Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

[erics44]

Froch 'Whipped' Dirrell Not in the figh I was watching

And since when has Fighter 'A' beat Fighter 'B' so can't beta Fighter 'D' logic ever been relevant?

he said froch whopped dirrell not whipped, theres a difference

and he whopped him good, if the ref had of had any bottle dirrell would have been DQ'd after 5 rounds for running and holding

[BIG H]

Froch 'Whipped' Dirrell Not in the figh I was watching

And since when has Fighter 'A' beat Fighter 'B' so can't beta Fighter 'D' logic ever been relevant?

he said froch whopped dirrell not whipped, theres a difference

and he whopped him good, if the ref had of had any bottle dirrell would have been DQ'd after 5 rounds for running and holding

Lol, what's the difference then?

...and whatever you think about the outcome of that fiight there was no "Whopping" or "Whipping" by anybody

[Rantcatrat]

YAWN!!!!!!!


More blatant froch hating on this site i see, and would you believe its the very same ones who choose to hate on the likes of ortiz, khan, de-gale etc

froch whopped dirrell - dirrell whooped abraham

how do we possibly come to the conclusion that abraham whoops froch??

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of his work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out. However, Taylor and Froch have very different styles. I thought Froch's workrate wasn't high enough in the Kessler fight, and from what I've seen to beat Abraham, a high work rate is essential. Plus, Froch has a horrible habit of keeping his hands low, against a fighter like Abraham who has a devestating punch, that could spell trouble. Froch has grown on me a little bit. I'm not counting him out in this one, but I think Abraham should be favored.

[erics44]

Lol, what's the difference then?

...and whatever you think about the outcome of that fiight there was no "Whopping" or "Whipping" by anybody

Whipping is what gay american boys do to each other and whopping is what froch did to dirrell

are you english?

[erics44]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

[BIG H]

Lol, what's the difference then?

...and whatever you think about the outcome of that fiight there was no "Whopping" or "Whipping" by anybody

Whipping is what gay american boys do to each other and whopping is what froch did to dirrell

are you english?

[erics44]

Lol, what's the difference then?

...and whatever you think about the outcome of that fiight there was no "Whopping" or "Whipping" by anybody

Whipping is what gay american boys do to each other and whopping is what froch did to dirrell

are you english?

and you think that dirrell didnt get a whopping? pretty wierd

do you wear a baseball cap back to front anytime?

[HattonTheHammer]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

once again spot on erics

rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again

[Rantcatrat]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

either way, my point was mainly that styles make fights. Dirrell showed how to beat Abraham - workrate and defense. keep hooking and punching his gloves and make him miss. froch keeps his hands low and his work rate was a little suspect in the Kessler fight. i thought the Kessler fight was a winnable fight for Froch, like it wasn't about Kessler winning, as much as it was about Froch losing.

[Rantcatrat]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

once again spot on erics

rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again

that was a great example of his work rate. but, where was it in the Kessler fight? and that was his most recent fight against in my opinion, on that night, an easier opponent. doesn't his hands being held so low, worry you a little against a big puncher, like Abraham?

[erics44]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

either way, my point was mainly that styles make fights. Dirrell showed how to beat Abraham - workrate and defense. keep hooking and punching his gloves and make him miss. froch keeps his hands low and his work rate was a little suspect in the Kessler fight. i thought the Kessler fight was a winnable fight for Froch, like it wasn't about Kessler winning, as much as it was about Froch losing.

you talk like there is only one way to beat him

Froch is at his best when his opponent wants to trade

[HattonTheHammer]

hth - Froch and Dirrell was close anyway you look at it - Froch barely pulled it out. Dirrell beat Abraham because of Dirrell's work rate. Froch and Dirrell have completely different styles. Moreover, Abraham looked a lot better than Froch against Taylor whereas Froch beat Taylor in the last few rounds, Abraham was winning the majority of the fight before he knocked Taylor out.

taylor still had ambition and belief when he fought froch so it doesnt count

once again spot on erics

rantracat - froch doesnt have dirrells work rate

i urge you to go and rewatch froch-pascal then tell me that again

that was a great example of his work rate. but, where was it in the Kessler fight? and that was his most recent fight against in my opinion, on that night, an easier opponent. doesn't his hands being held so low, worry you a little against a big puncher, like Abraham?

pascal would beat 7 shades of shit out of abraham

froch manned it out that night and went toe to toe with pascal even when he didnt really need too. If you think abraham offers anything in a fight that pascal doesnt your wrong

[Fenster]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

[erics44]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

[HattonTheHammer]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

ignore fenster

other than ice he is the sites froch hater