140 til he lost to Manny....Hatton was in no way a second rate fighter
    I think Ricky Hatton was a very good fighter, but i don't know about elite. Who are these big names he beat ? he only had 1 win at Welterweight a very controversial decision against Luis Collazo.

    He beat Kostya Tszyu which was a very good win, but he was for certain on the slide at that time IMO. He beat a very faded Jose Luis Castillo.

    And his other wins against Ray Olveria, Freddie Pendleton, Ben Tackie, who were shot fighters or just only decent to begin with like Ben Tackie.

    And fighters like Paul Malignaggi who is only known for taking a good beating, off Miguel Cotto had looked garbage in his previous fights before the Ricky Hatton one. And Juan Urango got a gift decision to earn his title.

    I give Manny Pacquiao alot of credit but i think calling Ricky Hatton elite, or saying he beat big names is a bit of stretch IMO.

    But i agree with what your saying Ricky Hatton certainly wasn't no, 2nd rate fighter or ETC. I just never thought Ricky Hatton was that great to be honest, but thats a debatable opinion.

    But again until the Pacquiao loss who was staing different?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 05:08 AM
  2. Mayweather: Pacquiao's got nothing on me
    By pacman79 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2009, 07:17 PM
  3. What did you think of Pacquiao's performance.
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-09-2008, 06:38 AM
  4. Pacquiao's weight
    By donnydarkoIRL in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-13-2008, 06:26 PM
  5. PACQUIAO'S PRESSURES!!!
    By mizpah in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 07:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing