Ok - Let's assume Direll wasn't acting...I don't give a shit what any of your signatures say or how you define somebody "knocked out" should be acting (

), the truth is NOBODY knows for sure whether he was acting apart from Direll himself.
So, yeah the ref was bad for not seeing those knockdowns...They were pretty obvious to me and everyone else BUT that call was the only call that could have been made. If he took a point off of AA and then ordered Direll to carry on because he felt he was acting, it would have been the most horrific decision of all time (Especially if the ref was wrong). What if it led to Direll's death? I'm sure Cole would be getting twice the amount of shit he is getting now.
He made the right choice, Direll was owning AA anyway...he had his legs with him still and
was clearly going to ride out the 11th and 12th..what's the problem??
Bookmarks