Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Not in terms of who’s the better fighter because when you are dealing with fantasy matchups, that tends to get a bit ugly and gray but as far as what you are seeing when you see Wlad in the ring, you’re getting a poor man’s Lennox Lewis. It’s all because of Emmanuel Steward too, who with as great of a trainer as he is, has gone on what seems to be a personal quest to make boxing as boring as it can possibly be. Or maybe that’s a misconception but it seems to me that Steward has taken everything that worked with Lennox, good or bad, multiplied it by two and added an extra dose of caution.

    I just watched the fight with Ibragimov and it was almost painful. Left hand, left hand, left hand, rinse and repeat. Lewis did that to an extent in that he used the jab a lot and since he was a big guy it really exaggerated the size advantage he had over his opponents. But even though he was very much a balanced, control fighter he was a guy who would at least take some of the necessary risks to not make you forget that you were watching a fight and not a chess match.

    Wlad Klitschko does nothing in the ring that is going to put him in any risk at all. He’s gone with the same formula Lewis won with, that’s to ride the jab and a big frame to the title but there has got to be something else. The right hand of Wladimir Klitschko is non-existant. I don’t want to hear that Ibragimov has a tricky style that makes the right hand to much of a risk, because even Steward said to Klitschko that the right hand has got to come in somewhere so that the arena didn’t revolt. The right hand never came.

    Not only does he not throw the right hand but Wladimir won’t work at a distance he isn’t comfortable at. That’s not a problem in itself as that is the case with most boxers but Wladimir deals with it differently. He holds. A lot. That is the root of the problem. There is nothing more boring then a one dimensional fight and when Wlad goes out that’s what you get. You can’t have a heavyweight champion who doesn’t fight on the inside and Wlad flat out just does not throw punches when he has to bend his arms a bit. It’s annoying. Beyond annoying.

    Jermain Taylor did the same thing under Steward’s direction. Lewis was beat up a lot in the press because he could keep a guy outside all night with a jab and literally just beat the will out of people. But if he was tested on the inside he could go too. Watch the second Rahman fight and it’s pretty clear that there was some fight there from Lewis beyond that controlling style. Wladimir has that same controlling style but doesn’t have that second dimension. Klitschko fans like to do a lot of talking about the injustices they were done against Sam Peter but look at it through a different lens. What more could Peter have done other then hit Wlad in the head? When Klitschko’s holding didn’t work he would just completely turn away from the fight on the inside.

    I can see how a lot of people can easily get behind Klitschko because he is a monster and when he has an opponent at the end of his jab he is pretty much unbeatable but his handling of fighters when they get close is beyond ridiculous. It’s nice to be cerebral and it’s nice to lampoon your chess playing as a testament to the strategic nature of his fighting style but Klitschko is getting by on holding, dominating by holding. Something has got to be done. He controls range by holding just as much as he does with the jab and it’s not fair. Hopefully his next opponent, whoever that is, makes a case about this before the fight to put the referee on notice.
    Until then, watching Wlad is just like watching a poor man’s Lennox Lewis. He fights great and makes use of distance very well with a gaudy left hand but he doesn’t take any risks and he grabs hold of guys who get a little to close for comfort.

    Hopefully this improves, but as long as he is allowed to win the way he does, it won’t. That is all.

  2. #2
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    I don't think the statements about "dominating by holding" are fair. Wladimir works at a distance, if an opponent gets past the jab and works to the inside holding is perfect technique....Lennox Lewis did that and he also pushed off a lot and I think that is how Wlad should mix this up and stay away from the holding, people are watching to see if he gets in a clinch just so they can say "Oh there he goes again, he always holds!". You let a fighter get inside your reach and let his hands stay free then you're going to be in big trouble and you should know that.

    Wladimir doesn't hold any more or any less than the champions of similar styles did before him: Ali, Holmes, Lewis.

    This is the way tall fighters fight, Wladimir puts on a performance to show how to use height and reach....and sometimes that style looks bad.

    It was a bad style match up and everyone has those nights

  3. #3
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Wladimir knows he needs to have a showing like:

    Vitali Klitschko - Kirk Johnson
    Lennox Lewis - Michael Grant
    Lennox Lewis - Andrew Golota


    For Wladimir's next fight he needs someone dangerous and someone who has not been KO'd. My choices are as follows:

    1. Nikolay Valuev - He's big, easy to hit, and a KO of him would prove visually impressive.

    2. Alexander Povetkin - he's unbeaten, a boxer/puncher and supposed to be the heir to the division....he is also easy to hit.

    3. Ruslan Chagaev - I don't think his defense is like Sultan's but his offense might be better. He's solid and a tough fighter if Wladimir can KO him then that would be impressive.

    4. Cris Arreola - he's a brawler and a pressure fighter, he has fast hands and good power but he is unproven against the contenders.

    5. Alexander Dimitrenko - he's big, tall, and undefeated. KO-ing anyone near his same height would prove impressive and he poses virtually no KO threat but he too is unproven vs the contenders

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1335
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Excellent posting Amat. I just watched the fight today(and god knows why, after I'd heard how horrible it was). I was disgusted with how tentative Wlad was in there. Your absolutely right in that he didn't take a single risk in the fight, especially since I didn't think there was all that much risk there, even if he had been aggressive.. Sure he could have been countered if he overcommited to the right hand, but he never even used it to feel out. People who compare that performance with the way Mayweather or Hopkins fight smart, are kidding themselves. Mayweather may not throw his chin out there, but he takes the openings that are there, as does Hopkins or any smart fighter. They at least test their opponents, see what kind of punishment they can take, etc.. Wlad just didn't seem to bother even trying to do anything but the bare minimum he needed to in order to win the rounds. That was not a display of intelligent boxing whatsoever imo, as like I say, he did nothing to create or capitalize on any opening Sultan gave him. The jab was simply a punch he could always land do to his physical advantages. He showed very little boxing IQ if you ask me. I've always hated watching Wlad fight too, though I do respect he has incredible punching power and is a very good athlete. He just lacks some intangibles, that I think would cost him dearly if the HW division was not so poor at the moment.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    US--FL
    Posts
    462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1035
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Excellent posting Amat. I just watched the fight today(and god knows why, after I'd heard how horrible it was). I was disgusted with how tentative Wlad was in there. Your absolutely right in that he didn't take a single risk in the fight, especially since I didn't think there was all that much risk there, even if he had been aggressive.. Sure he could have been countered if he overcommited to the right hand, but he never even used it to feel out. People who compare that performance with the way Mayweather or Hopkins fight smart, are kidding themselves. Mayweather may not throw his chin out there, but he takes the openings that are there, as does Hopkins or any smart fighter. They at least test their opponents, see what kind of punishment they can take, etc.. Wlad just didn't seem to bother even trying to do anything but the bare minimum he needed to in order to win the rounds. That was not a display of intelligent boxing whatsoever imo, as like I say, he did nothing to create or capitalize on any opening Sultan gave him. The jab was simply a punch he could always land do to his physical advantages. He showed very little boxing IQ if you ask me. I've always hated watching Wlad fight too, though I do respect he has incredible punching power and is a very good athlete. He just lacks some intangibles, that I think would cost him dearly if the HW division was not so poor at the moment.

    Ditto to amat & p4pk

    I find it amazing how the commentators can have such an intelligent conversation on the use of holding, but it was a different story when it was John Ruiz doing the same thing. He is giving us John Ruiz level action and it is now considered to be the best in the division!

    The fighter-that hasn't been KO'd-that WK needs to fight-is Tony Thompson. And while everyone is doing their best to ignore him and not cover his fights, he is now #9 on the Ring & still undefeated since his 4 round decision loss in 2000. Not only is he the WBO mandatory, but it would also be a great US / Ukraine promotion.

  6. #6
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Fine you fight a shorter fighter and let them have their hands free when they get on the inside.


    Comparing Wlad to Ruiz is just fucking stupid

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    I don't think the statements about "dominating by holding" are fair. Wladimir works at a distance, if an opponent gets past the jab and works to the inside holding is perfect technique....Lennox Lewis did that and he also pushed off a lot and I think that is how Wlad should mix this up and stay away from the holding, people are watching to see if he gets in a clinch just so they can say "Oh there he goes again, he always holds!". You let a fighter get inside your reach and let his hands stay free then you're going to be in big trouble and you should know that.

    Wladimir doesn't hold any more or any less than the champions of similar styles did before him: Ali, Holmes, Lewis.

    This is the way tall fighters fight, Wladimir puts on a performance to show how to use height and reach....and sometimes that style looks bad.

    It was a bad style match up and everyone has those nights
    Holding shouldn't be a technique, and while it is, Wladimir definitely takes it to an extreme by using an illegal technique so much that his opponent has next to no chance to win. And I'm not just talking about Ibragimov either because let's be honest he was never going to beat Klitschko.

    It's not so much how much holding he does but the fact that it is the only thing he does. I don't think Ali, Holmes and Lewis (especially) held nearly as much as Wladimir does but even if they did, it's not all they did. All did plenty of punching on the inside and Klitschko doesn't.

    And pushing off is hardly the same as holding. Lewis did a lot of pushing, so did Ali but at least that keeps the fight going.

    As for his next opponents, Chagaev is the next logical step of course and is the fight I would most like to see in the heavyweight division. I don't think Arreola factors in yet and same goes for Dimitrenko who from what I read did not look at all impressive in his last outing.

    Valuev - Klitschko is an interesting one that I wouldn't mind seeing and I think it's a bit to early for Povetkin and he would probably go the way of Ibragimov and Brock before him.
    Last edited by amat; 02-25-2008 at 04:41 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1073
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    I don't think the statements about "dominating by holding" are fair. Wladimir works at a distance, if an opponent gets past the jab and works to the inside holding is perfect technique....Lennox Lewis did that and he also pushed off a lot and I think that is how Wlad should mix this up and stay away from the holding, people are watching to see if he gets in a clinch just so they can say "Oh there he goes again, he always holds!". You let a fighter get inside your reach and let his hands stay free then you're going to be in big trouble and you should know that.

    Wladimir doesn't hold any more or any less than the champions of similar styles did before him: Ali, Holmes, Lewis.

    This is the way tall fighters fight, Wladimir puts on a performance to show how to use height and reach....and sometimes that style looks bad.

    It was a bad style match up and everyone has those nights
    Indeed. It was a bad style match-up. But that being said, the holding comes right out of the Steward play-book. He's looking quite similar to Lewis. From what I've heard and read, Sultan is one tough S.O.B. and stood in there with a heavy-handed puncher for 12. That's pretty admirable in my neck of the woods.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1273
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Quote Originally Posted by The Shadow View Post
    Indeed. It was a bad style match-up. But that being said, the holding comes right out of the Steward play-book. He's looking quite similar to Lewis. From what I've heard and read, Sultan is one tough S.O.B. and stood in there with a heavy-handed puncher for 12. That's pretty admirable in my neck of the woods.
    Wlad only let his right hand go about 2 times in the whole fight.

  10. #10
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Quote Originally Posted by littlebif View Post
    Wlad only let his right hand go about 2 times in the whole fight.
    hyperboles are not needed to try to get your point across....Wladimir landed a lot more than 2 right hands.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    I think Wlad boxed badly...

    And he still won against a world class opponent.

    You've GOT to be good to have an off night and still win.
    091

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1506
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    They are different fighters. Lennox was faster, and he had a better chin. Lennox was the better athlete though Wlad is a great athlete, but Wlad is stronger and bigger than Lennox. Lennox was more of a complete boxer who could go the body early in his career, he could box you, he could throw every punch in the book. Wlad throws three punches the jab, the cross, and the left hook, and his jab is as power as Foreman's but as accurate as Holmes'... it is truly the best jab I have seen since Holmes'. Because of Wlad's weak chin I think his style is much more oriented around his jab than Lennox's style was, that makes him less exciting to some, but I love both of them.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Ok people hold alot and it is nothing new Wlad may not be a Lewis but hey he is trying and who knows but then again Lewis is one of the best heavyweights to ever fight.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Not in terms of who’s the better fighter because when you are dealing with fantasy matchups, that tends to get a bit ugly and gray but as far as what you are seeing when you see Wlad in the ring, you’re getting a poor man’s Lennox Lewis. It’s all because of Emmanuel Steward too, who with as great of a trainer as he is, has gone on what seems to be a personal quest to make boxing as boring as it can possibly be. Or maybe that’s a misconception but it seems to me that Steward has taken everything that worked with Lennox, good or bad, multiplied it by two and added an extra dose of caution.

    I just watched the fight with Ibragimov and it was almost painful. Left hand, left hand, left hand, rinse and repeat. Lewis did that to an extent in that he used the jab a lot and since he was a big guy it really exaggerated the size advantage he had over his opponents. But even though he was very much a balanced, control fighter he was a guy who would at least take some of the necessary risks to not make you forget that you were watching a fight and not a chess match.

    Wlad Klitschko does nothing in the ring that is going to put him in any risk at all. He’s gone with the same formula Lewis won with, that’s to ride the jab and a big frame to the title but there has got to be something else. The right hand of Wladimir Klitschko is non-existant. I don’t want to hear that Ibragimov has a tricky style that makes the right hand to much of a risk, because even Steward said to Klitschko that the right hand has got to come in somewhere so that the arena didn’t revolt. The right hand never came.

    Not only does he not throw the right hand but Wladimir won’t work at a distance he isn’t comfortable at. That’s not a problem in itself as that is the case with most boxers but Wladimir deals with it differently. He holds. A lot. That is the root of the problem. There is nothing more boring then a one dimensional fight and when Wlad goes out that’s what you get. You can’t have a heavyweight champion who doesn’t fight on the inside and Wlad flat out just does not throw punches when he has to bend his arms a bit. It’s annoying. Beyond annoying.

    Jermain Taylor did the same thing under Steward’s direction. Lewis was beat up a lot in the press because he could keep a guy outside all night with a jab and literally just beat the will out of people. But if he was tested on the inside he could go too. Watch the second Rahman fight and it’s pretty clear that there was some fight there from Lewis beyond that controlling style. Wladimir has that same controlling style but doesn’t have that second dimension. Klitschko fans like to do a lot of talking about the injustices they were done against Sam Peter but look at it through a different lens. What more could Peter have done other then hit Wlad in the head? When Klitschko’s holding didn’t work he would just completely turn away from the fight on the inside.

    I can see how a lot of people can easily get behind Klitschko because he is a monster and when he has an opponent at the end of his jab he is pretty much unbeatable but his handling of fighters when they get close is beyond ridiculous. It’s nice to be cerebral and it’s nice to lampoon your chess playing as a testament to the strategic nature of his fighting style but Klitschko is getting by on holding, dominating by holding. Something has got to be done. He controls range by holding just as much as he does with the jab and it’s not fair. Hopefully his next opponent, whoever that is, makes a case about this before the fight to put the referee on notice.
    Until then, watching Wlad is just like watching a poor man’s Lennox Lewis. He fights great and makes use of distance very well with a gaudy left hand but he doesn’t take any risks and he grabs hold of guys who get a little to close for comfort.

    Hopefully this improves, but as long as he is allowed to win the way he does, it won’t. That is all.
    This is a good post.

    And I totally agree about Steward, hopefully he won't make watching Andy Lee unbearable, haven't seen that so far but who knows.

    I've actually come around to liking Wlad outside of the ring, seems like a good guy unless he's just a good actor, but inside the ring I'm just not a fan.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir Klitschko Is A Poor Man's Lennox Lewis

    You guys act like this is the only boring fight to ever happen i mean not like Waldimar goes to the cards all the time but i will say this i miss Lewis.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 73
    Last Post: 08-10-2007, 06:41 PM
  2. Replies: 74
    Last Post: 01-16-2007, 10:15 AM
  3. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-06-2006, 06:48 AM
  4. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 08:19 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 07:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing