Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 195

Thread: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post

    You guys bitching and moaning about the weight and split can save it. No one forced Cotto to take the fight. He has a team of negotiators who settled on those terms with the Paquiao camp. If Cotto and his team are satisfied with the terms, then there's no reason anyone else should care. 145 is a welterweight fight by definition, period. It's perfectly legitimate for the belt to be at stake and Cotto doesn't have a problem with it.
    Hey Cotto and PAC can negotiate and fight at whatever weight they agree to that's fine, that's not the problem I have with this. MY problem is that this is for a title. It is not up to PAC and Cotto to determine what the welterweight limit is. If it's going to be for a welterweight title Cotto should be able to come in at the WW limit. Everything else the purse split, and all other negotiations, I could care less about. It should be a great fight and entertaining, but it shouldn't be a title fight. If PAC wins it's not like he's going to defend the title anyway.
    The weight limit is NOT what makes this a welterweight fight. It is a welterweight fight because it is a fight over 140 and below 147. That is the definition of a welterweight fight. Period. That means the belt being at stake is perfectly legit. And, yeah, Pac may not defend it but it is a big deal because if he wins he's the first 7 division champion.
    Right but in this case because contracts are signed the Welterweight limit is between 140 and 145 is that correct? BY DEFINITION because they are not adhering to the welterweight limits it is a CATCHWEIGHT fight.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    948
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Hey Cotto and PAC can negotiate and fight at whatever weight they agree to that's fine, that's not the problem I have with this. MY problem is that this is for a title. It is not up to PAC and Cotto to determine what the welterweight limit is. If it's going to be for a welterweight title Cotto should be able to come in at the WW limit. Everything else the purse split, and all other negotiations, I could care less about. It should be a great fight and entertaining, but it shouldn't be a title fight. If PAC wins it's not like he's going to defend the title anyway.
    The weight limit is NOT what makes this a welterweight fight. It is a welterweight fight because it is a fight over 140 and below 147. That is the definition of a welterweight fight. Period. That means the belt being at stake is perfectly legit. And, yeah, Pac may not defend it but it is a big deal because if he wins he's the first 7 division champion.
    Right but in this case because contracts are signed the Welterweight limit is between 140 and 145 is that correct? BY DEFINITION because they are not adhering to the welterweight limits it is a CATCHWEIGHT fight.
    It's both a catchweight fight AND a welterweight fight. It falls within the welterweight limit with the maximum weight allowed moved down two pounds. But it still qualifies as a welterweight fight because it's below 147 and above 140. And remember, Cotto weighed 146 against Clottey so I really don't see one more pound as a big deal. Cotto agreed to it and has made clear he doesn't see it as an issue, so I don't know why anyone else should.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post

    The weight limit is NOT what makes this a welterweight fight. It is a welterweight fight because it is a fight over 140 and below 147. That is the definition of a welterweight fight. Period. That means the belt being at stake is perfectly legit. And, yeah, Pac may not defend it but it is a big deal because if he wins he's the first 7 division champion.
    Right but in this case because contracts are signed the Welterweight limit is between 140 and 145 is that correct? BY DEFINITION because they are not adhering to the welterweight limits it is a CATCHWEIGHT fight.
    It's both a catchweight fight AND a welterweight fight. It falls within the welterweight limit with the maximum weight allowed moved down two pounds. But it still qualifies as a welterweight fight because it's below 147 and above 140. And remember, Cotto weighed 146 against Clottey so I really don't see one more pound as a big deal. Cotto agreed to it and has made clear he doesn't see it as an issue, so I don't know why anyone else should.
    Sorry man that statement doesn't make sense.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1336
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Right but in this case because contracts are signed the Welterweight limit is between 140 and 145 is that correct? BY DEFINITION because they are not adhering to the welterweight limits it is a CATCHWEIGHT fight.
    It's both a catchweight fight AND a welterweight fight. It falls within the welterweight limit with the maximum weight allowed moved down two pounds. But it still qualifies as a welterweight fight because it's below 147 and above 140. And remember, Cotto weighed 146 against Clottey so I really don't see one more pound as a big deal. Cotto agreed to it and has made clear he doesn't see it as an issue, so I don't know why anyone else should.
    Sorry man that statement doesn't make sense.
    it does when you smoke crack and have a man crush on Pacquiao, backing up the contract crap so much, don't get why Haye and his fans bitched so much about Klitschko's demands, nobody put a gun to Hayes head either
    just cause it's in the contract doesn't make it right

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    948
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post

    It's both a catchweight fight AND a welterweight fight. It falls within the welterweight limit with the maximum weight allowed moved down two pounds. But it still qualifies as a welterweight fight because it's below 147 and above 140. And remember, Cotto weighed 146 against Clottey so I really don't see one more pound as a big deal. Cotto agreed to it and has made clear he doesn't see it as an issue, so I don't know why anyone else should.
    Sorry man that statement doesn't make sense.
    it does when you smoke crack and have a man crush on Pacquiao, backing up the contract crap so much, don't get why Haye and his fans bitched so much about Klitschko's demands, nobody put a gun to Hayes head either
    just cause it's in the contract doesn't make it right
    You're acting like Manny is a king on the throne forcing the peasant Cotto to do his bidding. Cotto could have told Manny to stuff it, but he doesn't care about the weight. So, yes, it IS right.

    And as far as my statement about it being a catchweight and a welterweight fight, it DOES make perfect since if you have the ability to think. Between 140 and 147 is welterweight. 145 falls in that area, therefore it's a welterweight fight. But the limit was moved down two pounds, so it's also a catchweight. It ain't rocket science, some of you will just complain about anything.

    Oh, and I wouldn't even say I am a huge Manny fan. Paul Williams is my favorite active fighter and Manny is well down the list, though I do like him. I also like Cotto. I am pulling for Manny just because I would like to see history made, but I will be happy for Cotto if he wins.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    948
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Right but in this case because contracts are signed the Welterweight limit is between 140 and 145 is that correct? BY DEFINITION because they are not adhering to the welterweight limits it is a CATCHWEIGHT fight.
    It's both a catchweight fight AND a welterweight fight. It falls within the welterweight limit with the maximum weight allowed moved down two pounds. But it still qualifies as a welterweight fight because it's below 147 and above 140. And remember, Cotto weighed 146 against Clottey so I really don't see one more pound as a big deal. Cotto agreed to it and has made clear he doesn't see it as an issue, so I don't know why anyone else should.
    Sorry man that statement doesn't make sense.
    It makes perfect sense. The 147 limit is NOT the only thing that makes it a welterweight fight. If it is below 147 and above 140, then it is a welterweight bout by definition. But it is also a catchweight fight because the two sides agreed to move the limit down to 145. But 145 falls between 147 and 140, so it is still a welterweight fight also. Makes perfect sense.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post

    It's both a catchweight fight AND a welterweight fight. It falls within the welterweight limit with the maximum weight allowed moved down two pounds. But it still qualifies as a welterweight fight because it's below 147 and above 140. And remember, Cotto weighed 146 against Clottey so I really don't see one more pound as a big deal. Cotto agreed to it and has made clear he doesn't see it as an issue, so I don't know why anyone else should.
    Sorry man that statement doesn't make sense.
    It makes perfect sense. The 147 limit is NOT the only thing that makes it a welterweight fight. If it is below 147 and above 140, then it is a welterweight bout by definition. But it is also a catchweight fight because the two sides agreed to move the limit down to 145. But 145 falls between 147 and 140, so it is still a welterweight fight also. Makes perfect sense.
    No it doesn't, it is a Catchweight fight, it is not a Welterweight Catchweight fight. A catchweight fight is a negotiated weight limit BETWEEN two weight classes. Otherwise there would be no reason to mention the catchweight at all, they always fall within a weight class.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    948
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    Sorry man that statement doesn't make sense.
    It makes perfect sense. The 147 limit is NOT the only thing that makes it a welterweight fight. If it is below 147 and above 140, then it is a welterweight bout by definition. But it is also a catchweight fight because the two sides agreed to move the limit down to 145. But 145 falls between 147 and 140, so it is still a welterweight fight also. Makes perfect sense.
    No it doesn't, it is a Catchweight fight, it is not a Welterweight Catchweight fight. A catchweight fight is a negotiated weight limit BETWEEN two weight classes. Otherwise there would be no reason to mention the catchweight at all, they always fall within a weight class.
    If it's between 140 and 147, then it's a welterweight fight. That's what a welterweight fight is. 145 is between those weights, so it's a welterweight fight. It's not "BETWEEN" two weight classes, it falls directly within the welterweight area.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubberLang View Post

    It makes perfect sense. The 147 limit is NOT the only thing that makes it a welterweight fight. If it is below 147 and above 140, then it is a welterweight bout by definition. But it is also a catchweight fight because the two sides agreed to move the limit down to 145. But 145 falls between 147 and 140, so it is still a welterweight fight also. Makes perfect sense.
    No it doesn't, it is a Catchweight fight, it is not a Welterweight Catchweight fight. A catchweight fight is a negotiated weight limit BETWEEN two weight classes. Otherwise there would be no reason to mention the catchweight at all, they always fall within a weight class.
    If it's between 140 and 147, then it's a welterweight fight. That's what a welterweight fight is. 145 is between those weights, so it's a welterweight fight.
    So in your opinion there are no catchweights?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1383
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    although i heard of late that it's not going to be for any title, whether true or not i say screw the belt,let's just have a good fight.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by KKisser View Post
    although i heard of late that it's not going to be for any title, whether true or not i say screw the belt,let's just have a good fight.
    That would be my ideal scenario. Regardless of how I feel about the title this should be a good fight and I look forward to it.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1389
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Cotto's welterweight belt is on the line!!!

    Who gives a fuck. They are fighting eachother. Cotto coming in at 145 will make almost zero difference. It makes roughly the same difference as Pac fighting somebody naturally so much bigger does.

    All those calling Pac a pussy etc need to give their heads a wobble.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:55 PM
  2. Cotto's back !
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-07-2008, 12:58 AM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 08:12 PM
  4. Taylor vs Wright : Only WBC Belt on the line
    By Pantera in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 01:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing