None of those have any effect on how you score a fight. Dirrell threw far more & did a lot less running than Haye. Froch didn't close the gap any better, but he did land more shots on thin air & to the back of Dirrell's head in a clinch if we're now scoring fights on what they almost did.
Oh & Sauerland do now have options on David Haye's next fights. I wouldn't be surprised if King does as well, he seemed happy enough at the end for Haye to get the decision in what appeared a close fight.
Yes whats he deal with that Jaz?? We have Hayemaker,Goldenboy,Sauerland and Don King all taking some of the pie.
Im certain I heard Haye say prior to the fight that he took this fight rather than Vitali because there was no options just one fight. Do you think Sauerland has just got some rites on Haye when it comes to the German TV?? You seem to no more mate but I cant see Goldenboy agreeing to them having some of his rites.
I did not see the fight. Still, I have a feeling I would think Valuev won. I'm one of the few who think he beat Chagaev, so if the fight Saturday went anything like that then...
Despite that, I do think valuev is a hindrance to the sport and not beating him is meaningless.
It's like a wheelchair-bound man trying to arm tackle Barry Sanders. It's not going to happen.
i goto aggree with the original poster........hayes been saying for over a year how the klit brothers are borring and that the division needs him he's goner set it alight hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nikolai Valuev did not land more punches, he was missing most of his punches and the only punch he was really throwing was the jab. David Haye wasn't no windmill himself, but he did what he had to do.
And he landed the more eye catching punches, aswell as more punches overall. And as you just said even if you thought Nikolai Valuev won, you can't really argue with the decision, considering the gifts Nikolai Valuev has got.
I thought the number one aim of boxing was to 'hit and not be hit'. Seems to me Haye's mantra that night was 'not be hit' without caring too much about the 'hit' part of it.
I've never seen so much praise heaped on a fighter that refused (for 95% of the fight) to engage..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks