Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
That's not right.. The Ring went out of buisness for a short time in 1989, when they restarted they stopped recognising lineal champs. That's why the lineage is lost in 1989. They then ignored their own history when they restarted the ratings years later.
You can trace Pac from Yong-Kang Kim.
Yong Kang Kim-Sot Chitalada-Maungchai Kittikasem-Yuri Arbachakov-Chatchai Sasakul-Manny Pacquiao.
The man who beat the man![]()
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
Array
funny thing is that pretty much every OTHER division after 89 has a lineal champion put most as early as the early 90's
Array
yea he sure isthis is coming from the same guy who had Witter as one of the top guys at 140
Array
In 2005 Witter was rated no.5 best lightwelter on the planet by The Ring. Over the next couple of years, after winning the WBC title, he rose to no.1 best lightwelter on the planet according to The Ring.
If you are rated no.1 by The Ring it pretty much makes you a top fighter, right?
Now don't get upset ElTerribleMorales, my intention was not to "own" you, about Pac at flyweight, just to merely inform.![]()
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
somtimes, people do things they did not intend to do.
People intend to not acknowledge people for their wins but when they lose use it as proof that they would lose to their favorite fighter. Never say a word when Witter was beating Corley and sparked out Vivian Harris, but now will scream to high heavens years later that he'd never beat Hatton because of how he looked against Bradley. Well given how Hatton looked against Mayweather and Pacquiao it could easily be said its just as plausible that Witter would have KO'd him. But those days are long gone but at one point Witter was one of the top light welters in the world and his recent losses won't change he was in that position once in his career regardless.
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks