Minto vs Holmes...anyone see this fight?

[Spicoli]

don't see how the hell it'd be the correct call, it'd only be a No Contest if the cut had come by a headbutt before the 4th and it ended before the 4th, if the cut was caused by a punch, doesn't matter what round, it's a TKO, look at the bullshit they tried to push in the Campbell/Bradley fight before it was overruled

Thats where I'm at on it.Very similiar situations and surely Campbell/Bradley aftermath comes into play as far as the review but no where near the publicity.

I have little interest in watching two lower level spongy heavys having a go but would love to see this one,how it was unfolding and the cut itself.But seems twisted.....Holmes recieved satisfaction in taking the "L" off his record but almost a slap in that they found it to be a punch that caused the cut,Minto cannot see and told Doctor,fight stopped,no matter if it happened that night or days later.....thats a tech knockout,game over.The inside of 4 rounds becomes mute.Half hearted effort in 'getting it right'?Who reviews the reviewers lol.

Maybe the argument is that Minto would have continued on had he known it was a cut. Which of course just makes it his own fault.

Oh man it gets better.Just read that the NC ruling as a result of the review was only a "recommendation" and the Tech win stands .....at least for 2 weeks.Smells like a little CYA if you ask me.Has to be record time there when it comes to reviewing the reviews of an initial ruling.My head hurts now