Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1210
    Cool Clicks

    Default Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Before he fought Cotto he was number 1 in light Welterweights and in Welterweights it was

    1.Mosley
    2.Mayweather
    3.Cotto

    And now Pac is number 1 is it me or is the world just so far up Pacquiao's ARSE!! granted he is P4P#1 but i think he should have just slipped in to Cotto's number 3 spot.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Maybe not P4P but at Welterweight you can't put him above Mayweather or Mosley...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    I don't even class the Cotto/Pac fight as a proper WW fight. It was at a catchweight and I don't think any belts should have been on the line either.

    Mosley is still number 1 as far as I'm concerned. I have no idea where Mayweather comes in at having last fought a LW and a JWW before that. Maybe Mosley, then Pac and only then Mayweather.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Only right if you ask me

    The 2 fights he has had at the weight have been nothing short of remarkable, cotto beat mosley, pac beat cotto

    Floyd took a close decision to beat ODLH, pac battered him in 8rounds!

    1.Pacquiao
    2.Mayweather
    3.Mosley
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1574
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    cotto beat mosely, and then Pac-May destroyed Cotto. I have no problem ranking him above Mosely.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    188
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1040
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post

    Floyd took a close decision to beat ODLH, pac battered him in 8rounds!
    Come on, if you are going to use an example, pick another one. Even Roach said that prefight he could see needle tracks in De La Hoya's arms and knew it would be an easy night. The guy was weight drained beyond belief for that fight, something he was not for Mayweather.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    It's close.
    1. Mosley: he retains the #1 spot. He lost a razor thin decision to Cotto but then demolished a Margarito who had beat Cotto.
    2. Pacquiao: beat Cotto who was consensus #2
    3. Cotto/Floyd: has beat more top opposition at welterweight/jr. welterweight than any of the top guys: Clottey, Shane, Quintana, Judah, Malinaggi, Bailey etc.
    4. Floyd/Cotto: has not fought one consensus top ten welterweight in five years. Biggest win at welterweight was probably over Baldomir or Marquez who is a lightweight.
    Now, a p4p list would look very different. But, I don't see how you rank Floyd above Pacquiao or Mosley and probably Cotto at welterweight at least if the list is based on achievements in the weight class because Floyd hasn't done anything at welterweight...ever really. I could see him above Cotto because of Cotto's recent losses, but even that's close call.

    Also, unless I'm mistaken, isn't any fight above 140 but below 147 considered a welterweight fight?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Only right if you ask me

    The 2 fights he has had at the weight have been nothing short of remarkable, cotto beat mosley, pac beat cotto

    Floyd took a close decision to beat ODLH, pac battered him in 8rounds!

    1.Pacquiao
    2.Mayweather
    3.Mosley
    Floyd fought ODLH at Light Middle, what does that have to do with the Welterweight rankings?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1210
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Only right if you ask me

    The 2 fights he has had at the weight have been nothing short of remarkable, cotto beat mosley, pac beat cotto

    Floyd took a close decision to beat ODLH, pac battered him in 8rounds!

    1.Pacquiao
    2.Mayweather
    3.Mosley
    Pac beat a weight drained Oscar who wasn't even in the Welterweight top 10 and Floyd beat a big 154lbs WBC champ Oscar who was number 1 at the time in that division. Yes Pac beat Cotto who beat Mosley but Mosley destroyed Margarito who had Destroyed Cotto and Cintron and Pacquiao's fight was at 145lbs not at the 147lbs Welterweight limit.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Tysonbruno View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Only right if you ask me

    The 2 fights he has had at the weight have been nothing short of remarkable, cotto beat mosley, pac beat cotto

    Floyd took a close decision to beat ODLH, pac battered him in 8rounds!

    1.Pacquiao
    2.Mayweather
    3.Mosley
    Pac beat a weight drained Oscar who wasn't even in the Welterweight top 10 and Floyd beat a big 154lbs WBC champ Oscar who was number 1 at the time in that division. Yes Pac beat Cotto who beat Mosley but Mosley destroyed Margarito who had Destroyed Cotto and Cintron and Pacquiao's fight was at 145lbs not at the 147lbs Welterweight limit.

    Oscars prime weight was always welter, the quartey, whittaker and carr fights proved that years ago surely?

    And didnt oscar come in at like 149 when he fought floyd? hardly a massive light middle was he
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1329
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    I don't even class the Cotto/Pac fight as a proper WW fight. It was at a catchweight and I don't think any belts should have been on the line either.

    Mosley is still number 1 as far as I'm concerned. I have no idea where Mayweather comes in at having last fought a LW and a JWW before that. Maybe Mosley, then Pac and only then Mayweather.
    i kind of see what you are saying but WW isn't 147 though, 147 is the limit, the WW division is 140.1 - 147lbs... there are fighters who come in under 140, judah usualy comes in around 145, floyd often has too...

    its the same for every weight class, the number is the Limit for that weight, so it is right really.. (i don't agree on these contracted weights much, but a lot of other fighters have done.

    anyhow how cares, in his next fight Floyd will have shut him and arum up once and for all.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    805
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    910
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Tysonbruno View Post
    Before he fought Cotto he was number 1 in light Welterweights and in Welterweights it was

    1.Mosley
    2.Mayweather
    3.Cotto

    And now Pac is number 1 is it me or is the world just so far up Pacquiao's ARSE!! granted he is P4P#1 but i think he should have just slipped in to Cotto's number 3 spot.

    Agree totally mate, one fight doesn't mean he has cleaned up a division. It's a shame coz it's not him that's causing all the hype, he seems a nice humble bloke from what you can tell, but his shit gets your back up.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1359
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    I think its absolute bullshit because the only guy he fought and beat at Welterweight was Oscar.

    The Cotto fight was an amazing win, but it wasn't at welterweight. If you want to fight at a catch weight, I don't see how that fight should count at any weight class. It did wonders for his p4p rankings, but how can it move him up at WW if the fight was not at WW?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    I think its absolute bullshit because the only guy he fought and beat at Welterweight was Oscar.

    The Cotto fight was an amazing win, but it wasn't at welterweight. If you want to fight at a catch weight, I don't see how that fight should count at any weight class. It did wonders for his p4p rankings, but how can it move him up at WW if the fight was not at WW?
    147 is the WW limit. It means 141-147 is welterweight range. Pac-Cotto fight was a legit WW bout.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao Number 1 in Welterweights in The Ring Magazine

    The Ring magazine has strongly been a Pac groupie so I don't take much offense to their opinion. Pac fought one welterweight in his career. Its not reasonable to have a guy beat one welterweight, not to mention at a catchweight, who was not even number 1 and then give him the number 1 spot. So basically 2 guys, not named Mosley, fight at a catchweight and Mosley's number 1 spot is on the line. LaughableBut I'm not going to get on Pac. His groupie's aren't his responsibility.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. RING Magazine
    By C-Lo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-17-2009, 09:52 PM
  2. The Ring Magazine T-Shirts
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-20-2008, 03:46 PM
  3. New Ring Magazine Rankings
    By C-Lo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-04-2008, 06:23 PM
  4. New Ring Magazine
    By DAVIDTUA in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-23-2008, 09:57 PM
  5. Ring Magazine Top 100
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 11-15-2007, 01:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing