Calzaghe beat Kessler who will go on to prove he is head and shoulders above all other comp at his own weight.
Floyd beat Corrales who went on to not be head and shoulders above the rest.
,Mark my words, Kessler beats everyone bar Calzaghe.
There were plenty who could beat Corrales and did and the same excuse your giving Oscar for being weight drained also goes for Diego![]()
Yes he was unfortunately the page isn't showing the rankings for 2008, but i know for certain he was P4P top 10 i think he was 9 or something. He's also rated 9 in the P4P rankings at the moment.
The Ring Pound For Pound Ratings
Alot of ifs no facts, Mikkel Kessler hasn't proven shit since his loss to Joe Calzaghe. The fact is Diego Corrales was P4P ranked number 5. Which means it is a better win than the Mikkel Kessler win. And Diego Corrales proved he was a hell of a fighter after that loss, Diego Corrales rehydrated alot of weight. Where as ODLH only rehydrated 1 pound, and he hadn't fought at Welterweight in years. If Diego Corrales would of fought Floyd Mayweather at 100 or 150 pounds, no matter if it was on the moon, day or night. January or December, Floyd Mayweather would of kicked his ass any time. And the fact that he dominated a P4P number 5 rated higher is bloody impressive. And it proves your other statement to be as useful as shit.
Ice,to save you running down Kessler too bad
HE WAS HURT FOR THE FIGHT
Ross you have been presented facts and the sad reality is that your hinging Calzaghe being better than Floyd on assuming Kessler's future is pathetic.
Well, call it pathetic when Kessler fails because as yet its onlt Calzaghe who could do that to him.
I find Floyd "fans" hilarious, they are so sure their fighter is so head and shoulders above the rest but yet they still need to defend the opposition he fought, a few were neames in their own right, just not when Floyd fought them, a few were coming off losses as well
Ill keep thinking Joe beats Floyd and anyone else, your wasting your time, ive seen Joe in action and hes a marvel, at 36 and doing what he does after 12 years unbroken reign as a world champ, Floyd wont match that, no one will![]()
Wow! This thread is still running on an on.. Makes quite funny reading!!![]()
no bud the reason why joe was never ranked above floyd is because Mayweather was willing to get in with top level competition while both were in their prime and he'd win convincingly, and not leave a bad taste in your mouth, i.e. Calzaghe/Hopkins, also floyd's never technically been knocked down, Calzaghe has been dropped plenty, especially in his last 2 fights, both in the 1st round, and both against OLD past prime fighters
![]()
Weird havent heard anything intelligent and profound by Ross yet,
Especially after he has been presented with hardcore facts about Floyds career accomplishments and level of competition, compared to his fortune telling of Kessler's career..
Which defining fight did Floyd have to prove how good he was?
Calzaghe was thought to have been fading and too old after his faultless performance against Lacy to be a threat against the big strong powerfull Kessler, yet he proved how good he is by figuring him out, eating up his best shots, he really proved his worth especially at his age and how long hed been at the top.
Floyd doesnt have that icing on the cake![]()
That makes no logical sense. A fighter, less than two years removed from an amazing performance, coming off wins over fighters who did not damaged him in any way, was thought to be faded and old? Almost nobody felt that way.
I like Kessler, a lot, but he has proven sweet fuck all since the Calzaghe fight.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks