Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 62

Thread: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post

    hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.
    taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

    once again spot on erics

    rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

    i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again
    that was a great example of his work rate. but, where was it in the Kessler fight? and that was his most recent fight against in my opinion, on that night, an easier opponent. doesn't his hands being held so low, worry you a little against a big puncher, like Abraham?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1458
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post

    hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.
    taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

    once again spot on erics

    rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

    i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again
    that was a great example of his work rate. but, where was it in the Kessler fight? and that was his most recent fight against in my opinion, on that night, an easier opponent. doesn't his hands being held so low, worry you a little against a big puncher, like Abraham?
    pascal would beat 7 shades of shit out of abraham

    froch manned it out that night and went toe to toe with pascal even when he didnt really need too. If you think abraham offers anything in a fight that pascal doesnt your wrong
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1458
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

    ignore fenster

    other than ice he is the sites froch hater
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

    ignore fenster

    other than ice he is the sites froch hater
    Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

    ignore fenster

    other than ice he is the sites froch hater
    Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
    How ridiculous.

    Froch, with his shitty defense, wouldn't make it past one round against Pacster. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

    ignore fenster

    other than ice he is the sites froch hater
    Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
    How ridiculous.

    Froch, with his shitty defense, wouldn't make it past one round against Pacster. Fact.


    Ice said that he himself could go the distance with pac

    you really think pac would beat froch? jeees man what is wrong with people?
    Last edited by BIG H; 09-21-2010 at 08:09 PM.

  9. #9
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

    ignore fenster

    other than ice he is the sites froch hater
    Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
    Uhh no i said i could possibly last 9 minutes, maybe i couldn't maybe i could. Who cares whats that got to do with anything ?

    And why are you licking up HTH's ass ? are you the same person ? because you both act very alike.

    Infact i know the MOD's may edit this comment which is fine, but i think your both a bunch of wind up merchants, if its not HTH on two accounts.

    You both are totally clueless, and say any old rubbish. To get a rise out of people, honestly its like you two are from totally different planets.

    Audley Harrison can beat the Klitschko brothers, Carl Froch whooped Dirrell/Kessler. And Carl Froch was ahead going into the last round vs Jermain Taylor ?

    Are you kidding me ? do you actually believe this crap you spout out ?

    Im not a hater of Carl Froch at all, i think he's exciting fighter and is willing to fight anybody. But just because he's British i don't totally erase his flaws from my mind, and claim any old bullshit like HTH does.

    The fact is many people believe he lost to Andre Dirrell, Carl Froch didn't "whoop" or "whip" anyone.

    A whooping is James Toney vs Iran Barkley/Joe Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy.

    Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell was a messy/untidy fight, with not alot of action. But Andre Dirrell was able to make it his kind of fight, and Carl Froch struggled to land anything meaningful and was outboxed.

    Against Mikkel Kessler he was outworked/outhustled, if the fight was in any doubt. Mikkel Kessler won the last round to seal the deal, he won the fight. With a good steady body/head attack.

    Against Jermain Taylor he was behind going into the 12th round by atleast 3 rounds, anybody who had Carl Froch ahead. Is a clueless moron, it was a good win for Carl Froch. But to say he didn't need a KO in the last round is utter rubbish.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

    Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

    you talk like froch is easy to beat

    one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

    ignore fenster

    other than ice he is the sites froch hater
    Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
    Uhh no i said i could possibly last 9 minutes, maybe i couldn't maybe i could. Who cares whats that got to do with anything ?

    And why are you licking up HTH's ass ? are you the same person ? because you both act very alike.

    Infact i know the MOD's may edit this comment which is fine, but i think your both a bunch of wind up merchants, if its not HTH on two accounts.

    You both are totally clueless, and say any old rubbish. To get a rise out of people, honestly its like you two are from totally different planets.

    Audley Harrison can beat the Klitschko brothers, Carl Froch whooped Dirrell/Kessler. And Carl Froch was ahead going into the last round vs Jermain Taylor ?

    Are you kidding me ? do you actually believe this crap you spout out ?

    Im not a hater of Carl Froch at all, i think he's exciting fighter and is willing to fight anybody. But just because he's British i don't totally erase his flaws from my mind, and claim any old bullshit like HTH does.

    The fact is many people believe he lost to Andre Dirrell, Carl Froch didn't "whoop" or "whip" anyone.

    A whooping is James Toney vs Iran Barkley/Joe Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy.

    Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell was a messy/untidy fight, with not alot of action. But Andre Dirrell was able to make it his kind of fight, and Carl Froch struggled to land anything meaningful and was outboxed.

    Against Mikkel Kessler he was outworked/outhustled, if the fight was in any doubt. Mikkel Kessler won the last round to seal the deal, he won the fight. With a good steady body/head attack.

    Against Jermain Taylor he was behind going into the 12th round by atleast 3 rounds, anybody who had Carl Froch ahead. Is a clueless moron, it was a good win for Carl Froch. But to say he didn't need a KO in the last round is utter rubbish.

    dude really, i think it is you who are clueless

    admittedly I got carried away with the harrison klit thread mind

    but heres one thing I feel very very strongly about and it has nothing to do with nationality, If dirrell had of been given the decision against froch it would have been an absolute tragedy and a very bad thing for boxing as a whole. I honestly believe the fight should have been stopped after a few rounds or dirrell at least get a very harsh warning. thousands of fans had paid a lot of money to be at the fight and to watch it on pay per view and they didnt pay that money to watch someone run a hold and generally spoil

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    I never said Froch was easy to beat. I like him.

    But the fact is he was decked by Taylor, stunned by Dirrell, shook by Kessler and Pascal and rocked by Aussie Sheep farmer Dale Westerman, so how anyone can possibly think he's gonna walk through Arthur Abraham's bombs i'll never know.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    I never said Froch was easy to beat. I like him.

    But the fact is he was decked by Taylor, stunned by Dirrell, shook by Kessler and Pascal and rocked by Aussie Sheep farmer Dale Westerman, so how anyone can possibly think he's gonna walk through Arthur Abraham's bombs i'll never know.
    people keep saying this stunned by dirrell, i dont remember that happening, i dont remember him shook by pascal or kessler either

    but it seems to me you do have something against the dude

    an englishman hating an englishman because he has found some success why are englishmen so stoopid?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Froch v Abraham October 2nd in Monaco...
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12-01-2010, 10:53 PM
  2. Froch-Abraham postponed
    By Cressa121 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-11-2010, 04:55 PM
  3. Froch v Abraham in Nottingham 21 st August!
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-09-2010, 05:38 PM
  4. Froch v Abraham
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-01-2010, 01:47 AM
  5. Froch v Kessler 24th April not 17th 2010
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 09:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing