Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40

Thread: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    It's an undeniable fact that in the year 2002 Hopkins turned down a huge career high payday of $3million to face Joe Calzaghe. He initially accepted the challenge before shamefully demanding $6 million to face Joe, knowing full well that $6 million ended the negotiations.

    The question is - why did Hopkins duck Calzaghe?

    Discuss
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    A Hop-Cal thread 30 mins and no reply. Shocking.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1985
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    He couldn't face getting beat by a white boy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North of South
    Posts
    2,693
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1045
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    It's an undeniable fact that in the year 2002 Hopkins turned down a huge career high payday of $3million to face Joe Calzaghe. He initially accepted the challenge before shamefully demanding $6 million to face Joe, knowing full well that $6 million ended the negotiations.

    The question is - why did Hopkins duck Calzaghe?

    Discuss

    For me it's quite simple - He Knew He would lose - why else make such demands

    He certainly would of stood a better chance than he did when he finally faced him at LHW. Im not saying he would of won, but maybe he would not of resorted to dirty filthy tactics which he did in the fight they did have
    Hidden Content SADDO'S FIGHT NIGHT RD4 CHAMPION, TAKING ON ALL COMERS ! Hidden Content

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Utterly great replies.

    1. Bothered by the pressure of losing to a whitey.

    2. Obviously scared of losing.

    3. It's highly doubtful Hopkins would have lasted long enough against a 2002 Calzaghe to use dirty filthy cheating shameful tactics.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,101
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    I think he was waiting for ODH and a huge pay day against an easier opponent.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1439
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    Did you mean? I dont blame JC for ducking ,RJJ/hopkins/toney far better paydays for an easier nights work back then...

    Roy's the only one that fought all of them, two in his younger/prime days....
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    1,419
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1487
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Could have been he knew there was an easier fight against a smaller ODLH for more money like Master said,
    that would make alot of sense,
    it would have been good to see them fight with Hopkins not John Ruizing his ass, I think Joe still takes him though...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    1,419
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1487
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    Did you mean? I dont blame JC for ducking ,RJJ/hopkins/toney far better paydays for an easier nights work back then...

    Roy's the only one that fought all of them, two in his younger/prime days....

    In fairness they are all to blame, RJJ,Hopkins and Toney wouldn't go to the UK and Joe wouldn't go to the States, can't blame one more than the other, none of them were keen to take the risk. Roy may have fought Hop and Toney but he was having none of DM and vice versa... just a shame we missed out on a few great prime fights

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1518
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    In short the answer is Hopkins in a greedy money grabing cnut who does not like it when he does not get his way!!!!
    Balls

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    Did you mean? I dont blame JC for ducking ,RJJ/hopkins/toney far better paydays for an easier nights work back then...

    Roy's the only one that fought all of them, two in his younger/prime days....

    In fairness they are all to blame, RJJ,Hopkins and Toney wouldn't go to the UK and Joe wouldn't go to the States, can't blame one more than the other, none of them were keen to take the risk. Roy may have fought Hop and Toney but he was having none of DM and vice versa... just a shame we missed out on a few great prime fights

    No no, DM sat ringside and watched Roy stop virgil hill with the body shot. So he was willing to travel but after he saw RJJ up close in action he hauled ass and never returned...

    P.S. no one even comes close to thinking that DM stood a chance against RJJ so what does it matter that he didnt fight him....
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    1,419
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1487
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    Did you mean? I dont blame JC for ducking ,RJJ/hopkins/toney far better paydays for an easier nights work back then...

    Roy's the only one that fought all of them, two in his younger/prime days....

    In fairness they are all to blame, RJJ,Hopkins and Toney wouldn't go to the UK and Joe wouldn't go to the States, can't blame one more than the other, none of them were keen to take the risk. Roy may have fought Hop and Toney but he was having none of DM and vice versa... just a shame we missed out on a few great prime fights

    No no, DM sat ringside and watched Roy stop virgil hill with the body shot. So he was willing to travel but after he saw RJJ up close in action he hauled ass and never returned...

    P.S. no one even comes close to thinking that DM stood a chance against RJJ so what does it matter that he didnt fight him....

    When DM was undefeated there was alot of people who thought he had the best chance to beat Roy... He didn't want to fight in the States and Roy wouldn't go to Germany, just because he travelled to watch doesn't mean he was willing to travel to fight.

  14. #14
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    Did you mean? I dont blame JC for ducking ,RJJ/hopkins/toney far better paydays for an easier nights work back then...

    Roy's the only one that fought all of them, two in his younger/prime days....

    In fairness they are all to blame, RJJ,Hopkins and Toney wouldn't go to the UK and Joe wouldn't go to the States, can't blame one more than the other, none of them were keen to take the risk. Roy may have fought Hop and Toney but he was having none of DM and vice versa... just a shame we missed out on a few great prime fights

    No no, DM sat ringside and watched Roy stop virgil hill with the body shot. So he was willing to travel but after he saw RJJ up close in action he hauled ass and never returned...

    P.S. no one even comes close to thinking that DM stood a chance against RJJ so what does it matter that he didnt fight him....

    When DM was undefeated there was alot of people who thought he had the best chance to beat Roy... He didn't want to fight in the States and Roy wouldn't go to Germany, just because he travelled to watch doesn't mean he was willing to travel to fight.
    Put it this way.

    DM struggled twice with Richard Hall, infact the 1st fight was a real battle. RJJ toyed with Richard Hall in one of the most one sided fights ever, DM also lost to Julio Cesar Gonzalez quite handily, yet again another RJJ victim who was embarrassed.

    DM was a good fighter with a good jab and good power, and he was exciting. But his style was quite basic, and he wasn't very fast.

    I just don't see his style being very effective at all vs a prime RJJ.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    1,419
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1487
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins-Calzaghe - A definitive debate. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    the same reason most fighters at that level of their career duck opponents

    he simply divided the pay day and the risk and decided it just wasnt worth it

    I dont blame RJJ/hopkins/toney for ducking JC, far better paydays for an easier nights work back then
    Did you mean? I dont blame JC for ducking ,RJJ/hopkins/toney far better paydays for an easier nights work back then...

    Roy's the only one that fought all of them, two in his younger/prime days....

    In fairness they are all to blame, RJJ,Hopkins and Toney wouldn't go to the UK and Joe wouldn't go to the States, can't blame one more than the other, none of them were keen to take the risk. Roy may have fought Hop and Toney but he was having none of DM and vice versa... just a shame we missed out on a few great prime fights

    No no, DM sat ringside and watched Roy stop virgil hill with the body shot. So he was willing to travel but after he saw RJJ up close in action he hauled ass and never returned...

    P.S. no one even comes close to thinking that DM stood a chance against RJJ so what does it matter that he didnt fight him....

    When DM was undefeated there was alot of people who thought he had the best chance to beat Roy... He didn't want to fight in the States and Roy wouldn't go to Germany, just because he travelled to watch doesn't mean he was willing to travel to fight.
    Put it this way.

    DM struggled twice with Richard Hall, infact the 1st fight was a real battle. RJJ toyed with Richard Hall in one of the most one sided fights ever, DM also lost to Julio Cesar Gonzalez quite handily, yet again another RJJ victim who was embarrassed.

    DM was a good fighter with a good jab and good power, and he was exciting. But his style was quite basic, and he wasn't very fast.

    I just don't see his style being very effective at all vs a prime RJJ.

    Im not saying DM would have beaten Roy, infact I think Roy would have won easily enough, but at the time it was alot bigger fight than some of the fights Roy took. All my point is Roy, Joe, Toney, Hop, DM, Eubank ect.. all could have challenged themselves more by going overseas for fights but took the easier options...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-08-2010, 05:04 PM
  2. The Definitive PED article
    By JazMerkin in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-14-2010, 01:14 AM
  3. The definitive Mayweather/Pac article
    By Greig in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 02-02-2010, 02:51 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-19-2008, 02:23 PM
  5. Definitive Joe Calzaghe Interview
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 11:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing