Freddie Roach is a CNUT

[Diane]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?