Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post

The version of Lewis that fought Bruno is not the version of Lewis that made him great..

Just to be fair to Lennox...

To answer the question though IMO Bruno would win after some rough moments...
I don't know Lewis would have been about 28/29 then and was probably in his absolute prime.

After that he started to get a bit lax resulting in his two KO losses.

Lewis in 93/94 was probably a peak Lewis. The big name fighters he beat after that were all pretty much past their best.

You are going to try and seriously say the version of Lewis that fought Bruno was the best version of him?

You speak of nothing you know about....

Golota had just been named the terror of HW boxing with his 2 beatdowns of Bowe...Bowe was going to lose if not for the DQ..

Tua had only lost to Ibeabuchi

Grant undefeated and being proclaimed the future of HW boxing

Botha had only lost to Tyson (Who he was beating tiol he got caught) and

Moorer (who was only beaten once at the time buy upset over Foreman)

Mercer was dangerous had never been down at this point

Akinwande was undefeated

Morrison was on a 9 fight win streak

Briggs was well Briggs never mind...

Holyfield had lost only to Moorer and Bowe..

Sorry the 93/94 being the best Lewis does not fly
I think you're overating all of those guys to be honest Daxx.

You only have to look at Lewis from that time and compare him to the Lewis of a few years later to see he was at least in his physical prime.
Yes he had some of his biggest wins later in his career but you can't convince me that he wasn't in his physical prime from around 28/30 years old

Bruno fought a Lennox Lewis in his physical prime. Go and rewatch the fights, just look at his body back then, he was a lean physical speciman.