Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sure **** he did! He had Holmes on the verge of knockout in the 9th and outshone him in the majority of the rounds. Isn't it proof enough that one judge scored it for Witherspoon, the underdog?
Can remember Larry being interviewed after the fight, and it was pointed out, that most people thought he'd lost.. He wasn't at all dismissive, & just responded by saying, it was up to the judges.. I got the distinct impression, that Holmes felt he'd been very lucky.. Meanwhile Witherspoon was ranting furiously, and claiming victory in the face of a robbery..
He definitely deserved a rematch as did Carl Williams, in my opinion.
I never see the interview but i saw it as a very close fight, with the commentator's being very biased towards Tim Witherspoon. I remember Tim Witherspoon being very good defensively with his Ken Norton like defence parrying Larry Holmes's jab.
But often he didn't punch enough and Larry Holmes edged rounds being more busy, yes he had Larry Holmes hurt in the 9th round. But you also forget to mention Larry Holmes had Tim Witherspoon stunned badly and finished the round very strong. In no way was it a robbery though either man could of won it, was a very close fight.
As for Carl Williams i remember Carl Williams being ahead after 11 rounds, but then i remember he faded and lost the last 3 or 4 rounds in a row. Which probably gave Larry Holmes the edge, but again a very close fight could of gone either way no robbery.
I remember someone on this forum telling me once, Chris Byrd was the Jimmy Young of his era i think thats a very good comparison.
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks