Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 74

Thread: Why would dirrel need to act, he was going to win anyway...

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    490
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    832
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why would dirrel need to act, he was going to win anyway...

    Quote Originally Posted by GuyIncognito76 View Post
    It's hard to say for certain, but it did look like he was playing. The bit where he was being interviewed and he thought he'd lost did appear to be akin to a tee-totaller pretending to be drunk.

    I'm not saying he was acting, I guess only he knows for sure -the punch didn't seem to catch him flush, and he'd been hit with better shots in the fight, but I will accept that he wasn't ready for it.

    I did like the balls of Abrahams in his interview though
    The punch caught him flush. There's video with slow motion replay.

    Anyway, let's say, for the sake of argument that Dirrell was acting. Are you saying that the DQ should only be given if a fighter is illegally KOd? I dont think there is a rule saying that one must be hit while down + almost be KOd from the shot for a DQ to be taken into consideration.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Llandudno
    Posts
    366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    924
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why would dirrel need to act, he was going to win anyway...

    Quote Originally Posted by ninjaspy3 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GuyIncognito76 View Post
    It's hard to say for certain, but it did look like he was playing. The bit where he was being interviewed and he thought he'd lost did appear to be akin to a tee-totaller pretending to be drunk.

    I'm not saying he was acting, I guess only he knows for sure -the punch didn't seem to catch him flush, and he'd been hit with better shots in the fight, but I will accept that he wasn't ready for it.

    I did like the balls of Abrahams in his interview though
    The punch caught him flush. There's video with slow motion replay.

    Anyway, let's say, for the sake of argument that Dirrell was acting. Are you saying that the DQ should only be given if a fighter is illegally KOd? I dont think there is a rule saying that one must be hit while down + almost be KOd from the shot for a DQ to be taken into consideration.
    I didn't say I disagreed with the DQ. Dirrell was clearly down and he was hit by a good punch. The issue is whether, or not, Dirrell was play acting. The Ref was shocking; he missed (or miss-called) two knockdowns and should probably waved the fight off as soon as Abrahams hit him -Dirrell's reaction appears to be the only reason the fight was called off (of course, so useless was the ref that he may have been intending to call off the fight anyway, but just wasn't very decisive)
    You do a commercial and you're off the artistic roll call... forever
    --Bill Hicks

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. What Dirrel does that i hate.
    By The Boxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-22-2009, 05:21 PM
  2. Dirrel appears to be somewhat loopy
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-16-2009, 02:13 AM
  3. Froch vows to knock out Dirrel
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 07:03 PM
  4. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 12:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing