Freddie Roach is a CNUT

[C.J.Rock]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

[JT Rock]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Ah sorry there slim, you still havent given us any Plaster concrete evidence. Why would there be sulpher or traces of it in his glove? Was he hiding matches in there for a post fight cigar

The report was pretty straight forward dude, there are only 2 people on this forum who believe Tony didnt cheat, 1 is you and the other is a low rent version of Tom Waits

Your still mediocre at best

now go back and assume the position Diane put you in

[ICB]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

How many fighters do you know, that have done this to a fighter ?

http://www.sweetfights.com/margarito014_448319437.jpg

[JazMerkin]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

How many fighters do you know, that have done this to a fighter ?

http://www.sweetfights.com/margarito014_448319437.jpg

What are you talking about Ice?? Everyone's ears & face look like that...


























... well, in Lord of the Rings they do

[LEGION]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

How many fighters do you know, that have done this to a fighter ?

http://www.sweetfights.com/margarito014_448319437.jpg

ICB that ear was ready to pop before he ever got in te ring that night; didn't surpise me one bit it blew up like a pimple. Weren't they draining it before the fight started? That was nasty though.

[LEGION]

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

How many fighters do you know, that have done this to a fighter ?

http://www.sweetfights.com/margarito014_448319437.jpg

What are you talking about Ice?? Everyone's ears & face look like that...


























... well, in Lord of the Rings they do

Lol, no doubt. He's got Orc written all over him in that pic.

[LEGION]

Hey ICB; I remember seeing Lujan and wondering if he had done BJJ as alot of jujitsu guys have that really bad cauliflower ear.

Anyways this guy James Thompson from UK had maybe even worse then Lujan and his popped open nasty like a squished grape That guy is GAME though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=084zB...eature=related

[Diane]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

[C.J.Rock]

I believe Diane just owned your a$$

Good Work

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

[ElTerribleMorales]

LOL JT If anyone has been owned its you & Diane . Look at the date of the report Diane posted . Look at the last page. It states CLEARLY!!!
The pad has been sent to the lab for analysis . This was issued BEFORE the damn pad was sent to the lab so how the hell can it have the test results on it ? Hows it feel to be OWNED !!! JT and the best part is you did it yourself buddy ROFL.
After extensive analysis and testing in the lab all that was found was a trace element of sulpher. So much for loaded gloves huh

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

dude you're beating a dead horse, Tony used plaster, it's not even suspicion anymore it's fact, how many times, no one knows but him and his trainer, get over it

[C.J.Rock]

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

dude you're beating a dead horse, Tony used plaster, it's not even suspicion anymore it's fact, how many times, no one knows but him and his trainer, get over it

If what you say could be proven Mararito would have been banned for life and rightly so. But they cannot find proof only that the pads he had were technically illegal which is why he isnt on a lifetime ban.
You guys are so quick to accuse Margarito of cheating but you ignore Moselys previous steroid abuse. Margaritos fans could easliy claim Mosely;s sudden dramatic improvement could be due to him using Hgh why is not detectable by the pee test given to fighters. But they are not haters like some of you are

[boozeboxer]

Pretty sure JT Rock and C.J. Rock are cousins.

[LEGION]

Do you even know how to read?

Here, I will try to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible, since you seem to have a problem with reading the document.

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #7
- Point #7 states that one pad was sent for analysis, and the results were that a white flaky substance was found on the pad, and within the interstices of the gauze itself. So you see, since the substance was found throughout the whole pad, it cannot be claimed as being a "trace amount".

- Look at page 3
- Look at point #8
- Hmmm, the hearing takes place.

You see, the number 8 comes after the number 7, therefore what took place on point #7, came before what happened on point #8.

You got that so far?

- Look at page 4
- Look at point #9
- Point #9 states that during the hearing the 2nd pad was at the lab to be analyzed.

You see, 2 comes after 1, therefore the 2nd pad was sent to the lab during the hearing, after the 1st pad had already been analyzed.

Are you catching on yet?

- Look at page 4
- Look at points #1 and #2 under the "Legal Conclusions" title
- Both points state it was a "plaster like substance". Now if it was sulpher only, they would not use the word plaster, because sulpher alone does not make plaster. If the commision were to use the word plaster, if in fact, it was sulpher only, they would leave themselves open for legal actions by stating the wrong substance. And if it was sulpher only, the report would have stated the word "sulpher" as the substance.

I hope that you were able to understand my explanation, I tried to explain it as simple as possible.

So when are you going to post your proof?

Just read the date on that paper when that hearing was held. The only thing discovered in the wrap was sulpher which is found in plaster but also in hand creme
The first pad was "analyzed" in the dressing room day of the
fight by the so called CA commision. Look at the date on that report.
Dont forget the wonderful CA commision's own inspector passed that wrap as OK and signed off on it too. Is that why he was later removed I wonder? lol
Provide proof that Tony Margarito knowingly tried to load his gloves and I'd be one of the first calling for a lifetime ban. Up till now no one has been able to do that

dude you're beating a dead horse, Tony used plaster, it's not even suspicion anymore it's fact, how many times, no one knows but him and his trainer, get over it

Someone call PETA!!!!

[appetite]

Yeah, what's Roach thinking? give the guy a break. Morales is way over the hill... Why not pit him with a Juan Diaz, that's is sure is a dance...

Anyway, off topic. i think it would be better if Cotto-paquiao could be at a catch weight of 145lbs... that would be the best weight these two fighters can rumble.... 143 is too paquiao sided...

What do you think guys?

[LEGION]

Yeah, what's Roach thinking? give the guy a break. Morales is way over the hill... Why not pit him with a Juan Diaz, that's is sure is a dance...

Anyway, off topic. i think it would be better if Cotto-paquiao could be at a catch weight of 145lbs... that would be the best weight these two fighters can rumble.... 143 is too paquiao sided...

What do you think guys?

Haven't you read any posts?

Welcome to Saddo's by the way.