Another Slight Against Christ

[BoxingGorilla]

How anyone can say that the Christian faith isn't being singled out is mind-boggling.

FOXNews.com - 'Why Believe in a God?' Ad Campaign Launches on D.C. Buses - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

[Wayne]

I don't have time to read, but I will and respond.

[CFH]

Oh my God! How a private group spend their own money to encourage people to be moral individuals without using the fear of the wrath of what might well be a mythological being to compel them!

AAAAAAaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!

It's really easy to explain BG, it's called Freedom of Speech. If you don't like it, well tough shit. I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but people are allowed to say what they will, it's not hurting anybody, and it's not like someone is going to read that and go, "you know what? I'm not going to believe in God anymore."

Would you prefer to live in a place where people are not allowed to say such things?

[Trainer Monkey]

No, the almost 30 year old song, Jesus Entering Through The Rear, was a slight against Christ
Thats a billboard encouraging free thought

[Kev]

Oh my God! How a private group spend their own money to encourage people to be moral individuals without using the fear of the wrath of what might well be a mythological being to compel them!

AAAAAAaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!

It's really easy to explain BG, it's called Freedom of Speech. If you don't like it, well tough shit. I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but people are allowed to say what they will, it's not hurting anybody, and it's not like someone is going to read that and go, "you know what? I'm not going to believe in God anymore."

Would you prefer to live in a place where people are not allowed to say such things?

Whilst I agree that freedom of speech means they can say what they want you have to admit it's blatently antagonistic.

That's to say nothing of the sheer hypocrisy on display here These humanists literally run to the law courts every time there's a suggestion that evolution actually be critiqued in the classroom and, heaven forbid that kids might be indoctrinated with the idea that the universe might be intelligently designed. 'Keep it out of the classroom!' they cry, 'religion has no place mixing with science, bla bla bla'.

Yet they themselves have no qualms at all about trying to sabatage Christianity's greatest annual celebration with their positive message of meaningless and nothing

Plus it sounds all very nice to say you can have 'goodness for goodness sake' but what does that actually mean?

Without an absolute frame of reference you cannot have a system of morality as what constitutes 'good' is entirely the subjective opinions of each individual.

As it says in the book of Judges where it describes Isreal's decline into moral decadence and spiritual emptiness 'Without a ruler to judge them, everybody did what was right in his own eyes'.

That basis for morality always leads to complete shitness and the eventual collapse of every civilisation that has gone before us.

The Western world is now just going the way of Ancient Rome, it won't last much longer.

[Youngblood]

I have religion class next term. Looking forward to it actually as they are making me attend as they don't feel I will benefit from doing my usual laptop school work.

Yes, looking forward to it indeed. I anticipate much sleeping.

[Andre]

I have religion class next term. Looking forward to it actually as they are making me attend as they don't feel I will benefit from doing my usual laptop school work.

Yes, looking forward to it indeed. I anticipate much sleeping.

What fun a Catholic school!

Why dont you make it interesting and ask them a few questions.

Hey just for fun : ask them this: In Genesis page 1 it states that God said let there be light and there was light and it was the first day.
later on in the same chapter it says (a couple of days later) like on the 3rd day etc And God made the large light for the day and the lesser light for the night.

Ask them what the original light source was on the first day,if they make an excuse up about getting the verses slightly the wrong way around etc;they dont know and are are just parrot teachers going word for word ;leave them and go to sleep. If they explain to you what that original light actually was ,please let us know their answer.
there is one I want to know if they know.

Also:
Strange how that the new "Lord God" showed up to Moses right when he needed a new explaination for his unrepentant followers to stick with him through the desert years!
So the Lord God shows up to Moses with a name change after Billions of years of creation had already been underway with commandments telling them what to do and they will be judged if they dont and vengence will be poured out on their m/asses for all eternity! Bit strange.


After all the same Bible says no one except Jesus has seen the one God even he says as much, later on in the same book; If the word of Jesus is true , who did Moses see up on the mountain?

So does this mean that the "Lord God" the vengeful one now called "Jehova" is a sub level part of the Original God "Elohim" the original creator of all that is.

That should get things interesting.

Oh and if you want an extended break from school ask them why they changed Gods Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday? SAy to them "You represent the Catholic Church dont you"?,so why did the Roman Church do that?

want some more?

[Trainer Monkey]

Oh my God! How a private group spend their own money to encourage people to be moral individuals without using the fear of the wrath of what might well be a mythological being to compel them!

AAAAAAaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!

It's really easy to explain BG, it's called Freedom of Speech. If you don't like it, well tough shit. I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but people are allowed to say what they will, it's not hurting anybody, and it's not like someone is going to read that and go, "you know what? I'm not going to believe in God anymore."

Would you prefer to live in a place where people are not allowed to say such things?

Whilst I agree that freedom of speech means they can say what they want you have to admit it's blatently antagonistic.

That's to say nothing of the sheer hypocrisy on display here These humanists literally run to the law courts every time there's a suggestion that evolution actually be critiqued in the classroom and, heaven forbid that kids might be indoctrinated with the idea that the universe might be intelligently designed. 'Keep it out of the classroom!' they cry, 'religion has no place mixing with science, bla bla bla'.

Yet they themselves have no qualms at all about trying to sabatage Christianity's greatest annual celebration with their positive message of meaningless and nothing

Plus it sounds all very nice to say you can have 'goodness for goodness sake' but what does that actually mean?

Without an absolute frame of reference you cannot have a system of morality as what constitutes 'good' is entirely the subjective opinions of each individual.

As it says in the book of Judges where it describes Isreal's decline into moral decadence and spiritual emptiness 'Without a ruler to judge them, everybody did what was right in his own eyes'.

That basis for morality always leads to complete shitness and the eventual collapse of every civilisation that has gone before us.

The Western world is now just going the way of Ancient Rome, it won't last much longer.

Interestingly theres a frame of refrence available in the Bible, that your not following
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
Your po'ed that people are co-opting a holiday the Christians themselves co-opted
And here you are kvetching about the fact that they would dare do that
Not very Christian

[Kev]

Oh my God! How a private group spend their own money to encourage people to be moral individuals without using the fear of the wrath of what might well be a mythological being to compel them!

AAAAAAaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!

It's really easy to explain BG, it's called Freedom of Speech. If you don't like it, well tough shit. I'm not trying to be mean or anything, but people are allowed to say what they will, it's not hurting anybody, and it's not like someone is going to read that and go, "you know what? I'm not going to believe in God anymore."

Would you prefer to live in a place where people are not allowed to say such things?

Whilst I agree that freedom of speech means they can say what they want you have to admit it's blatently antagonistic.

That's to say nothing of the sheer hypocrisy on display here These humanists literally run to the law courts every time there's a suggestion that evolution actually be critiqued in the classroom and, heaven forbid that kids might be indoctrinated with the idea that the universe might be intelligently designed. 'Keep it out of the classroom!' they cry, 'religion has no place mixing with science, bla bla bla'.

Yet they themselves have no qualms at all about trying to sabatage Christianity's greatest annual celebration with their positive message of meaningless and nothing

Plus it sounds all very nice to say you can have 'goodness for goodness sake' but what does that actually mean?

Without an absolute frame of reference you cannot have a system of morality as what constitutes 'good' is entirely the subjective opinions of each individual.

As it says in the book of Judges where it describes Isreal's decline into moral decadence and spiritual emptiness 'Without a ruler to judge them, everybody did what was right in his own eyes'.

That basis for morality always leads to complete shitness and the eventual collapse of every civilisation that has gone before us.

The Western world is now just going the way of Ancient Rome, it won't last much longer.

Interestingly theres a frame of refrence available in the Bible, that your not following
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
Your po'ed that people are co-opting a holiday the Christians themselves co-opted
And here you are kvetching about the fact that they would dare do that
Not very Christian

Nope, I'm not remotely bothered that they have decided they can gatecrash a Christian festival, as I said it's freedom of speech.

What I said if you bothered to read it properly was that it's blatently hypocritical of these humanists to cry foul and run to the law courts when Christians want to mention intelligent design in the classroom. They appear on the news telling us that Christians should save their message for the Sunday School and Christmas and yet they now want to force Christians to share their Christmas platform with them?

It's just hypocrisy, I personally think it's fine if humanists want to be able to promote an anti Christian Chrismas message, just don't go crying when Christians want to see evolutionary humanism actually critiqued in the classroom rather than accepted unquestionably as sacred dogma.

[pacfan]

Let me repeat what I've said in the 'doomed' thread couple blocks away. When the da Vinci Code came out in the theaters, I thought that the world, especially the Western world, was in for a big trouble. Then, the subprime mortgage crisis came and I thought this must be it, just maybe (the crisis started almost immediately after that). Coincidence? Hmmm, perhaps...

[CFH]

Let me repeat what I've said in the 'doomed' thread couple blocks away. When the da Vinci Code came out in the theaters, I thought that the world, especially the Western world, was in for a big trouble. Then, the subprime mortgage crisis came and I thought this must be it, just maybe (the crisis started almost immediately after that). Coincidence? Hmmm, perhaps...

That God you believe in seems awfully vindictive.

[pacfan]

Let me repeat what I've said in the 'doomed' thread couple blocks away. When the da Vinci Code came out in the theaters, I thought that the world, especially the Western world, was in for a big trouble. Then, the subprime mortgage crisis came and I thought this must be it, just maybe (the crisis started almost immediately after that). Coincidence? Hmmm, perhaps...

That God you believe in seems awfully vindictive.

It's not necessarily from God where it's coming from (and I didn't mean the devil either). Remember, I think differently but I've already made my mystical thoughts known at the other threads, and they are too long and arduous to repeat so I can't go into that here... Keep your mind open, CFH, keep 'em open.

[Fenster]

"Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness' sake,"

How does that upset anyone that believes in a god? You need god to be good?

[CFH]

"Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness' sake,"

How does that upset anyone that believes in a god? You need god to be good?

Of course, as evidenced by the actions of the Christians through out history. They have a lovely record of kindness, acceptance, and understanding, towards all living things.

[Youngblood]

One thing for sure, it is a sin and disrespectful to take the lords name in vain. I mean...try to be a bit more respectful for Christs sake.