If pac beats pbf is there nothing more to prove for him?

[TheBranMan]

First fight, they had a draw. Had one of the judges not committed an error in scoring, Pac would have won.

2nd fight, Pac won by decision.

Just correcting your claims.

How are you correcting my claims, i know full well what the results were. There's no need to be a smartass about it, that doesn't mean my opinion that JMM beat Manny Pacquiao twice, when plenty of people thought JMM won both fights.

He won more rounds in both fights fact, he outlanded Manny Pacquiao in both fights fact, he outlanded Manny Pacquiao in both fights fact. And a majority of the boxing websites and ringside experts thought JMM won fact.

Pac won in a VERY CLOSE fight. FACT.

It's also a fact that after watching the fight, you called it a ROBBERY. That goes the reason why you'll never assent to the FACT that Pac won.

Fact of the matter is, you'll never give credit where credit is due when it comes to Pac.

You are insane buddy. You people will keep claiming he's the greatest of all time naming him ahead of Duran, Ali, etc. I've got news for the fanboys, if the real top 5 ATGs had two decisions like that, they would've given their opponent the trilogy, at least fought until there was a clear winner. Pac lost the first fight - he gets the draw. Then he was beaten even worse in the second - give him the win. All hardcore boxing fans, even the realistic Pac fans know it. Of course he ducked the third fight. Maybe he'll give JMM another shot at 147 when he turns 40

FACT - A judge scored Williams 119-111 in his fight against Martinez last weekend. Just because that happened does that mean it's right?