Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Bradley VS Campbell

Voters
30. This poll is closed
  • Nate Campbell by Decision

    8 26.67%
  • Nate Campbell by TKO

    5 16.67%
  • Timothy Bradley by Decision

    13 43.33%
  • Timothy Bradley by TKO

    4 13.33%
  • Draw: ie... you are too scared to make your mind up!!!

    0 0%
Page 22 of 24 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 348

Thread: Bradley vs Campbell

Share/Bookmark
  1. #316
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1385
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    I think Campbell tried being clever, as he new the cut would only get worst and after 4 rounds more chance of it going to Bradley if it was stopped.

    Bit of a shame really but props to Bradley starting to get on a bit of a roll and I think he deserves a big fight now. Where do you see him going? There isnt much happening at 140 in terms of huge money fights other than Hatton v Bradley and I cant see Hatton fighting a dangerous fighter like Bradley. I like Bradelys attitude maybe he will have to go 147 if he wants the big pay days.

  2. #317
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    I think Campbell tried being clever, as he new the cut would only get worst and after 4 rounds more chance of it going to Bradley if it was stopped.

    Bit of a shame really but props to Bradley starting to get on a bit of a roll and I think he deserves a big fight now. Where do you see him going? There isnt much happening at 140 in terms of huge money fights other than Hatton v Bradley and I cant see Hatton fighting a dangerous fighter like Bradley. I like Bradelys attitude maybe he will have to go 147 if he wants the big pay days.
    I like Bradley, he tries hard. He is nothing special in any particular area but has fairly quick hands and works and works. You sense that he is getting better fight by fight too. I think he should stick around at 140 for a few more fights as he is young and makes the weight easily. But you are right in that 140 looks a bit dry at the moment.

  3. #318
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    The hate Nate Campbell is getting for stopping with the cut is funny to me. Where were these people when Barerra was fighting Khan? That were saying that Barerra should have backed out of the fight and that the cut was terrible and how Khan should get no credit whatsoever.

    Now Bradley gets no criticism whatsoever in fact now Campbell is getting a lot of flack for pulling out.

    This double standard in boxing annoys me. On one hand you have a fighter not do it and you bash him and his opponent for it, and on this hand you have a fighter that does it and you say he isn't a warrior and you've lost respect?

    Which one is it gonna be?
    I agree it should have been a NC. The only difference is that there were two clean rounds prior and I didn't see Campbell in the fight at all. He got the butt and wanted out immediately. In that sense I see it more like Toney:Rahman 2 than Barrera:Khan.

    Isn't it there's a head clash prior in round 2 tho no cut suffered yet?

  4. #319
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    It was a crappy ending to what was supposed to be a great fight.

    The referee was worthless, and the cut was caused by an accidental butt and thus the result should have been a NC and not a TKO win for Bradley.

    BUT Campbell asked for the fight to be stop and quit. And anytime you quit in the other guys hometown, knowing that the referee never confirmed that the cut was from an accidental clash of heads, well you are risking getting screwed.

    There is still a chance the commission could over turn this like they did with the Rahman vs. Toney fight.
    Thats what surprised me. Nate is always complaining about the politics of boxing, yet as a seasoned pro he banks on the Calafornia officials to be "fair." He is now 0-3 in California. I think that he does have issues fighting away from his hometown of Florida, which he seldom does.
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

  5. #320
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    IMO Nate wanted out of that fight. I think he knew he was outgunned and as soon as the cut happened he tryed to get out of the fight. Like others have said Nate should have at least found out what the ruling was on the cut (punch or HB). Instead he basically told his corner he quit. Once he found out the ref ruled it a punch he should have at least tryed to continue for a half round or so. See what happens.......

  6. #321
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    It was a crappy ending to what was supposed to be a great fight.

    The referee was worthless, and the cut was caused by an accidental butt and thus the result should have been a NC and not a TKO win for Bradley.

    BUT Campbell asked for the fight to be stop and quit. And anytime you quit in the other guys hometown, knowing that the referee never confirmed that the cut was from an accidental clash of heads, well you are risking getting screwed.

    There is still a chance the commission could over turn this like they did with the Rahman vs. Toney fight.
    Thats what surprised me. Nate is always complaining about the politics of boxing, yet as a seasoned pro he banks on the Calafornia officials to be "fair." He is now 0-3 in California. I think that he does have issues fighting away from his hometown of Florida, which he seldom does.
    I think Nate knew he was behind on the cards, and felt the cut was bad and the fight would be stopped in the next couple rounds so rather than go to the cards and lose a decision he tried to get a no contest.

    It backfired though cus of the ref being a dodgy lil bitch.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  7. #322
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. His suppose to be a matured pro now but relied on officials to call the fight fair? He was getting beat up and knock back to the ropes.

    I think Bradley deserves credit he pounded Nate anywhere he can hit him. Nate imo knew he wasn't going to last so he went for a nc decision.

  8. #323
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. His suppose to be a matured pro now but relied on officials to call the fight fair? He was getting beat up and knock back to the ropes.

    I think Bradley deserves credit he pounded Nate anywhere he can hit him. Nate imo knew he wasn't going to last so he went for a nc decision.

    i agree with everything above

  9. #324
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3148
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call

  10. #325
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2096
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    I'm late with my imput on last night's showdown because someone in this house can't stop playing around on Farmville.

    Campbell should have gotten his NC but it did seem like he was on his way to some sort of defeat.

    I hope I was able to explain the situation to you dum-dum pops.

    Seriously, what is there left to say after that? In fact the only reason I posted a comment is so you guys know I'm alive.

  11. #326
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rocky55 View Post

    the cut is not long but it's reported as deep gash. i found one pic posted below.

    That cut would bleed into his eye.
    I know, I already said that, but others have gone on with cuts like that, is all I'm saying.

    Let me ask this, Campbell was dedicating this fight in part to Gatti, do you think Gatti would have quit with a cut like that? I think not.
    No he would not. Your 100% right

  12. #327
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1074
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Campbell was beat to the punch from beginning to end but rules are rules. If the referee was alert it would be a no contest but either way, that fight belonged to Bradley.

  13. #328
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call
    Nobody on this board disagrees that it was a bad call. Maybe you think Bradley was butting intentional. I don't see it that way. I think the butt was unintentional. Yes, it should have been an NC. This is not the first or last time ref got it wrong, but Nate was clearly looking to have the fight stopped. If Nate had felt that he was going to win the fight, he would have soldiered on I promise you- like Cotto and many others have done.

    I feel for Nate getting a bad call. The same thing happened to Ward against Phillips and it sucked when that happened, and it sucked again for Ward in the Leija fight when a cut caused by a punch got called a butt and Leija got the win from hometown judges. Nobody like to see the wrong call, but you are acting like Tim Bradley and the ref rain a train on your mom or your sister. I would have loved to see Nate pull it off last night, but it wasn't his night. I know, he knew it, most people watching knew it, and if you get over yourself and rewatch the fight objectively, you will know it, too.

    If Nate wasn't fighting a dirty fight himself, perhaps people would have more simpathy for him. But Nate was butting, holding, hitting low, and generally trying to play head games with Bradley. That was pretty obvious.

    You make a bad analogy to the JMM/Diaz fight. Don't even try to make like Nate would have been able to pull a JMM against Bradley. Even old, Marquez was clearly faster than Diaz (never known for his handspeed anyway). It looked like Diaz might be able to dictate the fight based on strenght and aggression, but he wasn't making Marquez look old. He was making him look small.

  14. #329
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1339
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by RozzySean View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call
    Nobody on this board disagrees that it was a bad call. Maybe you think Bradley was butting intentional. I don't see it that way. I think the butt was unintentional. Yes, it should have been an NC. This is not the first or last time ref got it wrong, but Nate was clearly looking to have the fight stopped. If Nate had felt that he was going to win the fight, he would have soldiered on I promise you- like Cotto and many others have done.

    I feel for Nate getting a bad call. The same thing happened to Ward against Phillips and it sucked when that happened, and it sucked again for Ward in the Leija fight when a cut caused by a punch got called a butt and Leija got the win from hometown judges. Nobody like to see the wrong call, but you are acting like Tim Bradley and the ref rain a train on your mom or your sister. I would have loved to see Nate pull it off last night, but it wasn't his night. I know, he knew it, most people watching knew it, and if you get over yourself and rewatch the fight objectively, you will know it, too.

    If Nate wasn't fighting a dirty fight himself, perhaps people would have more simpathy for him. But Nate was butting, holding, hitting low, and generally trying to play head games with Bradley. That was pretty obvious.

    You make a bad analogy to the JMM/Diaz fight. Don't even try to make like Nate would have been able to pull a JMM against Bradley. Even old, Marquez was clearly faster than Diaz (never known for his handspeed anyway). It looked like Diaz might be able to dictate the fight based on strenght and aggression, but he wasn't making Marquez look old. He was making him look small.
    yea i agree, even though i kinda felt that the comments from Bradley were a bit out of place (the whole, "i was gonna win anyway, he was getting older"), i very much doubt that the headbutt was intentional, he seems to be a complete class act and willing to take on anyone, and that's only something you can admire, i hope the decision is overruled, cause if there's ever one that should be it's this one, but i doubt it will

  15. #330
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2096
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Bradley is a very good fighter, but I think Campbell breaks him down.

    Campbell by decision, maybe even a late stoppage!!!
    There you go Fenster. You were just a few weeks away from victory.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. campbell v bradley who you got
    By paddy448 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 08:37 PM
  2. Timothy Bradley vs Nate Campbell
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-18-2009, 01:22 PM
  3. Bradley to face Campbell!
    By TigerFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 05:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing