does the winner of the SMW super six have a better resume than Calzaghe??

[Nameless]

Nope Joe Calzaghe Is A Class On His Own And He Well And Truly Defeated Kessler In A Beautiul Fight....which He Won Easily... Joes Undeafted Status Will Go Down In History And That Is Wat Makes Him Greater Then Any Of These Wannabe Greats.....joe Was A Absolutely Brilliant Fighter And His Resume Will Remain Unmatched 50 Years From Now

Well, Marciano already has a better resume than Joe... so you should say that Marciano will remain with an unmatched resume for 50 years Also, if we talk in matter of quality of opponent, Jermaine has the edge over Joe big time. Not saying he's better, but just like the violent one stated, quality of opponent for quality of opponent, Jermaine has a better one to this day and it is quite likely to think that he'll continue to face dangerous guys, no matter win or lose.

No he doesn't. If it's just about names faced then Calzaghe faced Roy Jones. Roy pisses over every name on Taylors record barring Hopkins. Calzaghe faced Hopkins too.

So Calzaghe wins this easy.

I would agree with you if he would have beaten a.. let's say, 33-34-35 years old Roy Jones and not a way pass its prime and fading 40 years old Jones.

[Fenster]

Well, Marciano already has a better resume than Joe... so you should say that Marciano will remain with an unmatched resume for 50 years Also, if we talk in matter of quality of opponent, Jermaine has the edge over Joe big time. Not saying he's better, but just like the violent one stated, quality of opponent for quality of opponent, Jermaine has a better one to this day and it is quite likely to think that he'll continue to face dangerous guys, no matter win or lose.

No he doesn't. If it's just about names faced then Calzaghe faced Roy Jones. Roy pisses over every name on Taylors record barring Hopkins. Calzaghe faced Hopkins too.

So Calzaghe wins this easy.

I would agree with you if he would have beaten a.. let's say, 33-34-35 years old Roy Jones and not a way pass its prime and fading 40 years old Jones.

So you think it's better to lose than to win?

Taylor getting knocked out by Carl Froch is better for his resume than Calzaghe beating Roy Jones?

Fucks sake

[Rantcatrat]

Well, Marciano already has a better resume than Joe... so you should say that Marciano will remain with an unmatched resume for 50 years Also, if we talk in matter of quality of opponent, Jermaine has the edge over Joe big time. Not saying he's better, but just like the violent one stated, quality of opponent for quality of opponent, Jermaine has a better one to this day and it is quite likely to think that he'll continue to face dangerous guys, no matter win or lose.

No he doesn't. If it's just about names faced then Calzaghe faced Roy Jones. Roy pisses over every name on Taylors record barring Hopkins. Calzaghe faced Hopkins too.

So Calzaghe wins this easy.

I would agree with you if he would have beaten a.. let's say, 33-34-35 years old Roy Jones and not a way pass its prime and fading 40 years old Jones.

Right, but Calzaghe was 37 at the time of the fight. It goes both ways.

[sumkalambay]

lmao at woodhall schooling froch.

the funniest shit i've ever heard.

[gudnite vienna]

RJJ has actually looked prity good lately.. and yeh JC was no spring chicken when he fought B-Hop and RJJ