Freddie Roach is a CNUT

[C.J.Rock]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

[ElTerribleMorales]

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

dude you're beating a dead horse, Tony used plaster, it's not even suspicion anymore it's fact, how many times, no one knows but him and his trainer, get over it

[C.J.Rock]

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

dude you're beating a dead horse, Tony used plaster, it's not even suspicion anymore it's fact, how many times, no one knows but him and his trainer, get over it

If what you say could be proven Mararito would have been banned for life and rightly so. But they cannot find proof only that the pads he had were technically illegal which is why he isnt on a lifetime ban.
You guys are so quick to accuse Margarito of cheating but you ignore Moselys previous steroid abuse. Margaritos fans could easliy claim Mosely;s sudden dramatic improvement could be due to him using Hgh why is not detectable by the pee test given to fighters. But they are not haters like some of you are

[boozeboxer]

Pretty sure JT Rock and C.J. Rock are cousins.

[HattonTheHammer]

Pretty sure JT Rock and C.J. Rock are cousins.

"CRIPPLE FIGHT"

[C.J.Rock]

Pretty sure JT Rock and C.J. Rock are cousins.

He aint no kin of mine LOL I've had this name in various forums & chatrooms since 1992 so I guess you could say he liked my name & copied it LOL
I do promise to do my best to help him improve his boxing knowledge & teach him some manners to improve his on forum ettiquette though
I'm really just having a little fun here BUT knowing Tony Margarito as I do I refuse to accuse the guy of cheating when no one can prove any wrong doing other than a harmless though illegal pad in his wraps. If there are any bad guys here its the Ca commisioners look what a total screw up theyve made.

[HattonTheHammer]

Pretty sure JT Rock and C.J. Rock are cousins.

He aint no kin of mine LOL I've had this name in various forums & chatrooms since 1992 so I guess you could say he liked my name & copied it LOL
I do promise to do my best to help him improve his boxing knowledge & teach him some manners to improve his on forum ettiquette though
I'm really just having a little fun here BUT knowing Tony Margarito as I do I refuse to accuse the guy of cheating when no one can prove any wrong doing other than a harmless though illegal pad in his wraps. If there are any bad guys here its the Ca commisioners look what a total screw up theyve made.

dont worry about it, everyone argues with JT at one point or another.

he knows his boxing but needs to get rid of that chip he has on his shoulder and stop turning decent threads into slanging matches!

[C.J.Rock]

Pretty sure JT Rock and C.J. Rock are cousins.

He aint no kin of mine LOL I've had this name in various forums & chatrooms since 1992 so I guess you could say he liked my name & copied it LOL
I do promise to do my best to help him improve his boxing knowledge & teach him some manners to improve his on forum ettiquette though
I'm really just having a little fun here BUT knowing Tony Margarito as I do I refuse to accuse the guy of cheating when no one can prove any wrong doing other than a harmless though illegal pad in his wraps. If there are any bad guys here its the Ca commisioners look what a total screw up theyve made.

dont worry about it, everyone argues with JT at one point or another.

he knows his boxing but needs to get rid of that chip he has on his shoulder and stop turning decent threads into slanging matches!

Thanks Hatton Hey just think if everyone agreed on everything it wouldnt be much fun would it LOL

[LEGION]

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

dude you're beating a dead horse, Tony used plaster, it's not even suspicion anymore it's fact, how many times, no one knows but him and his trainer, get over it

Someone call PETA!!!!