Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

[BIG H]

calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

This !!

Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is

he beat hopkins convincingly (ok some crazy judge gave it to hopkins)

it was a clear win for calazaghi, why should he give him a rematch?

is wlad avoiding a rematch with haye like the plague?

based on what ? that calzaghe threw more wild shots? hit the air more often than hopkins ?

and im pretty sure calzaghes win over veit was clear but he went back for more there didnt he

and Wlad is all over a rematch with haye because he sees the £££

Or the fact that Hopkins didn't wina round after round 4 and had no answer to Calzaghe's workrate.