Kirkland news, kind of.

[global]

And any of that has to do with gun laws how? Previously convicted drug dealers I believe shouldn't face any worse punishment than a normal person if they were to be found in possession of an amount appropriate to personal use. Sexual predators of almost all types need to have harsher sentences for sure. Pedophiles shouldn't be allowed near children ever, there is quite a bit of evidence suggesting most will never stop having fantasies and urges. Again I don't know how any of that has to do with gun laws regarding felons though.

umm yea i'm seriously not gonna bother talkin to this brick wall, mark this one's all yours

haha, nah man, I didn't even want to respond in the first place. You can't beat common sense into some people.

Mark, it is much easier to just say "yeah he has no common sense" than it is to actually show any kind of evidence of such. So what about my posts isn't common sense? We can agree that people with violent convictions in the past should in most cases not get their gun rights back and we can agree that Kirkland should be punished for this. So the difference is that I believe we shouldn't have a blanket law disallowing felons from owning guns? Fine you can believe they shouldn't but isn't it common sense that someone who stole over $1000, cheated on taxes, or committed some other non violent offense deemed a felony shouldn't be excluded from owning a gun? Or is the problem that I said I could understand why Kirkland might want to own a gun after being robbed at gunpoint earlier this year?

And Morales, you couldn't explain what pedophiles and drug dealing has to do with any of the previous statements, instead you chose to just say I'm not listening. I'm listening I just want to hear something back related to what I was saying