Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

[erics44]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

[HattonTheHammer]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

once again spot on erics

rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again

[Rantcatrat]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

once again spot on erics

rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again

that was a great example of his work rate. but, where was it in the Kessler fight? and that was his most recent fight against in my opinion, on that night, an easier opponent. doesn't his hands being held so low, worry you a little against a big puncher, like Abraham?

[HattonTheHammer]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

once again spot on erics

rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again

that was a great example of his work rate. but, where was it in the Kessler fight? and that was his most recent fight against in my opinion, on that night, an easier opponent. doesn't his hands being held so low, worry you a little against a big puncher, like Abraham?

pascal would beat 7 shades of shit out of abraham

froch manned it out that night and went toe to toe with pascal even when he didnt really need too. If you think abraham offers anything in a fight that pascal doesnt your wrong

[Fenster]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

[erics44]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

[HattonTheHammer]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

ignore fenster

other than ice he is the sites froch hater

[erics44]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

ignore fenster

other than ice he is the sites froch hater

Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac

[Fenster]

I never said Froch was easy to beat. I like him.

But the fact is he was decked by Taylor, stunned by Dirrell, shook by Kessler and Pascal and rocked by Aussie Sheep farmer Dale Westerman, so how anyone can possibly think he's gonna walk through Arthur Abraham's bombs i'll never know.

[Rantcatrat]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

either way, my point was mainly that styles make fights. Dirrell showed how to beat Abraham - workrate and defense. keep hooking and punching his gloves and make him miss. froch keeps his hands low and his work rate was a little suspect in the Kessler fight. i thought the Kessler fight was a winnable fight for Froch, like it wasn't about Kessler winning, as much as it was about Froch losing.

[erics44]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

either way, my point was mainly that styles make fights. Dirrell showed how to beat Abraham - workrate and defense. keep hooking and punching his gloves and make him miss. froch keeps his hands low and his work rate was a little suspect in the Kessler fight. i thought the Kessler fight was a winnable fight for Froch, like it wasn't about Kessler winning, as much as it was about Froch losing.

you talk like there is only one way to beat him

Froch is at his best when his opponent wants to trade