
Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
AdamGB
He would have been in his twenties and have had fights still numbering in the teens...
So yeah Joe wanting to fight him then and Froch turning it down don't surprise me.
Different story now, judged as a Champion - who hasn't Froch fought? Who has he turned down? Nobody. The same cannot be said of Calzaghe.
The biggest win I can give him is Kes.
Hahahaha!
Froch was 30 and had 21 fights!

reid was his 22nd! By contrast, when Calzaghe was scheduled to challenge Collins he hadnt been a pro 4 years yet and had 22 fights. Froch was so slow about moving his career but when offered the chance of a boost he went quiet.
This was in 2007 before Calzaghe fought Kessler.
Dont forget it it was Froch who was calling Calzaghe out everywhere but when offered the fight he shit his pants and sat back down.
If We are judging Calzaghe purely on the Kessler fight then he is better than Froch...
It's all I can judge him on:
Lacy - we've seen how good he was, great beat down... But against a very over hyped fighter
Jones - old, Calzaghe himself WROTE thar Jones Jr. was old and shot, then fought him a year or two later anyway.
Hopkins - old and a very disputed win (not the first either, ask robin reid), some say he lost. Hardly conclusive.
Eubank - old, Calzaghe did take it on short notice, but he can't get the same credit he would have for beating a young Eubank.
Yeah he was undefeated, but he could of had two losses and so was sven otke
Listen, I like Calzaghe (I can see the dvd of the kessler bout on my shelf now), but people tend to over rate him somewhat, doesn 't mean he wasn't a good champ though.
As for Froch's age/record, you said BEFORE the Robin Reid fight, not after!
But what do you want? His career got off to a slower start than Calzaghes? It just goes down as a fight offered to somebody inexperienced and untested at that level. Differet story now.
Bookmarks