bernard and joe was just a clash of styles it was joes first fight at the weight and in my opinion bernard is th best spoiler in the world but after the third round it all changed. bernard didnt like how quick joe was changing his style and couldnt do what he normally does because joes inside work (grappling) was superb.
i personaly think kelly pavlik is a unschooled wild version of the beast that is mikkel kessler if joe fights kelly pavlik, pavlik want be able to deal with the amount of punches coming at him. pavlik likes to set him self and joe wont let him do it.
If you have ever scene Pavlik fight he doesnt set he pushes. He throws any where from 80- 120 punches a round. He is a way more sound boxer than Kessler. Going by how strait and accurate his punches are. If he was crazy he would loop his punches and throw off balance. He does neither. Joe cannot hurt Pavlik at all. Just like he could not hurt Hopkins with his slaps. Its a joke watching Calzaghes style. The only reason Calzaghe won is because he was busier than Hopkins. Hopkins landed the better shots. To think Pavlik wont be busy and wont land way harder shots than Kessler is undereducated. Joe is a overrated champ. He never fought RJJ , Toney , of Hopkins 10 years ago. Calzaghe just stayed hidden in the confines of Wales. Pavlik by knockout. Joe hits like a bitch.
Pavlik vs. Calzaghe
He even has Joe's slapping style.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTmfFLCKErY
I in no way think Pavlik is a lesser version of Kessler. Kessler was a spotlight fighter only when he fought Calzaghe and he lost. Kessler does not apply the same type of pressure Pavlik does. Kessler died down in the sight of adversity and Pavlik rises to the occasion when faced with the same problem. Pavlik is not a wild fighter! He throws punches in bunches, but he knows what he is throwing. He doesn't blindly flail away at his opponent. And also, you said Pavlik wouldn't like the amount of punches Joe throws at him, IMO, Joe won't like the amount and TYPE of punches thrown at him.
SOUTHAKRON314! I say the exact same thing! I like where your head is at!
I would take Kessler over Pavlik.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
I'm afraid I'm going to have to join the others who disagree with you on this one. No doubt Pavlik is a great fighter, and is exciting to watch, however, he's a natural middleweight, and as with every fighter moving up, it's unsure whether he'd bring the power with him, and whether the move up in weight would make him sluggish. PAvlik's got the better KO ratio, but Kessler's isn't too shabby either.
As for the chin, Pavlik's been down twice in his career (that I'm aware of), and Kessler's never been down. And when Pavlik went down against Taylor, he was on really shaky legs for a while, so for me the better chin goes to Kessler. Kessler's footwork is fairly basic, but in terms of being a sound boxer, Kessler is no less sound than Pavlik.
Well I mean you can pick yo want in a dogfight if you want.... Vegas scoring![]()
Anyway, I just simply said I would take Kessler over Pavlik with nothing to back it up. Okay I will. Kessler is a very sound boxer, technically he has a great jab. Kessler is by far more technicial than Kelly. I really don't think that is debatable. Now I am just saying I prefer the stronger, better skilled boxer over the pressure fighting of a questionably chinned Pavlik (and I never thought JT was that strong of a puncher). Sometimes it works that way, sometimes it will work the other way.
I will concede that we have yet to see Kessler fight since Calzaghe, so you may in fact have the safer bet.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks