Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Some old musings on ring generalship

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,556
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1840
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some old musings on ring generalship

    This is perhaps more apparent in a fencing match, since the fencers may only move forward and backward. The 'fencing measure' is a central consideration for a fencer. It is the distance which a fencer keeps in relationship to his opponent, and is such that he cannot be reached unless his opponent lunges.

    Now imagine that you're in your boxing gear while standing on a fencing line. Your opponent stands at a 'fencing measure' in front of you. How would hit them?
    If you hear a voice within you saying that I am not a painter, then by all means paint and that voice will be silenced.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4191
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Some old musings on ring generalship

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Nagel View Post
    This is perhaps more apparent in a fencing match, since the fencers may only move forward and backward. The 'fencing measure' is a central consideration for a fencer. It is the distance which a fencer keeps in relationship to his opponent, and is such that he cannot be reached unless his opponent lunges.

    Now imagine that you're in your boxing gear while standing on a fencing line. Your opponent stands at a 'fencing measure' in front of you. How would hit them?
    With a paling, a nail gun or my level?

    fencing right, Oh God I have to fork out for mine soon,180 feet of it is falling down; big $$.



    I would interrupt their initial movement and strike on their reaction.Thats dealing in the initial contact stage of weapon to weapon or arm to arm not weapon to head stage that comes on the reaction to the reaction.
    Actually Id stick my sword in their knee cap on the first lower, then go high on that reaction, but hey thats me
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How do you define Ring Generalship?
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 05:30 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-08-2008, 12:13 PM
  3. Hatton/Malignaggi musings
    By Greig in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-24-2008, 02:44 PM
  4. Pac-Oscar... What worrys me - Just some Musings.
    By AdamGB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-21-2008, 12:15 AM
  5. Define Ring Generalship?!
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-12-2007, 04:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing