Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 76

Thread: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    852
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    I think anybody complaining Marquez was robbed in the John fight might actually want to go watch it first. There was no way he was robbed. It was a close, hard to score fight that could have gone either way. That's not getting robbed.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1459
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Pac is obviously running the show now. If I were him I would price myself out rediculously . Reading these articles, it seems to me JMM is deperate to have the trilogy. I wouldn't be surprise if he accepts a 90/10 purse split deal in favor of Pac for a 147 showdown.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    It was just a failed negotiation.

    Pac or JMM aint scared of fighting anybody. Only idiots would say these two are afriad of fighting when they've already gone at it twice.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for
    Very interesting. Not calling you a liar, but do you have any links to confirm that JMM was lowball in the rematch?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    PSL,

    WTF do you mean by saying pacquiao "is running the show now"? when did the mythical p4p list become a world title? i think pacquiao and his fans are taking this p4p ranking a little too literal and serious! when hopkins was p4p 1, or when others were number one p4p, you didn't hear them say they're running the show now. and so what if he's no.1 of the "p4p world title", fans could give a fuck about that. they just want to see good fights not some prima donna bragging that "he's in control now", bullshit.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    PSL,

    WTF do you mean by saying pacquiao "is running the show now"? when did the mythical p4p list become a world title? i think pacquiao and his fans are taking this p4p ranking a little too literal and serious! when hopkins was p4p 1, or when others were number one p4p, you didn't hear them say they're running the show now. and so what if he's no.1 of the "p4p world title", fans could give a fuck about that. they just want to see good fights not some prima donna bragging that "he's in control now", bullshit.
    PSL wasn't or anyone in this thread was talking about p4p titles or being p4p no. 1. And it's true Pacquiao is running the show now. As in negotiations for fights and conditions will be in his favor and on his terms. That's pretty much "running the show." The other guy that has that kind of power in the boxing game is Mayweather. They are the 2 faces of boxing right at this moment. They have the leverage to dictate terms to other opponents they face.

    That's how it is in the game. De la Hoya ran the show when he was around as did Leonard before him and so did Ray Robinson before him also. Whoever has the leverage will use it. Boxing is a business and that's how business works. The same also applies to politics and war.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2556
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    LOL of course Pacquaio is running the show. He's a bigger draw than JMM and that's all that matters. Bigger draw than Hopkins ever was too fwiw.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for
    Very interesting. Not calling you a liar, but do you have any links to confirm that JMM was lowball in the rematch?
    Me saying it should be fucking good enough. But here you go. Read it all. You'll see a third party with nothing to do with this confirm it.

    Why Marquez-Pacquiao 2 didn't happen

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for
    Very interesting. Not calling you a liar, but do you have any links to confirm that JMM was lowball in the rematch?
    Me saying it should be fucking good enough. But here you go. Read it all. You'll see a third party with nothing to do with this confirm it.

    Why Marquez-Pacquiao 2 didn't happen
    Thanks for the link. Sure shed some light on the situation.
    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    LOL of course Pacquaio is running the show. He's a bigger draw than JMM and that's all that matters. Bigger draw than Hopkins ever was too fwiw.
    Yeah I thought it was funny that milmascaras would argue Pac running the show. That's how it is with the bigger draw and the guy with leverage.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for
    Very interesting. Not calling you a liar, but do you have any links to confirm that JMM was lowball in the rematch?
    Me saying it should be fucking good enough. But here you go. Read it all. You'll see a third party with nothing to do with this confirm it.

    Why Marquez-Pacquiao 2 didn't happen
    That don't explain away Beristain's idiotic managment. Even Gary Shaw is subtely calling him an idiot there.

    Shaw agrees with Arum that going to Indonesia was something akin to managerial malpractice.

    "I was mortified that they would go over there," he says. "First of all, with no representation, and I was mortified that they would go over there for $30,000. I wouldn't have chased the belt or given up the belt, whatever the case may be."
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1028
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for
    Who are you talking about? "They" Marquez was under Top Rank at the time. Nacho was Marquez's adviser. Murad Muhammad was Pacquiao promoter/manager. Pacquiao had a number of advisors and among them was Roach. The "purse" was 1.8 Million split between the parties. i.e. $900K each. Pacquiao ended up with a little over $300K from the purse. If Marquez only ended up with $100K, it went to his people. After that fight Marquez left Top Rank. After the Chris John fight Marquez was with GBP. Perhaps you have read what Pacquiao made from the first fight where people included his Philippine television rights and the like. I read a number of inaccurate figures quoteing Pacquiao earned $750k not the $650K you state. The reason I know this is because I followed some articles when Pacquiao was suing Murad Muhammad for screwing him out of his purse money. Murad Muhammad posted a lot and HBO also posted the purse split which was a first. (sorry don't have the link) I never believed what Murad Muhammad was saying because after that, they split up even though Murad Muhammad had an exclusive contract with Pacquiao.

    I watched that fight with Chris John and there was no robbery. Marquez relies on counter punching for his offense. Chris John is an outside boxer and did exactly that beating Marquez in a points fight. It was a horribly boring fight. Marquez didn't do squat to earn a victory. He lost just as he lost to Mayweather.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Bunch of fucking idiots with incomplete facts. Here's the actual facts. Marquez made $650,000 for the first Pacquiao fight. He was promised $1.2 million for the rematch. Which he accepted. Than they try to come at him with $750,000. While Pacquiao was to make close to 2 million. The first fight was on HBO Championship boxing. The second was to be PPV. Yet they only giving him $100,000 more than the first fight? A fight in which he didn't lose. Not to mentioned he was the one holding 2 belts. Fuck that. Marquez was not going to let them get over on him like that. I would of walked in his position too. People calling Marquez greedy are straight morons. Asking for what was promised to you ain't being greedy.

    Marquez defended twice more after the rematch didn't happen. He was than stripped by the idiot IBF for not facing his mandatory. Which was the crap fighter known as Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym. Since he was no longer IBF champion. The dumb ass WBA took away his Super Champion status. Leaving Marquez belt less. It was than that he accepted the $30,000 to go to Indonesia and face the regular WBA champion Chris John. Getting robbed was not exactly something he or any fighter can plan for
    Who are you talking about? "They" Marquez was under Top Rank at the time. Nacho was Marquez's adviser. Murad Muhammad was Pacquiao promoter/manager. Pacquiao had a number of advisors and among them was Roach. The "purse" was 1.8 Million split between the parties. i.e. $900K each. Pacquiao ended up with a little over $300K from the purse. If Marquez only ended up with $100K, it went to his people. After that fight Marquez left Top Rank. After the Chris John fight Marquez was with GBP. Perhaps you have read what Pacquiao made from the first fight where people included his Philippine television rights and the like. I read a number of inaccurate figures quoteing Pacquiao earned $750k not the $650K you state. The reason I know this is because I followed some articles when Pacquiao was suing Murad Muhammad for screwing him out of his purse money. Murad Muhammad posted a lot and HBO also posted the purse split which was a first. (sorry don't have the link) I never believed what Murad Muhammad was saying because after that, they split up even though Murad Muhammad had an exclusive contract with Pacquiao.

    I watched that fight with Chris John and there was no robbery. Marquez relies on counter punching for his offense. Chris John is an outside boxer and did exactly that beating Marquez in a points fight. It was a horribly boring fight. Marquez didn't do squat to earn a victory. He lost just as he lost to Mayweather.
    What the hell are you talking about is more like it? I ain't talking about there purses in the first fight. I'm talking about why the 2nd fight didn't happen right away. Marquez was promised over a million dollars. They try to short him almost half a million. For a fight that was gonna be on PPV. And he was the champion.

    And the John fight was a robbery. If you think those point deductions were legit than you need to go buy some muthafukkin glasses.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    828
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    VD no doubt that Beristein is not a good Manager then a Trainer, they could beat Pacquiao for the second time, and it could stop the Pac express if they were really confident to beat this guy they should accept the P750K rather going to Chris Johns turf and losing.

    remember prior to Pac-Marquez I, Marquez cant even get a $650K purse without Pacquiao even with his 2 championpionship belts, he defeated Medina and Gainer still on that time Marquez is virtually unknown than Barrera and Morales, Team Marques should take the 750k.
    Last edited by UKPH; 11-29-2010 at 11:06 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    i think the weight will be the main stumbling block in why this fight doesn't happen. Pac will insist 147, Marquez will want 140 or lower.

    I personallty think the fight should be at 140.

    I would expact pac to win even though I am a marquez fan. Jaun has been in a lot of wars and is getting older.

    I think the fight could happen but to make it happen I think Jaun will have to agree to pacquiao's terms which will make the fight unfair in Pac's favour. But why would that surprise anyone?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Robert Guerrero to fight Chris John
    By markb018 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-13-2009, 12:01 AM
  2. Rafa vs Chris John!
    By Julius Rain in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 08:13 AM
  3. Seen Chris John vs. Rocky Juarez Fight?
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-03-2009, 11:51 PM
  4. Chris John
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-27-2007, 08:37 PM
  5. chris john
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-08-2006, 02:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing