Roach likes the sound of PAC/JMM III..

[ElTerribleMorales]

i didn't see it that way , along with many people, i had pac winning 6 rounds in each fight . it was the commentary that swayed some people towards Marquez.

yeah. it was the commentaries that made it seem like a robbery. I could very well remember then when ICB made a comment that it was a robbery just after watching the fight then later on retracting his words after he saw the fight again. The fights were so close that anyone could have won the fights. It just happened that Pacquaio was flooring JMM convincingly that the judges gave the nod to Pac.

might come as a shock to you, but there are people who can think on their own and aren't just mindless drones that go with whatever everybody else says, i had Marquez as a clear winner in both fights, and i'm not the only one. and it has nothing to do with the commentators

[brucelee]

i didn't see it that way , along with many people, i had pac winning 6 rounds in each fight . it was the commentary that swayed some people towards Marquez.

yeah. it was the commentaries that made it seem like a robbery. I could very well remember then when ICB made a comment that it was a robbery just after watching the fight then later on retracting his words after he saw the fight again. The fights were so close that anyone could have won the fights. It just happened that Pacquaio was flooring JMM convincingly that the judges gave the nod to Pac.

might come as a shock to you, but there are people who can think on their own and aren't just mindless drones that go with whatever everybody else says, i had Marquez as a clear winner in both fights, and i'm not the only one. and it has nothing to do with the commentators

I will stick with my unbiased opinion that the fight could go either way.

So I better leave the decision to the judges as many will agree with me that it was a close fight.

Those were not robberies. FACT.

[Snakey]

yeah. it was the commentaries that made it seem like a robbery. I could very well remember then when ICB made a comment that it was a robbery just after watching the fight then later on retracting his words after he saw the fight again. The fights were so close that anyone could have won the fights. It just happened that Pacquaio was flooring JMM convincingly that the judges gave the nod to Pac.

might come as a shock to you, but there are people who can think on their own and aren't just mindless drones that go with whatever everybody else says, i had Marquez as a clear winner in both fights, and i'm not the only one. and it has nothing to do with the commentators

I will stick with my unbiased opinion that the fight could go either way.

So I better leave the decision to the judges as many will agree with me that it was a close fight.

Those were not robberies. FACT.

Dude no offence but I really wouldnt call you unbiased towards anything to do with pac.

[mattboxingfan]

Marquez won both fights!.....Bob Arum has connections

[miron_lang]

Marquez won both fights!.....Bob Arum has connections

HAHAHAHAHHAHA

Bob Arum was Juan's promoter in the 1st fight while pac is still with Murad .

I agree Juan won more rounds. 13 rounds to 11 rounds for Pacquiao. But Pac had 4 extra pts for 4 knockdowns. Techinically he won both fights because of the scoring error. but the records says 1W 1D for Pac and 1D 1L for JMM.

[SRR]

yeah. it was the commentaries that made it seem like a robbery. I could very well remember then when ICB made a comment that it was a robbery just after watching the fight then later on retracting his words after he saw the fight again. The fights were so close that anyone could have won the fights. It just happened that Pacquaio was flooring JMM convincingly that the judges gave the nod to Pac.

might come as a shock to you, but there are people who can think on their own and aren't just mindless drones that go with whatever everybody else says, i had Marquez as a clear winner in both fights, and i'm not the only one. and it has nothing to do with the commentators

I will stick with my unbiased opinion that the fight could go either way.

So I better leave the decision to the judges as many [pac nuthuggers] will agree with me that it was a close fight.

Those were not robberies. FACT.

As the biggest pacfan here, hear me fellow pac nuthuggers!

Taken from this thread: http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...d-testing.html

[Rantcatrat]

Is there any proof that Marquez can't be effective at 140? He wasn't effective at 145 fighting a guy who weighed 147, but to my knowledge he has never fought anyone at 140?

[Pugilistic]

I like the sound of it as well, but only it is is at 135. Any higher and the fight is pointless as Marquez just isn't effective at that weight.

Even at 135, Marquez was pushed to his limits and had to win fights based on his superior skills alone.

[Master]

Roach will dictate it at 147lb.

[JonnyFolds]

I am thinking more like <155

[:::PSL:::]

Foreman @ 154 for 8th div title, or Marquez @ 135 for 5th lineal.