So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

[generalbulldog]

i'll agree. the only fight marquez has lost definitively is against mayweather jr.. that chris john fight was an absolute joke. john ran all night like the coward he is. he's way overrated and once he fights another featherweight champion, he'll be exposed like the fake that he is.

Yeah we all know that a boxer in the ring is a coward unlike keyboard warriors like you that are oh so brave and courageous.

[milmascaras1]

general,

who the fucks talking to you asshole? if you can't fathom that chris john ran when he faced marquez you need to get john's cock out of your mouth.

[generalbulldog]

general,

who the fucks talking to you asshole? if you can't fathom that chris john ran when he faced marquez you need to get john's cock out of your mouth.

I ain't even a John fan. But who the fuck are you to call a man that fights for a living a coward? Shit is funny coming from some armchair internet warrior. A few more idiot members like this and this place becomes another East side boxing forum.

[:::PSL:::]

i'll agree. the only fight marquez has lost definitively is against mayweather jr.. that chris john fight was an absolute joke. john ran all night like the coward he is. he's way overrated and once he fights another featherweight champion, he'll be exposed like the fake that he is.

Attn Mods. I think this thread needs to be cleaned up. Give some deciplinary actions too to the one who deserves it.

Anyway. Back to the topic. Ahem!

CJ simply used the big ring as his advantage. I reckon of the commentator (not the Indonesian) said something like "they made ring bigger than standard to accommodate CJ's running game" which unfortunately unsuitable to JMM's counter punching style.

I've watched the fight again. It seems to me the fight was judged on an amateur-like basis . If you were just see the fight it would look like Marquez won because he hit John with more harder punches, but as the amateur rules proceed, John have landed more punches (mostly jabs on Marquez) so i would conclude John outsmarted Marquez in that fight.

I think CJ really deserves the win. They both landed some clean punches, and you can not really tell who has the edge up to the last round. The thing is, If you are the challenger, you only have 2 choices to win, either fully dominate the fight convincingly or knock your opponent cold which in both cases, Marquez was not able to do.

[mnmc10]

"And I know this for a fact. It came straight from the muthafukka who lives 2 houses down. He comes straight from Zamboanga City. Born and rasied over there. 100% full blooded Flip."

your neighbor probably just migrated to the US and is clueless about it. heck there are some guys whom you can call whatever you want but still smile at you just so they can stay out of trouble or "fit in". zamboanga is also a province in the philippines very far from metro manila. the chances of him meeting fellow zamboanguenos who experienced living in the US is far less as compared to people who lives in metro manila. so he might not be educated about slurs in the US.
its been explained to you alot of times already InTheNeutralCorner also posted a link proving its a slur. and if you use that word again then your probably racist. and is intentionally hating on filipinos.

[milmascaras1]

Attn Mods. I think this thread needs to be cleaned up. Give some deciplinary actions too to the one who deserves it.

Anyway. Back to the topic. Ahem!

CJ simply used the big ring as his advantage. I reckon of the commentator (not the Indonesian) said something like "they made ring bigger than standard to accommodate CJ's running game" which unfortunately unsuitable to JMM's counter punching style.

I've watched the fight again. It seems to me the fight was judged on an amateur-like basis . If you were just see the fight it would look like Marquez won because he hit John with more harder punches, but as the amateur rules proceed, John have landed more punches (mostly jabs on Marquez) so i would conclude John outsmarted Marquez in that fight.

I think CJ really deserves the win. They both landed some clean punches, and you can not really tell who has the edge up to the last round. The thing is, If you are the challenger, you only have 2 choices to win, either fully dominate the fight convincingly or knock your opponent cold which in both cases, Marquez was not able to do.[/QUOTE]

PSL,

there you go running to the mods whenever someone disagrees with you. you remind me of a little toy poodle that barks up a storm but when he's about to get his ass eaten up by a bigger dog, you run to your master with your tail deep inside your legs hoping he'll save you. this is a boxing forum, not everyone is supposed to exchange pleasantries. there are alot of opinions and some are just different than others.

i guess the second quote in bold doesn't apply to pacquiao when he was awarded a SD decision for getting outboxed 8 rounds to 4, doesn't it? like i said before, asia is one of the most corrupt places on earth to ever win world titles. you've got to kill your opponent just to get a split decision.

[:::PSL:::]

Attn Mods. I think this thread needs to be cleaned up. Give some deciplinary actions too to the one who deserves it.

Anyway. Back to the topic. Ahem!

CJ simply used the big ring as his advantage. I reckon of the commentator (not the Indonesian) said something like "they made ring bigger than standard to accommodate CJ's running game" which unfortunately unsuitable to JMM's counter punching style.

I've watched the fight again. It seems to me the fight was judged on an amateur-like basis . If you were just see the fight it would look like Marquez won because he hit John with more harder punches, but as the amateur rules proceed, John have landed more punches (mostly jabs on Marquez) so i would conclude John outsmarted Marquez in that fight.

I think CJ really deserves the win. They both landed some clean punches, and you can not really tell who has the edge up to the last round. The thing is, If you are the challenger, you only have 2 choices to win, either fully dominate the fight convincingly or knock your opponent cold which in both cases, Marquez was not able to do.
PSL,

there you go running to the mods whenever someone disagrees with you. you remind me of a little toy poodle that barks up a storm but when he's about to get his ass eaten up by a bigger dog, you run to your master with your tail deep inside your legs hoping he'll save you. this is a boxing forum, not everyone is supposed to exchange pleasantries. there are alot of opinions and some are just different than others.

i guess the second quote in bold doesn't apply to pacquiao when he was awarded a SD decision for getting outboxed 8 rounds to 4, doesn't it? like i said before, asia is one of the most corrupt places on earth to ever win world titles. you've got to kill your opponent just to get a split decision.

I was talking about the racial talk that has been going on in this thread you dumbfuck. You're so dumb you still don't know how to use the "qoutation" tool of this forum.

[Youngblood]

One thing I like about this site, that made me choose it over others years ago, is that it frowns fairly hard on the derogatory nature of racial slurring. Hence why this thread is in here, and not the main boards. Others sites will get more traffic and replies, but then again so does youtube where just about any vid ends up in a shit storm of racial bs arguing from fools behind their keyboards.

I wonder if Cracker Jibbs got it moved?