both were terrific technicians and i admire both of them. canizales in particular had a beautiful style.
that said, i think canizales was the better fighter. a bit more versatile in technical skills and more athletic.
both were terrific technicians and i admire both of them. canizales in particular had a beautiful style.
that said, i think canizales was the better fighter. a bit more versatile in technical skills and more athletic.
Good post im a big fan of Ricardo Lopez, but Orlando Canizales was just as skillful as Ricardo Lopez if not more skillful. He could punch in angles so well, i love the way he'd step to the side to find openings. And his footwork was top notch aswell.
I don't think theres much difference in there opposition, except that Ricardo Lopez did manage to win a world title by moving up, where as Orlando Canizales didn't. Although he did come so close against Wilfredo Vasquez.
When amat sees this he'll think you're talking to yourself.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
By the way im liking that Harold Shand picture![]()
I remember back in the day when poor old Billy Hardy was robbed against Canizales.
Shows how good Naz was. Fact.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
ricardo lopez was great while orlando canizales was just a notch below. but both made many successful title defenses. finito had a total of 22 while canizales had 16 which in any era is very impressive. both were great, great technicians but i have to say i think lopez was just a little better.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks