Where we disagree is that I don't regard a developing child as a bunch of cells.
It's not about giving a bunch of cells more rights but rather protecting the rights of the unborn. Once the featus is developing its a human being right now imo and so abortion is morally wrong.
However I don't blame the woman as much as I blame society as a whole.
And I do appreciate what you say about women being the ones who actually deal with the process of pregnancy etc whereas men don't have any real responsibility at all.
It's a tough issue but the rights of the unborn need to be protected. The argument that they are just a bunch of cells only holds any force for the first few weeks at the very most.
That's the real issue to all of this though IMO... when do you decide that life is life.
I couldn't answer that question myself tbh... and with the world having so many different beliefs/theories/research etc I can't see people ever agreeing.... not when I'm alive anyway![]()
That was my point Adam, it really depends on your worldview and your beliefs about where we come from.
If you believe we are created by God then life is sacred and abortion is self evidently wrong, if you believe we evolved then there is no such thing as right or wrong, but only societal norms, and hence abortion is fine,
The two camps will never agree.
@Missy, I don't see how giving a featus human rights elavates it above the woman, it places their rights on a par with them.
A woman couldn't decide to kill any other human because they didn't want them in their live so why should be able to choose to kill of their own child?
Granted other people arn't living and growing inside a women's womb, but they still need protection. The women does have free choice, she has the choice NOT to get pregnant if she doesn't want a child.
They arn't virgin births that are happening here, these women are getting pregnant because of their own actions, and part of life is that we have to accept the consequences of our actions.
But I do understand this is an extremely complicated issue and neither solution is ideal.
I am not against abortion in a legal sense, but I believe that education and support should be geared towards encouraging women, firstsly not to get pregnant if they don't want a child, and secondly that giving birth is given precendence and encouraged at all costs.
But it's an issue that will never really get solved as ultimately it depends on human nature changing, and that won't ever happen.
Does this mean because I don' believe in god I can do as I please?
Because by saying she can't abort means the foetus's welfare overrides that of the mother. You are taking away her right to abort and replacing it with a foetus's right to life.The two camps will never agree.
@Missy, I don't see how giving a featus human rights elavates it above the woman, it places their rights on a par with them.
Because its not a living breathing thing. There are more premature babies surviving than before but only with massive medical intervention even then it is likley to have health problems because it wasn't fully developed before birth.A woman couldn't decide to kill any other human because they didn't want them in their live so why should be able to choose to kill of their own child?
The only 100% effective method is to not have sex.Granted other people arn't living and growing inside a women's womb, but they still need protection. The women does have free choice, she has the choice NOT to get pregnant if she doesn't want a child.
If they're getting pregnant on their own you better start praying.They arn't virgin births that are happening here, these women are getting pregnant because of their own actions, and part of life is that we have to accept the consequences of our actions.
Good to see you'd force women to have kids they don't want, let's fill up our world with more unwanted. Great.
Education needs to be for both men and women.I am not against abortion in a legal sense, but I believe that education and support should be geared towards encouraging women, firstsly not to get pregnant if they don't want a child, and secondly that giving birth is given precendence and encouraged at all costs.
I think you want to return to the 1950's and 60's where women were shunned for being bad girls.
Men need to learn to keep it in their pants or at least ensure that a condom is used.
Guess who else do? ESPECIALLY considering as they're the ones who will have their body's go through a strenuous nine months (yes, I'm sure I can't even begin to imagine!!
That still doesn't stop there being a legion of slags out there who are more than happy to have unprotected sex with a complete stranger.
Both sexes are more than capable of being sluts.
Equally responsible, it takes two to do the dirty tango.![]()
Totally agree.
If women don't want the hassle of destroying a child, then perhaps they should think twice about inserting the penis.
Or else ensure that the male is wearing one of those rubber things.
Either way, it isn't all that difficult to go through life without impregnating people. I have been married for 4 years, I have never once impregnated my wife, and I won't until I am ready to provide for my family.
The world would be better off with more people like me. My family in the UK are having children like rabbits. I don't relate to that kind of shit.
Mate I'm 22 and it's ridiculous how many of my mates/people I know are having kids... I can only think of one who was in a serious relationship with the woman and even that was unplanned.
I've been with my girl for almost 2 years now and with everybody getting pregnant left right and centre it's made me extra cautious. Never once had a scare and needed a test... it's easy.
Without going into too much detail (I'll probably get ripped for this), even when she's been using birth control, I've never... *ahem* finished bare back.
The lad I mentioned before... his lass was on it, it didn't work.
Women are far to eager to blame men for everything, even when an equal amount of the responsibility lies with them. Yeah there are loads of arseholes running around with their cocks out... these woman are more than happy to open their legs for them though aren't they?
I would hope no feminists would be stupid enough to say "using protection is the man's responsibility" because they're the same people who would rip a bloke's bollo"cks off for saying "Protection?! that's the woman's responsibility.
It's everyone's...![]()
I think everybody should be responsible for themselves. If you want a sexual relationship but don't want kids, then you need to be responsible for yourself.
It's kind of like not putting locks on you front door because it's other people responsibility to be honest and law abiding, yes it is indeed their responsibility, but if you decide to not bother with locks because of this, well good luck....
It's great to see guys who are responsible. Many women think it's enough to be on the pill, frankly, it isn't, never mind pregnancy and all the other STI's going round. Both parties should insist on a condom but that's a bit like saying don't get drunk and don't have sex when you're drunk.
Missy, how about we just close our legs every so often and then you wouldn't have to keep having these abortions.....![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks