Quote Originally Posted by Snakey View Post
Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
Well I think with all the titles out there and its harder and harder to unify....I just think it takes longer for the bigger fights to happen.
Yeah but that has nothing to do with any of the number inputs does it? I mean do you think there are young guys who belong in the p4p top ten who can't get the right fights?
Well protecting the 0 has become THE issue in boxing....nobody (with the exception of guys that have already lost) is willing to take a risk these days.
TRUTH!

Makes for really mediocre fighters. I couldn't care less about unbeaten fighters. I care about great ones.
But dont you think we have kind of created this mindset. We are so critical these days when a fighter loses to someone that its gotta have an effect on the mindset of the fighter.
Do I think undereducated (defined as those who disagree with me in this matter)fans are at the core of boxing's issues? I do. Every time someone calls a strapholder a champion, a guy who loses "damaged goods" or argues an unbeaten record equals greatness an unscrupulous promoter calls up a sanctioning body head and crows "I told you these guys were that stupid! Now I gotta find an out of work 135 pound pipefitter to take on my latest 15-0 Cuban defector!"

I do think the tournaments at 168 and at 118 have stemmed the tide a little in that perhaps people now realize occasional losses to other top guys aren't all that meaningful.