Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    bilbao,

    no, the idiot is you. and first off, do you really think pacquiao was better than a prime de la hoya? man, that kool-aid must really taste good, huh?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3390
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    bilbao,

    no, the idiot is you. and first off, do you really think pacquiao was better than a prime de la hoya? man, that kool-aid must really taste good, huh?
    You don't think Manny is better than a prime Oscar?

    Manny is one of the best boxers of all time, already probably top 10, if he beat Floyd he would be top 5.

    Yes he is better than a prime Oscar. Oscar lost every significant he ever fought, Trinidad, Mosley, Hopkins, Mayweather.

    Manny beat everybody, how do they even compare?

    Look at his resume

    Morales
    Barrera
    Marquez
    Hatton
    De La Hoya
    Cotto

    All of them may yet make the Hall of Fame.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    bilbao,

    damn, i want some of that kool-aid too. must really be fulfilling!!! but anyways:

    - you think a prime pacquiao beats a prime de la hoya? sure oscar lost some big fights but you've got to also look at his competition. ALL OF THEM WERE PRIME FIGHTERS! who has pacquiao beaten that is in their prime? you'll got to go back many, many years like the first barrera fight for that!

    - morales was already a spent fighter when he fought pacquiao the first time. hell, he was coming off a hard loss to barrera. he was already having troubles making weight. lookie here, a 70% morales gave pacquiao a nice little boxing lesson and sent him home crying!

    - barrera - no arguments there. i still believe barrera was in his prime when pacquiao tore him apart. barrera was a finesse boxer after the junior jones fights. he had no answer to pacquiao's unorthodox style.

    - marquez - yeah, did you know that knockdowns aren't the only things that win you fights? it's about winning the most rounds or knocking out your opponent. something in which pacquiao was unable to do. look, there is a major reason why pacquiao declined a third fight with marquez. hmmm, i wonder why? maybe because marquez made him see the devil and pacquiao didn't want any more of that? besides, the boxing world wanted to see that fight and marquez even traveled to the philippines to confront pacquiao in front of his fans and a humiliated pacquiao could only utter something like, uh, um, i, wazzzzz, uh, aa, only, aa uh, lucky. what a ducker pacquiao was!

    - lol...do you really think hatton was that good to begin with? sure, he was undefeated at jr. welter but who did he fight in that division? he sure as hell didn't fight anybody good. and besides, mayweather took his zero and frankly, hatton was never the same again. but i will admit though, that was a sickening knockout at the hands of pacquiao!!!

    - regarding miguel angel cotto - the signs were there that he was on the downside. margarito (loaded gloves or not) ruined him. not to mention the catchweight in which pacquiao demanded for this fight. another hollow victory if you ask me.

    listen, i'm not a pac hater. i just don't think he's the greatest thing since hotdogs, apple pie and chevrolet!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    bilbao,

    no, the idiot is you. and first off, do you really think pacquiao was better than a prime de la hoya? man, that kool-aid must really taste good, huh?
    You don't think Manny is better than a prime Oscar?

    Manny is one of the best boxers of all time, already probably top 10, if he beat Floyd he would be top 5.

    Yes he is better than a prime Oscar. Oscar lost every significant he ever fought, Trinidad, Mosley, Hopkins, Mayweather.

    Manny beat everybody, how do they even compare?

    Look at his resume

    Morales
    Barrera
    Marquez
    Hatton
    De La Hoya
    Cotto

    All of them may yet make the Hall of Fame.
    You know better than that. A blind man would tell you De La Hoya did not lose to Trinidad. And he went 1-1 with Mosley. A fighter being robbed should not be held against him. As for the thread question. Manny hit his prime as a Featherweight. Everything done at 130 and above should be discarded due to his steroid usage. Only a fool would think that Pacquiao gigantic ass head is normal.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,656
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3126
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    If a gigantic head makes him guilty then Oscar is on drugs too.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,604
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1615
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    I think with any fighter thier prime all depends on who you talk to. A fan, media, the fighter himself etc. Basically the way it's used most often is if a fighter is winning he's in his prime, when he looses to someone better everyone says he's past it. It's usually used for people who like certain fighters as well. If a guy wins who you don't like, just say he won cause his opponet was past his prime. This term is used more as an excuse than it is a measure of the condition of a fighter.
    Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    To me the one thing Pac has yet to do is beat a prime undefeated fighter. As oh late seems to pick up peoples left overs and i mean Mayweather gets shit for it but if pac does it seems not as many care. I don't like either but Hatton, Cotto, and Margarito all had career ending ass kicking's. Then all the sudden pac fights them after it, Pac is in the top 25 for sure but i think hes best was in the lower weights.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    One more thing when talking about Pac's spot in history is when he starts to lose and gets older. I mean look at what happen to Holyfeild to me he is one of the greatest but as he keeps on fighting, i am sure other peoples view of were he should be would change.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5040
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    I'm one of the few who still thinks he's reaching his prime at this point.
    Many believe he's already reached it, others say he's peaked.

    I think Pac will be one of those few rare fighters who retires with wins and not a several loses. Possibly even as a champ...

    Like Carbajal, Monzon and Jofre (with wins)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1233
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    I'm one of the few who still thinks he's reaching his prime at this point.
    Many believe he's already reached it, others say he's peaked.

    I think Pac will be one of those few rare fighters who retires with wins and not a several loses. Possibly even as a champ...

    Like Carbajal, Monzon and Jofre (with wins)

    I think now is Pac's PHYSICAL prime its only a matter of maintaining it. it could be all downhill from the Marg fight.

    TECHNICALLY I think he's at 90%. Margarito should have not cause some damage.
    He should learn to avoid unnecessary damages.
    Last edited by miron_lang; 12-03-2010 at 09:24 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2187
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    I'm one of the few who still thinks he's reaching his prime at this point.
    Many believe he's already reached it, others say he's peaked.

    I think Pac will be one of those few rare fighters who retires with wins and not a several loses. Possibly even as a champ...

    Like Carbajal, Monzon and Jofre (with wins)

    I think now is Pac's PHYSICAL prime its only a matter of maintaining it. it could be all downhill from the Marg fight.

    TECHNICALLY I think he's at 90%. Margarito should have not cause some damage.
    He should learn to avoid unnecessary damages.
    I think it's the opposite.. technicality wise, he fights smarter than he ever has.... I just don't think physically he is what he was 4 to 5 years ago, and that made him take more from Margarito than he could have..

    He has carried the weight up incredibly well though, so he can physically overpower BIG welterweights like Margarito and Cotto...


    I think if "prime" encompasses everything like intelligence, physical attribute, mental will, skill etc.... Then right now as Mick said, he is absolutely prime and could look better in every fight he's in...
    Last edited by Dizaster; 12-03-2010 at 10:05 AM.
    ~ He thinks he's a Tornado,,,... F'ckn real Tornado is comin'...! ~Hidden Content

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1233
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dizaster View Post
    I think it's the opposite.. technicality wise, he fights smarter than he ever has.... I just don't think physically he is what he was 4 to 5 years ago, and that made him take more from Margarito than he could have..

    He has carried the weight up incredibly well though, so he can physically overpower BIG welterweights like Margarito and Cotto...


    I think if "prime" encompasses everything like intelligence, physical attribute, mental will, skill etc.... Then right now as Mick said, he is absolutely prime and could look better in every fight he's in...
    That's another nice way of looking at it.

    But i think PHYSICALLY the strength, stamina, speed, power etc are already at their PEAK. No way he could be faster, stronger, etc from this point.

    Saying he is TECHNICALLY at his peak means there are no more additional skills he can acquire which i think is not the case because IMO Pac can still add up to his arsenal.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2146
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    thanks to the guys who got this thread back on track. These fxckin nuisance keep talking shit about one fighter that they hate so much but can't prevent themselves from not clicking on the tread. Damn Losers.

    Anyways - I think pac has definitely improve above lightweight. He is smarter - for example: When cotto would go into a southpaw stance, first thing pac does it he throws a right hook that lands right on target. You can see that he is reading what is in front of him and will adjust and sometimes would change up his attack. Physically and technically I think pac has improve above lightweight. I do think he is at his prime right now in the welterweight division.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1198
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    above lightweight, better use of the right hand and better footwork.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    792
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1063
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Did Pac reach his prime above or below lightweight?

    he's had two primes....1 as a toe 2 toe brawler and now as a great move and hit boxer

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-18-2007, 03:46 PM
  2. Pernell Whitaker vs mosley PRIME Lightweight
    By artest2000 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-22-2007, 06:56 AM
  3. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-18-2007, 04:14 AM
  4. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-02-2007, 04:07 AM
  5. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-17-2006, 01:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing