
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Wow Majesty got his dick stuck up Mayweather's arse would never have guessed that

.
Go do a little reserch on the urine side of things 
.
Maybe you should have. From a drug doctor's point of view
Ask the Doc: With steroid and HGH testing, is blood or urine best? | MMAjunkie.com
Here's a quote about which is better
Anyway, urine testing is cheaper, less invasive (no needle stick required) and has fewer potential complications (not unless peeing on your hand is considered a complication) than blood testing.
Blood screening is more sensitive
(more likely to detect a banned substance),
detects more banned substances, and is more difficult to beat through "masking" methods. Blood screening is the current standard for detecting abnormally elevated levels of synthetic human growth hormone (HGH).
Feel free to read all of that. Urine testing is easier to mask then blood testing, as has been proven before and will be again.
And here's another quote from another article
Travis Tygart, the CEO of USADA, told Kevin Iole of Yahoo! Sports that
both urine and blood tests are needed to determine if a fighter is clean.
"There
is no urine-based tested for human-growth hormone," Tygart said.
"It doesn’t show up in the urine. It’s only a
blood-based test. That’s true of a number of prohibited substances, particularly those that would enhance and aid a boxer.”
Maybe you're the one that should have done research on Urine and Blood.
Bookmarks