Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 45

Thread: What did you see different with Khan ?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Will someone explain to me whether Khan must (as in it is his mandatory defense) defend the title against Maidana in his next fight? I'm just not ready to give Khan credit until he handles a puncher. I can just see Khan taking on Paulie if Paulie wins this weekend, which would make it three fights in a row against fighters who don't have much punching power. No one is doubting Khan's boxing ability and he has KO power, but he lacks a chin - qualities that are much like Haye really.
    Why not? He's still shown excellent boxing skills.

    Would you refuse to give Ivan Calderon credit until he knocks someone out for the count, or refuse to give Floyd Maywether credit until he beats someone with as much natural skill as him?

    Even if Khan in the future does fall once more to a big puncher it does not discredit his other wins or mean he deserves no credit for his speed, power and skill.

    Every fighter has strengths and weakeness and will struggle against certain types of opponents.

    Not every fighter is perfect. Obviously.

    Khan has looked good thus far and I thought he handled himself with class in and outside the ring this last Saturday. I guess to me he is just a bit overated on this board.

    He is only 22 and he has the time to develop a style which emphasizes defense and minimizes his exposure to big punches. He doesn't need to rush into anything.

    However, not being able to handle punchers, isn't just an insignificant weakness, it's a downfall.

    I'd like to see him in with Maidana, Urango, or Campbell, but maybe he isn't ready for those tests yet. It wouldn't be a big deal, like I said, he is only 22.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    You cannot tell after one fight and a one round blow out but since his defeat he has improved, tucked his chin, can be disciplined and getting more confident. Speed was always there and experience he will get in time.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Will someone explain to me whether Khan must (as in it is his mandatory defense) defend the title against Maidana in his next fight? I'm just not ready to give Khan credit until he handles a puncher. I can just see Khan taking on Paulie if Paulie wins this weekend, which would make it three fights in a row against fighters who don't have much punching power. No one is doubting Khan's boxing ability and he has KO power, but he lacks a chin - qualities that are much like Haye really.
    Why not? He's still shown excellent boxing skills.

    Would you refuse to give Ivan Calderon credit until he knocks someone out for the count, or refuse to give Floyd Maywether credit until he beats someone with as much natural skill as him?

    Even if Khan in the future does fall once more to a big puncher it does not discredit his other wins or mean he deserves no credit for his speed, power and skill.

    Every fighter has strengths and weakeness and will struggle against certain types of opponents.

    Not every fighter is perfect. Obviously.

    Khan has looked good thus far and I thought he handled himself with class in and outside the ring this last Saturday. I guess to me he is just a bit overated on this board.

    He is only 22 and he has the time to develop a style which emphasizes defense and minimizes his exposure to big punches. He doesn't need to rush into anything.

    However, not being able to handle punchers, isn't just an insignificant weakness, it's a downfall.

    I'd like to see him in with Maidana, Urango, or Campbell, but maybe he isn't ready for those tests yet. It wouldn't be a big deal, like I said, he is only 22.

    Seriously? By whom? It seems the vast majority of fightfans regard him as a joke, the majority dislike him, some plain hate, most think he's completely chinny and will be exposed when he moves up to world class.

    I actually think Khan is seriously underated by most.

    I rate him highly of course, but I don't think I overrate him at all. I believe he has the potential to be great, his chin and vulnerability is a factor and he could implode at any moment in a fight, but he's improving massively and I think has as good a shot as any young prospect of making it to the very top.

    I think that's an accurate assessment not an over estimation, and I probably am Amir's most vocal fan on these boards.

    I have never heard a single person really go overboard on Amir's potential on this board, or on tv. I think he gets a lot of attention certainly, but I don't think anybody overates him, not even Duke McKenzie and Barry McGuigan.

    They just tell us he's a terrific prospect with great potentional, which he is.

    I think people confuse attention with overrating.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    933
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    If the guy's got a weak chin, and it appears he does, he will probably always have a weak chin. He can't help it so it's kinda unfair to condemn him for it. That doesn't mean he can't be a great fighter, he just has to develop a solid defense and a style that protects that chin.
    "The refusal to respect one's enemies is a weakness, a stinginess of heart." Frederick the Great

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Will someone explain to me whether Khan must (as in it is his mandatory defense) defend the title against Maidana in his next fight? I'm just not ready to give Khan credit until he handles a puncher. I can just see Khan taking on Paulie if Paulie wins this weekend, which would make it three fights in a row against fighters who don't have much punching power. No one is doubting Khan's boxing ability and he has KO power, but he lacks a chin - qualities that are much like Haye really.
    Why not? He's still shown excellent boxing skills.

    Would you refuse to give Ivan Calderon credit until he knocks someone out for the count, or refuse to give Floyd Maywether credit until he beats someone with as much natural skill as him?

    Even if Khan in the future does fall once more to a big puncher it does not discredit his other wins or mean he deserves no credit for his speed, power and skill.

    Every fighter has strengths and weakeness and will struggle against certain types of opponents.

    Not every fighter is perfect. Obviously.

    Khan has looked good thus far and I thought he handled himself with class in and outside the ring this last Saturday. I guess to me he is just a bit overated on this board.

    He is only 22 and he has the time to develop a style which emphasizes defense and minimizes his exposure to big punches. He doesn't need to rush into anything.

    However, not being able to handle punchers, isn't just an insignificant weakness, it's a downfall.

    I'd like to see him in with Maidana, Urango, or Campbell, but maybe he isn't ready for those tests yet. It wouldn't be a big deal, like I said, he is only 22.


    This sums up how legitimate Khan's claim to being WORLD CHAMPION , he is WBA champion but not ready for certain contenders ? lol bullshit politics.
    For me he needs to fight a legit world class puncher and showcase his skills , and win , someone like Maidana , then he will show his true colours.Its easy to look improved against lesser fighters.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Why not? He's still shown excellent boxing skills.

    Would you refuse to give Ivan Calderon credit until he knocks someone out for the count, or refuse to give Floyd Maywether credit until he beats someone with as much natural skill as him?

    Even if Khan in the future does fall once more to a big puncher it does not discredit his other wins or mean he deserves no credit for his speed, power and skill.

    Every fighter has strengths and weakeness and will struggle against certain types of opponents.

    Not every fighter is perfect. Obviously.

    Khan has looked good thus far and I thought he handled himself with class in and outside the ring this last Saturday. I guess to me he is just a bit overated on this board.

    He is only 22 and he has the time to develop a style which emphasizes defense and minimizes his exposure to big punches. He doesn't need to rush into anything.

    However, not being able to handle punchers, isn't just an insignificant weakness, it's a downfall.

    I'd like to see him in with Maidana, Urango, or Campbell, but maybe he isn't ready for those tests yet. It wouldn't be a big deal, like I said, he is only 22.
    This sums up how legitimate Khan's claim to being WORLD CHAMPION , he is WBA champion but not ready for certain contenders ? lol bullshit politics.
    For me he needs to fight a legit world class puncher and showcase his skills , and win , someone like Maidana , then he will show his true colours.Its easy to look improved against lesser fighters.
    I agree with this red stuff above.

    Khan is supposedly a champion now and in the big league. But I haven't seen him beat a top fighter yet (and don't even go near the Barrera fight!). Khan needs to face someone decent, but I don't think he will. We will see Warren milk him as long as possible before the inevitable throw into the wolves. Might be a good while yet.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post


    Not every fighter is perfect. Obviously.

    Khan has looked good thus far and I thought he handled himself with class in and outside the ring this last Saturday. I guess to me he is just a bit overated on this board.

    He is only 22 and he has the time to develop a style which emphasizes defense and minimizes his exposure to big punches. He doesn't need to rush into anything.

    However, not being able to handle punchers, isn't just an insignificant weakness, it's a downfall.

    I'd like to see him in with Maidana, Urango, or Campbell, but maybe he isn't ready for those tests yet. It wouldn't be a big deal, like I said, he is only 22.
    This sums up how legitimate Khan's claim to being WORLD CHAMPION , he is WBA champion but not ready for certain contenders ? lol bullshit politics.
    For me he needs to fight a legit world class puncher and showcase his skills , and win , someone like Maidana , then he will show his true colours.Its easy to look improved against lesser fighters.
    I agree with this red stuff above.

    Khan is supposedly a champion now and in the big league. But I haven't seen him beat a top fighter yet (and don't even go near the Barrera fight!). Khan needs to face someone decent, but I don't think he will. We will see Warren milk him as long as possible before the inevitable throw into the wolves. Might be a good while yet.
    The fault is with the alphabet "world" titles not with Khan. Loads of "world" champions are not the top of their division.

    Recently some Barrera fans were happy to see he has a chance of becoming "world" champion again by fighting Paulus Moses for his WBA title. There are 7 fighters ranked above the "world" champ according to The Ring, and Saddo ratings doesn't even have him listed
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post

    This sums up how legitimate Khan's claim to being WORLD CHAMPION , he is WBA champion but not ready for certain contenders ? lol bullshit politics.
    For me he needs to fight a legit world class puncher and showcase his skills , and win , someone like Maidana , then he will show his true colours.Its easy to look improved against lesser fighters.
    I agree with this red stuff above.

    Khan is supposedly a champion now and in the big league. But I haven't seen him beat a top fighter yet (and don't even go near the Barrera fight!). Khan needs to face someone decent, but I don't think he will. We will see Warren milk him as long as possible before the inevitable throw into the wolves. Might be a good while yet.
    The fault is with the alphabet "world" titles not with Khan. Loads of "world" champions are not the top of their division.

    Recently some Barrera fans were happy to see he has a chance of becoming "world" champion again by fighting Paulus Moses for his WBA title. There are 7 fighters ranked above the "world" champ according to The Ring, and Saddo ratings doesn't even have him listed
    I have abstained from too much of that talk regarding Barrera, so will stay quiet on that.

    As for Khan...Well, I do partly blame him. He gets hated because he fights nobody good. We can blame the belts, or we can blame Warren or we can blame Khan. Khan is the man signing the contracts so he is the man I will gun for.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post

    I agree with this red stuff above.

    Khan is supposedly a champion now and in the big league. But I haven't seen him beat a top fighter yet (and don't even go near the Barrera fight!). Khan needs to face someone decent, but I don't think he will. We will see Warren milk him as long as possible before the inevitable throw into the wolves. Might be a good while yet.
    The fault is with the alphabet "world" titles not with Khan. Loads of "world" champions are not the top of their division.

    Recently some Barrera fans were happy to see he has a chance of becoming "world" champion again by fighting Paulus Moses for his WBA title. There are 7 fighters ranked above the "world" champ according to The Ring, and Saddo ratings doesn't even have him listed
    I have abstained from too much of that talk regarding Barrera, so will stay quiet on that.

    As for Khan...Well, I do partly blame him. He gets hated because he fights nobody good. We can blame the belts, or we can blame Warren or we can blame Khan. Khan is the man signing the contracts so he is the man I will gun for.
    Hold up...

    In July he won the "world" title.

    In December he defended it against his no.1 rated mandatory contender.

    What has he done wrong there?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post

    The fault is with the alphabet "world" titles not with Khan. Loads of "world" champions are not the top of their division.

    Recently some Barrera fans were happy to see he has a chance of becoming "world" champion again by fighting Paulus Moses for his WBA title. There are 7 fighters ranked above the "world" champ according to The Ring, and Saddo ratings doesn't even have him listed
    I have abstained from too much of that talk regarding Barrera, so will stay quiet on that.

    As for Khan...Well, I do partly blame him. He gets hated because he fights nobody good. We can blame the belts, or we can blame Warren or we can blame Khan. Khan is the man signing the contracts so he is the man I will gun for.
    Hold up...

    In July he won the "world" title.

    In December he defended it against his no.1 rated mandatory contender.

    What has he done wrong there?
    As i said this is not a dig at Khan , all im saying is he wont have proved anything to me , until he beats a world class puncher , until then he will always have a glass jaw , and the only puncher he has fought knocked him out.
    Khan is skillful , and a nice kid , but has proved nothing we didnt already know, he has improved but lets see him fight a puncher next then ? that ok with you Fenster ?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    I read an article recently with a number of quotes from Freddie.

    Freddie stated the first thing he worked on was reducing Kahns muscle mass, thus increasing his flexibilty and speed
    091

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What did you see different with Khan ?

    On another part of the aftermath , did anyone else notice the Naseem Hamed shaped BLIMP that Khan and his handlers had with them in the ring after the fight ?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Khan.
    By andykopgod in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 08:47 PM
  2. Say what you like - Khan should never have won
    By Howlin Mad Missy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 02:18 PM
  3. More Khan C**P
    By chip in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 06:35 PM
  4. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 05:02 PM
  5. Khan SKY PPV
    By Fenster in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-15-2008, 06:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing