Do we judge fighters too much by words ascribed to them rather than heard directly?

[Kev]

Not to worry ICB he'll start arguing with someone else soon enough, he's trying to wind you up, taking the contrary view for the sake of it.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUozZo8nOpYhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE'Natural 'Knowledge' and Natural 'Design'' by Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net

'Heat the Hornet' by Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense: Scientific American

ha see Missy I'm getting you thinking now eh, you're studying science!

The Why are there still chimpanzees link made me laugh, Richard Dawkins proudly showing us those empty spaces of nothing on his diagram, saying 'we share a common ancestor here' pointing to an empty space on his diagram where the ancestor we share is missing, then 'gorillas share a common ancestor here', pointing to another empty space, and finally 'urangutans share an ancestor here' and he points to yet another empty gap.

I don't even need to disprove this crappy theory Dawkins can do it for me, he pointed to three invisible gaps of nothing on his family tree and you think that is evidence

All he did was demonstrate what I've been saying all along, there are NO missing links, because they DON'T EXIST

[Kev]

His diatoms in the fossil record is NOT an example of macro evolution either. That's merely speciation something that creationists believe in as well.

Macro evolution would be that little diatom turning into something other than a diatom, not simply a different species of diatom.

You see there are two things going on here, speciation, which is the observable, provable, demonstrable adaptation of an organism to its enviroment, something which occurs all the time, and can demonstrated easily, like the diatom example Dawkins gave.

Then there is Macro evolution, which is the evolution of a completely new organism, for example, the diatom becoming something else which isn't a diatom, or a dog evolving into something else which isn't a dog.

This CANNOT happen, there is no known biological mechanism for this to happen and such tranistional fossils do not exist in the fossil record which is why Dawkins when proudly showing off his chimpanzee/human family tree was pointing to EMPTY GAPS when he was showing us our ancestors. They can't find the ancestors because macro evolution DOES NOT HAPPEN