
Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
ICB

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
ICB

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
Violent Demise

Originally Posted by
Fenster
Complete and utter laughable codswollop.
Was Ali a world champion or rated top ten by the Ring when Berbick beat him? Pathetic comparision. Fact.
All of those fighters listed, whatever your ill-informed opinion of them, were ELITE featherweights (regarded amongst the worlds best) when Naz beat them. Not ONE retired after losing to Naz, some going on to win further titles. Fact.
What more can a fighter do than wipe-out all the most decorated fighters in his particular division?
So, here we are again, for the 4th time, tell me an elite featherweight Naz ducked in his time? Because if you can't name one your arguement is totally invalid. Fact.
I now understand the problem. You don't know the meaning of the word elite. That's become obvious. You think just cuz a fighter held a title than he was elite. So I'm thinking you must of considered Gavin Rees an elite fighter when he was holding his strap, right? It don't work that way. My opinion is my opinion. But assuming people know the true meaning of the word elite it's pretty much universally known that Paul Ingle, Steve Robinson, Cesar Soto and to a point Manuel Medina were never elite fighters even in there primes. That's a fact. The others were elite at one point in there careers. But they were all pretty much shot fighters when Hamed fought them. Tell me what other championship did Tom Johnson win after Hamed? Kevin Kelley. What title he pick up. None to both. As well as to Wilfredo Vazquez and Vuyani Bungu. So what were these other championships these guys won after Hamed that you lied about? There isn't any. None of them did nothing that meant anything after Hamed. Cuz they were all shot fighters when they fought Hamed. Fact.
You don't think I see through you? Your using word Featherweight as a security blanket. Not no more. I'm tearing it up. Junior Jones, Kennedy Mckinney, Erik Morales, Juan Manuel Marquez, Floyd Mayweather, Angel Manfredy were elite fighters (Manfredy being the exception) that expressed interest in facing Hamed. Fact. How many of those did he fight? None. Fact. He ducked one after the other. Another fact. They all didn't all share the same weight class as him. But neither did Bungu. And they still fought. But not against the others. Hamed's ducking skills truly were elite.
Yet again an utterly shocking lack of knowledge
1. Junior Jones and Kennedy Mckinney were elite fighters? They lost to Naz victims (Jones to Ingle and McKinney to Bungu). What makes them any better than the other champions Naz smashed? It is also a FACT that Jones ducked out of the March 11 2000 date that Bungu took (
BBC News | SPORT | Hamed fight called off). We've already established Marquez ducked Naz. Morales lost out to Barrera. Mayweather, Manfredy, Gatti - just about every fighter in the late 90s was linked with Naz because of the MONEY!!! All were operating at bigger weights. There's no evidence that Naz ducked anyone. You are tearing up nothing. Fact.
2. I said SOME went on to win titles (Medina and Ingle). Kelley was deemed good enough to fight both Morales and Barrera after Naz sparked him. I never lie. Fact.
3. You're the one that has the problem understaning the word elite. Did I call anyone anything other than elite in their weight-class? That's a no. Fact.
Junior Jones was past his prime when he fought Paul Ingle though Fenster, his legs were gone and he only just about got past Richard Evatt beforehand. Junior Jones in his prime the one that defeated MAB x2, Orlando Canizalez, John Michael Johnson, Jorge Eliecer Julio. Around that time he was special fighter, its only his chin that let him down and inconsistency.
As for Kennedy McKinney he was just as talented as Junior Jones, he seemed to go down hill pretty quickly i heard it was from drugs. Which is a shame considering how great he looked against Welcome Ncita, MAB, Paul Banke.
I tell you there is one Featherweight Naseem Hamed didn't fight, who i would of loved to have seen him fight and thats Luisito Espinosa. Also a fight with Alejandro Gonzalez would of been entertaining aswell.
Yeah yeah, you don't have to tell me he was past his best, I saw all those fights live.
Jones was KO'd by McKinney on the Naz-Kelley undercard. McKinney was done by Espinosa. Espinosa lost to Soto. Gonzalez lost to Medina.
All these guys LOST during Naz's pomp to his VICTIMS. So none can be called "elite" using VD's argument.
Well i don't know all the history considering i was young, but im pretty sure Luisito Espinosa vs Naseem Hamed could of happened at some point. Luisito Espinosa had a nice little run at Featherweight, destroying two highly regarded fighters in Kennedy McKinney, Alejando Gonzalez.
Also the two wins over Manuel Medina, Naseem Hamed chose to fight Manuel Medina rather than Luisito Espinosa.
I've seen quite a few Luisito Espinosa fights, and he was pretty good at one point. With a hell of a left hook, he would of been dangerous fight for Naseem Hamed.
Had the fight of taken place between 1995-1998.
Im not saying anyone avoided anyone, you asked an elite Featherweight Naseem Hamed could of fought. And he could of fought Luisito Espinosa between 1995-1998.
Espinosa could have got a fight with Naz if he hadn't lost his mandatory to Soto in 1999. Obviously Naz fought the winner. During 95 and 98 Naz beat Johnson, Kelley and Vazquez. Is Espinosa rated any higher than those fighters?
Naz would get no credit for beating Espinosa - using VD's argument.
Well Luisito Espinosa did beat Cesar Soto in there 1st meeting, i think his prime was pretty short. And he aged quickly because after the Cesar Soto loss he achieved next to nothing.
I love Kevin Kelley's fighting style, but im not sure how high he was rated at that time. I know it was a big fight because it was Naseem Hamed's 1st fight in the USA. But Kevin Kelley did take a bit of a hammering off Alejandro Gonzalez.
And he had some real up and downers vs Gainer 1, Rivera, and a dull draw with Bones Adams. I would of thought at that time Luisito Espinosa would of been seen as a bigger threat than Kevin Kelley.
Just purely off his demolition job on Kennedy McKinney which was on HBO right ? and his win over Alejandro Gonzalez who was rated quite high at that time.
As for Wilfredo Vasquez i'd really put him in the same class as Luisito Espinosa.
As for Tom Johnson i thought he was seen as shot at that time Fenster ? or atleast past his prime, still a good win for Naseem Hamed because Tom Johnson did have a nice little run.
Again im not saying he should of fought Luisito Espinosa, i've got no problem that he fought Vasquez, Johnson, Kelley, its just personally a fight i would of liked to have seen.
And considering you asked the question i thought, i'd throw that name into the mix.
Also a fight with Alejandro Gonzalez would of been interesting, but Alejandro Gonzalez moved up too fast too Lightweight. When Naseem Hamed was just breaking into top level.
Naseem Hamed also could of fought Freddie Norwood, but Freddie Norwood had an ugly style. And style wise i would of hated to have seen it, but still another name he could of possibility fought.
Bookmarks