Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    Yeah I think he had a fair idea that Pacquiao wouldn't want to do it, and I think that's why he did it.

    The purse split point you make - I agree, but it's easy to see through. Those numbers always come out and the people can see who was being ridiculous.


    I think that at the end of the day, Floyd got what he wanted - he doesn't have to fight Pacquiao, and because of the way he went about it only half the world thinks he ducked him, the other half think Pac is on PED's. Whereas the whole world would have knew he ducked him if he had demanded 70 per cent of the pot...
    But you have bias and that's speculation, when has Mayweather EVER started negotiations and not gone through with them? If he's ducking fighters, which admittedly there are some fighters out there he did duck, he simply didn't entertain the offers. Why make this big to-do at all? It would be a waste of money and time.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    829
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    Yeah I think he had a fair idea that Pacquiao wouldn't want to do it, and I think that's why he did it.

    The purse split point you make - I agree, but it's easy to see through. Those numbers always come out and the people can see who was being ridiculous.


    I think that at the end of the day, Floyd got what he wanted - he doesn't have to fight Pacquiao, and because of the way he went about it only half the world thinks he ducked him, the other half think Pac is on PED's. Whereas the whole world would have knew he ducked him if he had demanded 70 per cent of the pot...
    But you have bias and that's speculation, when has Mayweather EVER started negotiations and not gone through with them? If he's ducking fighters, which admittedly there are some fighters out there he did duck, he simply didn't entertain the offers. Why make this big to-do at all? It would be a waste of money and time.
    coz floyd was forced to entertain the pacquiao fight due to fans/promoters demands

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by zbolt View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    Yeah I think he had a fair idea that Pacquiao wouldn't want to do it, and I think that's why he did it.

    The purse split point you make - I agree, but it's easy to see through. Those numbers always come out and the people can see who was being ridiculous.


    I think that at the end of the day, Floyd got what he wanted - he doesn't have to fight Pacquiao, and because of the way he went about it only half the world thinks he ducked him, the other half think Pac is on PED's. Whereas the whole world would have knew he ducked him if he had demanded 70 per cent of the pot...
    But you have bias and that's speculation, when has Mayweather EVER started negotiations and not gone through with them? If he's ducking fighters, which admittedly there are some fighters out there he did duck, he simply didn't entertain the offers. Why make this big to-do at all? It would be a waste of money and time.
    coz floyd was forced to entertain the pacquiao fight due to fans/promoters demands
    To what end? Tell me what Mayweather would gain from that?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    To what end? Tell me what Mayweather would gain from that?
    to save the reputation(selling point?) he has left. he has some crusaders now doesn't he? hell, he even got some pactards to switch to the other side. very effective in my opinion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by erik_corrales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    To what end? Tell me what Mayweather would gain from that?
    to save the reputation(selling point?) he has left. he has some crusaders now doesn't he? hell, he even got some pactards to switch to the other side. very effective in my opinion.
    That's conspiracy theory what you're saying right there.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erik_corrales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    To what end? Tell me what Mayweather would gain from that?
    to save the reputation(selling point?) he has left. he has some crusaders now doesn't he? hell, he even got some pactards to switch to the other side. very effective in my opinion.
    That's conspiracy theory what you're saying right there.
    and your point is? come on, this is boxing, the business.

    all i'm saying is that's how it appears to be right now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Quote Originally Posted by erik_corrales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erik_corrales View Post

    to save the reputation(selling point?) he has left. he has some crusaders now doesn't he? hell, he even got some pactards to switch to the other side. very effective in my opinion.
    That's conspiracy theory what you're saying right there.
    and your point is? come on, this is boxing, the business.

    all i'm saying is that's how it appears to be right now.
    Really? It appears to you, that Mayweather would throw away most money he could make in a single event in his life, so that he could keep up his reputation to make WAAAYYY less money fighting other people?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    2,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1518
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The definitive Mayweather/Pac article

    Yeah Killersheep - he couldn't realistically ignore Pac after the way he destroyed Cotto.


    Now, Mayweather has played this so well that he gets to avoid Pac with only half the world thinking he's at fault. Expertly played Mr Mayweather.


    But what gets me is how so many people who are inside boxing - smart people like Bernstein, Hauser and Rafael (people with more insight into the inner workings of the game than you or I have) can think something is rotten here yet you completely disregard it.


    I don't know what's going on, or what goes on inside Mayweathers head. But I've enjoyed boxing for 25 years without really worrying about drugs. Now thanks to Floyd, I'll look at every fight I've enjoyed in my life and wonder if someone was injecting HGH up their arse whilst in training, AND I get to miss out on the one fight I (and everyone else) is dying to see.

    For that, I'm pissed off.

    Boxing's drug testing procedures were FINE FOR EVERYBODY until a few fucking weeks ago. Nobody gave a shit.

    Now if what Floyd has done cleans up the sport of boxing, then great. I just wish he could have waited til after March 13 before he did it.
    "I take good care of my people. I like to inflict permanent psychological damage."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. A definitive answer.....Kessler vs. Pavlik
    By donnydarkoIRL in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 08-11-2008, 11:46 PM
  2. Floyd Mayweather Jr. (WSJ article)
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 05:59 PM
  3. Good Mayweather Article.
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-03-2007, 11:25 PM
  4. Definitive Joe Calzaghe Interview
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 11:21 PM
  5. Article written by a MAYWEATHER fan!!
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 02:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing