rain,

let me ask you a serious question. why is it that when pacquiao KO'd morales in their rematch, he agreed to give him a third fight? i mean, most everyone knew the same thing would happen in their third fight, right? but with marquez, because of the two times marquez made him see the devil, all of the sudden, two fights is enough with marquez? the reason why he took the morales trilogy was because he knew morales was seriously on the downside, having major problems making weight and his punch resistance wasn't as good anymore.

you know, throughout history, whenever a fighter like pacquiao wins a world title controversially the way he did with marquez at super featherweight, most true champions would grant the ex-champion a rematch. marquez gave pacquiao the opportunity to fight for his title so why wouldn't pacquiao do the same for marquez?

i think this is total bullshit and most real boxing fans would agree with me. on this website however, justification as to why pacquiao shouldn't fight marquez a third time are rampant.

pacquiao's excuses are already growing old. but instead he tries to justify a match with a totally washed up mosley? boxing fans all over the world are beginning to see just what kind of a fraud pacquiao and his team are. taking fights with bigger, washed up guys is supposed to propel pacquiao
to GOAT status? this is one fan who refuses to drink the Kool-Aid even though it's plain clear that Kool-Aid has been spiked with pactardism.