Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Douglas manhandles Tyson

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1952
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    fast hands,fast feet. He would give many a plodding heavyweights a nightmare.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1064
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Tyson lost against Douglas because he thought it would be a walk in the park and didn't train in consequence at all. Result: a very bad awakening and then a deflated invincibility halo.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post
    Tyson lost against Douglas because he thought it would be a walk in the park and didn't train in consequence at all. Result: a very bad awakening and then a deflated invincibility halo.
    Right, Tyson badly underestimated Douglas, and his determination to win.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    fast hands,fast feet. He would give many a plodding heavyweights a nightmare.
    Yup, and one punch KO power, people can say what they want about Tyson's annihilation of Larry Holmes for example, Holmes was old, didn't get a chance to train et al, but nobody EVER manhandled Holmes the way Tyson did in that fight.

    It's easy now to say that Tyson was an over hyped, piece of shit, but I used to hang out, drink beer & talk boxing with some old Pros back when Tyson was at his best, and more then a few of them said at that time, Tyson was the best HW ever.

    Douglas fights Tyson a year or so earlier, and I bet Douglas wouldn't have lasted 3 rounds, and i'd also bet Douglas would have gotten his ass torn up in a rematch.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 06-08-2011 at 01:54 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    786
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    fast hands,fast feet. He would give many a plodding heavyweights a nightmare.
    Yup, and one punch KO power, people can say what they want about Tyson's annihilation of Larry Holmes for example, Holmes was old, didn't get a chance to train et al, but nobody EVER manhandled Holmes the way Tyson did in that fight.

    It's easy now to say that Tyson was an over hyped, piece of shit, but I used to hang out, drink beer & talk boxing with some old Pros back when Tyson was at his best, and more then a few of them said at that time, Tyson was the best HW ever.

    Douglas fights Tyson a year or so earlier, and I bet Douglas wouldn't have lasted 3 rounds, and i'd also bet Douglas would have gotten his ass torn up in a rematch.
    To be fair nobody ever fought a 39 year old Holmes who had been retired for 18 months, trained for a month and said before the fight "I'll know how to stay on my stool and take the check."

    For three rounds Tyson has a chance against anyone who ever laced'em up.

    I just never got Tyson or the idea in the 1980's that he was the best ever. Maybe it was me, but I couldn't figure out at the time how someone could say those things about a guy who had never been tested and had to deal with adversity.

    Now to be fair to the Tyson, he took one hell of a beating before he succumbed against Buster. He tactically didn't deal with the adversity very well (and his cornermen should have been shot) , but he showed plenty of heart and desire I thought. In some ways I thought more of him after the fight than I had before.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,956
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5111
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    I love watching this fight. Not just for the upset factor but the era. It was really a huge transition point for the heavyweight division and a story of two top notch fighters who really lost the ball when seemingly at absolute tip top. Douglas had previous mental lapses Tyson was not worn by ring wars and age so much as his own aura and massive success. Mentally...he got fat. Way too much is made of him not being at best, having issues etc etc but who doesn't. You sink or swim and really find out what your make up is when faced with the biggest adversity.

    Ive seen it said that Mike was the most dominant destructive force in decades and you can't deny his ferocity and edge of the seat appeal. The man was a dynamo! But largely he swept clean a cluttered field of hangers on and belt holders that warmed the trinket more then merited the Championship. Besting a Tubbs, Tucker, Biggs etc etc does not equate to same dominance in division just years later had it been a peak Bowe, Holyfield, Mercer or even a slower though much wiser Foreman etc. He did all that can be asked in terms of going through what was available and giving division something it desperately lacks since and thats uniformity and a undeniable figure head. But ultimately he waned and got caught slipping and thats all it takes. He was the best he was able to be that night. Thats on him, entirely. And Douglas put on a show for the ages, just a display of long fluid punching and mindset that makes you glad to be a fan...and wishing he had kept his head right for a while. I think Tyson benefits from a bit of rose colored glasses and a yearning to have that undeniability and clarity back in what so many hold to be the division which drives the sport. He gave alot away of him self and could never really regain footing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    957
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Tyson ripped through the 80s no doubt. But I always found it ridiculous that just because he beat up guys like Berbick, Biggs, Thomas, that automatically means he beats Ali, 70s Foreman, prime Holmes, Liston, and any other HW in the past you can name.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    786
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    I love watching this fight. Not just for the upset factor but the era. It was really a huge transition point for the heavyweight division and a story of two top notch fighters who really lost the ball when seemingly at absolute tip top. Douglas had previous mental lapses Tyson was not worn by ring wars and age so much as his own aura and massive success. Mentally...he got fat. Way too much is made of him not being at best, having issues etc etc but who doesn't. You sink or swim and really find out what your make up is when faced with the biggest adversity.

    Ive seen it said that Mike was the most dominant destructive force in decades and you can't deny his ferocity and edge of the seat appeal. The man was a dynamo! But largely he swept clean a cluttered field of hangers on and belt holders that warmed the trinket more then merited the Championship. Besting a Tubbs, Tucker, Biggs etc etc does not equate to same dominance in division just years later had it been a peak Bowe, Holyfield, Mercer or even a slower though much wiser Foreman etc. He did all that can be asked in terms of going through what was available and giving division something it desperately lacks since and thats uniformity and a undeniable figure head. But ultimately he waned and got caught slipping and thats all it takes. He was the best he was able to be that night. Thats on him, entirely. And Douglas put on a show for the ages, just a display of long fluid punching and mindset that makes you glad to be a fan...and wishing he had kept his head right for a while. I think Tyson benefits from a bit of rose colored glasses and a yearning to have that undeniability and clarity back in what so many hold to be the division which drives the sport. He gave alot away of him self and could never really regain footing.
    I wish I'd written that!
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,956
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5111
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    I love watching this fight. Not just for the upset factor but the era. It was really a huge transition point for the heavyweight division and a story of two top notch fighters who really lost the ball when seemingly at absolute tip top. Douglas had previous mental lapses Tyson was not worn by ring wars and age so much as his own aura and massive success. Mentally...he got fat. Way too much is made of him not being at best, having issues etc etc but who doesn't. You sink or swim and really find out what your make up is when faced with the biggest adversity.

    Ive seen it said that Mike was the most dominant destructive force in decades and you can't deny his ferocity and edge of the seat appeal. The man was a dynamo! But largely he swept clean a cluttered field of hangers on and belt holders that warmed the trinket more then merited the Championship. Besting a Tubbs, Tucker, Biggs etc etc does not equate to same dominance in division just years later had it been a peak Bowe, Holyfield, Mercer or even a slower though much wiser Foreman etc. He did all that can be asked in terms of going through what was available and giving division something it desperately lacks since and thats uniformity and a undeniable figure head. But ultimately he waned and got caught slipping and thats all it takes. He was the best he was able to be that night. Thats on him, entirely. And Douglas put on a show for the ages, just a display of long fluid punching and mindset that makes you glad to be a fan...and wishing he had kept his head right for a while. I think Tyson benefits from a bit of rose colored glasses and a yearning to have that undeniability and clarity back in what so many hold to be the division which drives the sport. He gave alot away of him self and could never really regain footing.
    I wish I'd written that!
    Just glad It didnt make the eyes cross over midway Rewatched again, a friggin hot water bottle! Sums the people he surrounded himself with well eh.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Douglas manhandles Tyson

    saw the fight again today and never ceases to amaze. man Tyson took some monster shots like a real man, a he-man, and sucked it up, licked it up like a little whore.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Anybody got the Tyson Douglas fight?
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2010, 09:11 PM
  2. What if Tyson and Douglas had a rematch?
    By Majesty in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 03-01-2010, 03:24 PM
  3. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 12-15-2007, 04:42 AM
  4. Tyson-Douglas
    By USA LOVES THE KLITSCHKOS in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 02:56 AM
  5. tyson vs douglas article
    By TICH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 05:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing