-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
you know. seeing that. I can totally see why Bilbo thinks he was being a pussy.
haha ;D Barrera is too much of a warrior... and that cost him the loss to Amir...
My concern is that cut might affect MAB's future fight plans... Might as well call it a day...
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
SB. It will certainly take a long time to heal.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Sure we would, Barrera would have battered him silly, we just wouldnt have had a chorus of 'poor Amir, should have been a NC'.
Good performance from Amir, much improved, not as improved as Jim Watt would have us believe but improved nonetheless ;D
Now if he could just stop trying to lead with a right uppercut from 8 feet away and sticking his hands in the air every time he successfully negotiates a clip on the chin I'll be happy.
Watt does get carried away at times.
I couldn't believe it in the 4th round (i tink) Watt said something like - "Khans chin problem has been solved, he doesn't get hit on it anymore" ;D.. i'm sure I heard Ian Darke gulp.
Lucky Jim swerved the commentators curse this time.
Jim Watt has to be one of the worst commentators of all time. I never get why they don't give it to Johnny Nelson, as he seems the only one of Sky who can offer insight without sounding like a biased pompous buffoon, and he's generally the one to call fights right.
I still remember Watt in the Mayweather fight, suggesting that the judges might have Hatton ahead at the time of the stoppage. Comedy gold in a fight that at best Hatton was winning 3 rounds of
I don't think Watt is so bad. He does have some very bad days though.
Johnny's a good talker but i get the impression he doesn't watch much boxing away from his job. I'm sure he did a Casamayor fight recently and commented it was the first time he'd seen him ;D
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That cut is horrendous, even deeper and longer than I thought it was with the blood wiped away.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That cut is horrendous, even deeper and longer than I thought it was with the blood wiped away.
It's long but no way to tell from the picture how deep it is...;) BTW, I didn't read in the RBR thread your post calling to stop the fight... Or did I miss it?? ... ;)
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That cut is horrendous, even deeper and longer than I thought it was with the blood wiped away.
It's long but no way to tell from the picture how deep it is...;) BTW, I didn't read in the RBR thread your post calling to stop the fight... Or did I miss it?? ... ;)
.
Oh, come on now he has an Aladdin Sane lightning bolt down the side of his head! It's a monster cut to have, and even if we cannot specify it's depth we can see how long it is and remember how it was spurting and gushing. It's a horrible cut, I don't think it needs debating.
I don't recall posting at all on the RBR during the fight. I was too busy actually watching it. I posted prior to it starting and afterwards, not at all while the fight was actually happening though. Just because I did not jump into the RBR does not mean I didn't think it should have been stopped. Personally, I would have had it stopped in the second and definitely the doctor should have disallowed Marco to continue in the fourth.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
It was a bad cut, a very bad cut that had no signs of being able to stop the blood between rounds and it was a no brainer that the fight had to be stopped.
But why the hell do these cutsmen insist on getting that face iron out to rub down any bumps when what is clearly needed for a cut that bad is 45odd seconds of constant pressure with a towel followed by 15 applying vaseline to aid the wound!
simple really
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
That cut is horrendous, even deeper and longer than I thought it was with the blood wiped away.
It's long but no way to tell from the picture how deep it is...;) BTW, I didn't read in the RBR thread your post calling to stop the fight... Or did I miss it?? ... ;)
.
Oh, come on now he has an Aladdin Sane lightning bolt down the side of his head! It's a monster cut to have, and even if we cannot specify it's depth we can see how long it is and remember how it was spurting and gushing. It's a horrible cut, I don't think it needs debating.
I don't recall posting at all on the RBR during the fight. I was too busy actually watching it. I posted prior to it starting and afterwards, not at all while the fight was actually happening though. Just because I did not jump into the RBR does not mean I didn't think it should have been stopped. Personally, I would have had it stopped in the second and definitely the doctor should have disallowed Marco to continue in the fourth.
Many believed it's Marco's warrior attitude that prevented him from saying "I can't see anymore" or "I'm having headache"... Just last week, many also labeled Robert Guerrero a quitter for pulling out from his fight with Yordan in the 2nd round after he suffered a cut that resulted the fight as a no contest (NC)... Would you be upset if Barrera quit after the 1st round?? Would you call him a quitter??
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Cut or not, the fight was a NO CONTEST.
Seeing how bad MAB did against a complete NOBODY vs Freudis Rojas
Freudis Rojas
What did team Barrera expect?
I give them kudos for trying to fight on but Con was just too fast for the old warrior. MAB never belonged in the same weight class as Con. The fight proved nothing and Con needs to prove himself against Prescott again, we don't need to look any further than Prescott. I see Con getting knocked out again soon unless he continues to fight old guys who have been way past their prime or he continues to fight nobodys but they are trying to build a world champion so he is going to have to step it up in the next couple of years.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
It's long but no way to tell from the picture how deep it is...;) BTW, I didn't read in the RBR thread your post calling to stop the fight... Or did I miss it?? ... ;)
.
Oh, come on now he has an Aladdin Sane lightning bolt down the side of his head! It's a monster cut to have, and even if we cannot specify it's depth we can see how long it is and remember how it was spurting and gushing. It's a horrible cut, I don't think it needs debating.
I don't recall posting at all on the RBR during the fight. I was too busy actually watching it. I posted prior to it starting and afterwards, not at all while the fight was actually happening though. Just because I did not jump into the RBR does not mean I didn't think it should have been stopped. Personally, I would have had it stopped in the second and definitely the doctor should have disallowed Marco to continue in the fourth.
Many believed it's Marco's warrior attitude that prevented him from saying "I can't see anymore" or "I'm having headache"... Just last week, many also labeled Robert Guerrero a quitter for pulling out from his fight with Yordan in the 2nd round after he suffered a cut that resulted the fight as a no contest (NC)... Would you be upset if Barrera quit after the 1st round?? Would you call him a quitter??
.
I would have been dissapointed for the fight to end like that, but that is the worst cut I have seen in recent memory. If Barrera immediately agreed to a rematch upon the fight being declared a NC then Barrera wouldn't be labelled a quitter. I recall the Guerrero cut being less serious than this was.
Barrera is too much of a warrior and his corner should have been forcing him to stop. Mistakes were made out there, and Khan now has the scalp of MAB on his record because of it.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Oh, come on now he has an Aladdin Sane lightning bolt down the side of his head! It's a monster cut to have, and even if we cannot specify it's depth we can see how long it is and remember how it was spurting and gushing. It's a horrible cut, I don't think it needs debating.
I don't recall posting at all on the RBR during the fight. I was too busy actually watching it. I posted prior to it starting and afterwards, not at all while the fight was actually happening though. Just because I did not jump into the RBR does not mean I didn't think it should have been stopped. Personally, I would have had it stopped in the second and definitely the doctor should have disallowed Marco to continue in the fourth.
Many believed it's Marco's warrior attitude that prevented him from saying "I can't see anymore" or "I'm having headache"... Just last week, many also labeled Robert Guerrero a quitter for pulling out from his fight with Yordan in the 2nd round after he suffered a cut that resulted the fight as a no contest (NC)... Would you be upset if Barrera quit after the 1st round?? Would you call him a quitter??
.
I would have been dissapointed for the fight to end like that, but that is the worst cut I have seen in recent memory. If Barrera immediately agreed to a rematch upon the fight being declared a NC then Barrera wouldn't be labelled a quitter. I recall the Guerrero cut being less serious than this was.
Barrera is too much of a warrior and his corner should have been forcing him to stop. Mistakes were made out there, and Khan now has the scalp of MAB on his record because of it.
There you go, Guerrero's cut is less serious but he quit...
Barrera decided to fight on despite a very serious cut and lost by technical decision...
During the course of the fight, do you have any inkling that Barrera might land that one big punch that can turn the fight around??
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Many believed it's Marco's warrior attitude that prevented him from saying "I can't see anymore" or "I'm having headache"... Just last week, many also labeled Robert Guerrero a quitter for pulling out from his fight with Yordan in the 2nd round after he suffered a cut that resulted the fight as a no contest (NC)... Would you be upset if Barrera quit after the 1st round?? Would you call him a quitter??
.
I would have been dissapointed for the fight to end like that, but that is the worst cut I have seen in recent memory. If Barrera immediately agreed to a rematch upon the fight being declared a NC then Barrera wouldn't be labelled a quitter. I recall the Guerrero cut being less serious than this was.
Barrera is too much of a warrior and his corner should have been forcing him to stop. Mistakes were made out there, and Khan now has the scalp of MAB on his record because of it.
There you go, Guerrero's cut is less serious but he quit...
Barrera decided to fight on despite a very serious cut and lost by technical decision...
During the course of the fight, do you have any inkling that Barrera might land that one big punch that can turn the fight around??
It isn't up to him
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Many believed it's Marco's warrior attitude that prevented him from saying "I can't see anymore" or "I'm having headache"... Just last week, many also labeled Robert Guerrero a quitter for pulling out from his fight with Yordan in the 2nd round after he suffered a cut that resulted the fight as a no contest (NC)... Would you be upset if Barrera quit after the 1st round?? Would you call him a quitter??
.
I would have been dissapointed for the fight to end like that, but that is the worst cut I have seen in recent memory. If Barrera immediately agreed to a rematch upon the fight being declared a NC then Barrera wouldn't be labelled a quitter. I recall the Guerrero cut being less serious than this was.
Barrera is too much of a warrior and his corner should have been forcing him to stop. Mistakes were made out there, and Khan now has the scalp of MAB on his record because of it.
There you go, Guerrero's cut is less serious but he quit...
Barrera decided to fight on despite a very serious cut and lost by technical decision...
During the course of the fight, do you have any inkling that Barrera might land that one big punch that can turn the fight around??
Barrera should have quit, but I'm not the guy in Barrera's head controlling his thought mechanisms. He must have known he was down on the cards and his performance was seriously hindered by the injury. Really the 4th when he saw the doctor should have been the time to give it a rest.
I think without the cut Barrera would have tested Khan a lot more and probably knocked him out. I always said Khan would start fast and that Barrera would take a few rounds to adjust to Khans speed. The cut made even doing that nigh on impossible.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I would have been dissapointed for the fight to end like that, but that is the worst cut I have seen in recent memory. If Barrera immediately agreed to a rematch upon the fight being declared a NC then Barrera wouldn't be labelled a quitter. I recall the Guerrero cut being less serious than this was.
Barrera is too much of a warrior and his corner should have been forcing him to stop. Mistakes were made out there, and Khan now has the scalp of MAB on his record because of it.
There you go, Guerrero's cut is less serious but he quit...
Barrera decided to fight on despite a very serious cut and lost by technical decision...
During the course of the fight, do you have any inkling that Barrera might land that one big punch that can turn the fight around??
Barrera should have quit, but I'm not the guy in Barrera's head controlling his thought mechanisms. He must have known he was down on the cards and his performance was seriously hindered by the injury. Really the 4th when he saw the doctor should have been the time to give it a rest.
I think without the cut Barrera would have tested Khan a lot more and probably knocked him out. I always said Khan would start fast and that Barrera would take a few rounds to adjust to Khans speed. The cut made even doing that nigh on impossible.
Aside from the warrior attitude, what's your assessment why Barrera continued to fight on?? Isn't it Barrera thinking of winning the fight, right??
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I would have been dissapointed for the fight to end like that, but that is the worst cut I have seen in recent memory. If Barrera immediately agreed to a rematch upon the fight being declared a NC then Barrera wouldn't be labelled a quitter. I recall the Guerrero cut being less serious than this was.
Barrera is too much of a warrior and his corner should have been forcing him to stop. Mistakes were made out there, and Khan now has the scalp of MAB on his record because of it.
There you go, Guerrero's cut is less serious but he quit...
Barrera decided to fight on despite a very serious cut and lost by technical decision...
During the course of the fight, do you have any inkling that Barrera might land that one big punch that can turn the fight around??
Barrera should have quit, but I'm not the guy in Barrera's head controlling his thought mechanisms. He must have known he was down on the cards and his performance was seriously hindered by the injury. Really the 4th when he saw the doctor should have been the time to give it a rest.
I think without the cut Barrera would have tested Khan a lot more and probably knocked him out. I always said Khan would start fast and that Barrera would take a few rounds to adjust to Khans speed. The cut made even doing that nigh on impossible.
Aside from the warrior attitude, what's your assessment why Barrera continued to fight on?? Isn't it Barrera thinking of winning the fight even with that serious cut, right??
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
There you go, Guerrero's cut is less serious but he quit...
Barrera decided to fight on despite a very serious cut and lost by technical decision...
During the course of the fight, do you have any inkling that Barrera might land that one big punch that can turn the fight around??
Barrera should have quit, but I'm not the guy in Barrera's head controlling his thought mechanisms. He must have known he was down on the cards and his performance was seriously hindered by the injury. Really the 4th when he saw the doctor should have been the time to give it a rest.
I think without the cut Barrera would have tested Khan a lot more and probably knocked him out. I always said Khan would start fast and that Barrera would take a few rounds to adjust to Khans speed. The cut made even doing that nigh on impossible.
Aside from the warrior attitude, what's your assessment why Barrera continued to fight on?? Isn't it Barrera thinking of winning the fight, right??
.
I don't know. I would love to find out what the doctor said to Barrera and what Barrera said back to him. There was no need to carry on with such a disadvantage.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
they all think they can win. I'm sure Nicky Cook after getting knocked down twice and getting up on shaky legs thought he could win. Thats why the corner is there, the ref is there and the doctor is there.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Barrera should have quit, but I'm not the guy in Barrera's head controlling his thought mechanisms. He must have known he was down on the cards and his performance was seriously hindered by the injury. Really the 4th when he saw the doctor should have been the time to give it a rest.
I think without the cut Barrera would have tested Khan a lot more and probably knocked him out. I always said Khan would start fast and that Barrera would take a few rounds to adjust to Khans speed. The cut made even doing that nigh on impossible.
Aside from the warrior attitude, what's your assessment why Barrera continued to fight on?? Isn't it Barrera thinking of winning the fight, right??
.
I don't know. I would love to find out what the doctor said to Barrera and what Barrera said back to him. There was no need to carry on with such a disadvantage.
IMO, Barrera decided to fight on thinking of winning the fight by shatering Amir's glass jaw... What's the purpose of continuing to fight is definitely to eventually win the fight... I still have to met a boxer who decided to fight on just to achieve a draw or worst, to get a loss...
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J_C
Just trying to gauge opinion on this really. Im not well up on the rules behind it, I think ive only witnessed 1 no contest and it was a long time ago.
It just seemed a wee bit odd to me that it should be allowed to go just long enough to go to the cards for a cut that happened in the 1st round. Or was this fairly standard procedure? Do they generally try to let it go long enough to get a scorecard outcome? As I said im not really up on no contest rules etc so ive not formed a concrete opinion.
It was a no contest from the first bell.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
yes. if it wasn't for the cut Barrera would have killed Amir somewhere round the 9/10th round.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Here's an article where MAB's cutman talks about the cut. I guess it was 3 inches long, and he ended up getting 30 stitches.
Michael Marley'�s Boxing Confidential� News, Analysis, and Commentary
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diane
That was a NASTY cut indeed.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
If I am not mistaken, the score cards come into effect after the 4th round. It looked like Barrera was given the opportunity, and was probably advised at the time. So the loss is all on Barrera and his team.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Aside from the warrior attitude, what's your assessment why Barrera continued to fight on?? Isn't it Barrera thinking of winning the fight, right??
.
I don't know. I would love to find out what the doctor said to Barrera and what Barrera said back to him. There was no need to carry on with such a disadvantage.
IMO, Barrera decided to fight on thinking of winning the fight by shatering Amir's glass jaw... What's the purpose of continuing to fight is definitely to eventually win the fight... I still have to met a boxer who decided to fight on just to achieve a draw or worst, to get a loss...
.
obviously every fighter thinks they can win the fight, no one is gonna go on with an attitude of "shit, i'm done and have nothing left, but let me continue to take damage" :rolleyes: that'd be an idiot bud, stop trying to instigate, Arce aside from maybe one round was getting hammered and mauled against Darchinyan yet continued on until they finally stepped in and decided he couldn't continue
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
If I am not mistaken, the score cards come into effect after the 4th round. It looked like Barrera was given the opportunity, and was probably advised at the time. So the loss is all on Barrera and his team.
It is also the job of the ref, and the ringside doctor, to look out for the best interest of a fighter. When a man has a 3 inch gash on his head, that is spewing blood uncontrollably, then the doctor should be stopping the fight even if the fighter thinks he can continue. What doctor would allow a person that gets a 3 inch cut on his head in the 1st round, to continue fighting, and risking the cut to be ripped open even more? That was an incompetent doctor if you ask me.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
I think it is 100% safe to blame MAB entirely on the cut. That cut was horrible, MAB would have beaten Khan if it weren't for the headbutt.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diane
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
If I am not mistaken, the score cards come into effect after the 4th round. It looked like Barrera was given the opportunity, and was probably advised at the time. So the loss is all on Barrera and his team.
It is also the job of the ref, and the ringside doctor, to look out for the best interest of a fighter. When a man has a 3 inch gash on his head, that is spewing blood uncontrollably, then the doctor should be stopping the fight even if the fighter thinks he can continue. What doctor would allow a person that gets a 3 inch cut on his head in the 1st round, to continue fighting, and risking the cut to be ripped open even more? That was an incompetent doctor if you ask me.
I didn't really give it that much thought........... I'm convinced... yep... your right! so then why didn't they stop it sooner? I'd still give 40% of the blame to MAB. How do I change my vote? :dontknow:
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diane
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
If I am not mistaken, the score cards come into effect after the 4th round. It looked like Barrera was given the opportunity, and was probably advised at the time. So the loss is all on Barrera and his team.
It is also the job of the ref, and the ringside doctor, to look out for the best interest of a fighter. When a man has a 3 inch gash on his head, that is spewing blood uncontrollably, then the doctor should be stopping the fight even if the fighter thinks he can continue. What doctor would allow a person that gets a 3 inch cut on his head in the 1st round, to continue fighting, and risking the cut to be ripped open even more? That was an incompetent doctor if you ask me.
It's a disgrace. And I'm still livid about it all. :mad::mad::mad::mad:
They could see the bloody skull?? How was this fight not stopped? This is borderline criminal that Barrera was allowed to continue!!!! :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I don't know. I would love to find out what the doctor said to Barrera and what Barrera said back to him. There was no need to carry on with such a disadvantage.
IMO, Barrera decided to fight on thinking of winning the fight by shatering Amir's glass jaw... What's the purpose of continuing to fight is definitely to eventually win the fight... I still have to met a boxer who decided to fight on just to achieve a draw or worst, to get a loss...
.
obviously every fighter thinks they can win the fight, no one is gonna go on with an attitude of "shit, i'm done and have nothing left, but let me continue to take damage" :rolleyes: that'd be an idiot bud, stop trying to instigate, Arce aside from maybe one round was getting hammered and mauled against Darchinyan yet continued on until they finally stepped in and decided he couldn't continue
They decided to continue fighting coz they're still hoping to land that punch that can turn the fight around... Warrior attitude is also one reason... They're hesitant to call it quits... They want a 3rd party (doctor, referee) to do it for them to save them the criticism of being labeled as a quitter...
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
You can't really please everybody...
Boxer quits and he's criticized being a quitter...
Boxer fights on and he's criticized for being too brave for his own good...
Referee/Doctor stops the fight and criticized doing it too early...
Referee/Doctor didn't stop the fight and criticized being incompetent...
Only a few had called it correctly on the right time... Well, this is boxing... and surely you'll still encounter more of these situations in the future...
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
You can't really please everybody...
Boxer quits and he's criticized being a quitter...
Boxer fights on and he's criticized for being too brave for his own good...
Referee/Doctor stops the fight and criticized doing it too early...
Referee/Doctor didn't stop the fight and criticized being incompetent...
Only a few had called it correctly on the right time... Well, this is boxing... and surely you'll still encounter more of these situations in the future...
.
I hope I never see a fighter with an injury like that allowed to go on EVER again. It doesn't matter who they are, and it's not about quitting or showing heart, it's about doing the right thing and looking after the safety of the fighters.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
I agree, it should have been a no contest had Barrera decided to quit. However, Barrera did not quit because he wanted to take the risk. Probably thinking that he could TKO khan. Khan did not give him the chance to do that so I give credits to Khan.
Had Barrera incidentally TKoed Khan with a lucky shot, the story would have been different. People would praise him for it and he will be back in the game again. Unfortunately for him, the tide did not go with him. Barrera took the risk and must suffer for it. Credit should be given to Khan.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brucelee
I agree, it should have been a no contest had Barrera decided to quit. However, Barrera did not quit because he wanted to take the risk. Probably thinking that he could TKO khan. Khan did not give him the chance to do that so I give credits to Khan.
Had Barrera incidentally TKoed Khan with a lucky shot, the story would have been different. People would praise him for it and he will be back in the game again. Unfortunately for him, the tide did not go with him. Barrera took the risk and must suffer for it. Credit should be given to Khan.
It's not about quitting it's about looking after the health interests of the fighter. Barrera never quit, he doesn't have that in him, but it should have been stopped by those officiating and his corner should have pulled him out. There was no way the blood could be stopped and his performance suffered immensely because of it.
You are just trying to twist things, using words like quit.
How can Khan be given credit for that victory? I give him credit for winning rounds against a fighter cut as badly as can possibly be. But Khan hasn't proven anything with that empty win. Of course, Barrera would have been given credit if he managed to stop Khan after that butt, it would have shown a win in the face of terrible adversity. Khan wins by technicality only and even then it should have been a void fight.
Barrera took the risk and must suffer for it? What kind of talk is that? We have no idea what was said by the doctor in round 4. For all we know the doctor might have said Barrera would lose by tko if he couldn't continue, we don't know the full situation. At the end of the day that fight was not managed professionally and what should have been a fun fight got tarnished, I'm ashamed by how the fight was managed.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diane
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
If I am not mistaken, the score cards come into effect after the 4th round. It looked like Barrera was given the opportunity, and was probably advised at the time. So the loss is all on Barrera and his team.
It is also the job of the ref, and the ringside doctor, to look out for the best interest of a fighter. When a man has a 3 inch gash on his head, that is spewing blood uncontrollably, then the doctor should be stopping the fight even if the fighter thinks he can continue. What doctor would allow a person that gets a 3 inch cut on his head in the 1st round, to continue fighting, and risking the cut to be ripped open even more? That was an incompetent doctor if you ask me.
Your right! Would they have let him fight on if he was clearly in trouble and taking too much punishment? No chance! Warriors like Barrera will fight to the end regardless, that is why doctors have the power to stop a fight when injuries like this occur. The cut was horrible from the start, the ref took MAB to the doctor for a look and he let the fight go on. The gash needed 33 stitches to close, what doctor would ever say "that's ok he can fight on"
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brucelee
I agree, it should have been a no contest had Barrera decided to quit. However, Barrera did not quit because he wanted to take the risk. Probably thinking that he could TKO khan. Khan did not give him the chance to do that so I give credits to Khan.
Had Barrera incidentally TKoed Khan with a lucky shot, the story would have been different. People would praise him for it and he will be back in the game again. Unfortunately for him, the tide did not go with him. Barrera took the risk and must suffer for it. Credit should be given to Khan.
Do you think ANY fighter should have to fight on with a cut so severe? The ringside doctors have a duty (as does the ref) in protecting a fighter regardless of what he OR his corner want. FACT
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kel
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diane
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
If I am not mistaken, the score cards come into effect after the 4th round. It looked like Barrera was given the opportunity, and was probably advised at the time. So the loss is all on Barrera and his team.
It is also the job of the ref, and the ringside doctor, to look out for the best interest of a fighter. When a man has a 3 inch gash on his head, that is spewing blood uncontrollably, then the doctor should be stopping the fight even if the fighter thinks he can continue. What doctor would allow a person that gets a 3 inch cut on his head in the 1st round, to continue fighting, and risking the cut to be ripped open even more? That was an incompetent doctor if you ask me.
Your right! Would they have let him fight on if he was clearly in trouble and taking too much punishment? No chance! Warriors like Barrera will fight to the end regardless, that is why doctors have the power to stop a fight when injuries like this occur. The cut was horrible from the start, the ref took MAB to the doctor for a look and he let the fight go on. The gash needed 33 stitches to close, what doctor would ever say "that's ok he can fight on"
It's a farce. Barrera was okay to continue in the 4th according to the doctor and yet by the end of the 5th it was suddenly too bad?? It was exactly the same as in the 1st round!!! :rolleyes:
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Jury still out on Hhan!
Fast hands,hard punches,very strong at 135,needs more big fights.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
This is getting funny...
- Barrera himself decided to continue fighting
- The referee/doctor decided to let the fight continue up to the 5th
- But some people (probably MAB fans) screaming for the fight to be stopped after round 1 in order to have a no contest... ;D
Why did the officials in Abraham-Miranda fight let Abraham continue despite a broken jaw?? Why did the officials in Katsidis-Amonsot fight let Katsidis continue despite multiple cuts (i think 5) in his face?? Is it because Abraham/Katsidis were still competitive and winning their respective fights?
There's really no solid basis on when to stop the fight...
.
-
Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
This is getting funny...
- Barrera himself decided to continue fighting
- The referee/doctor decided to let the fight continue up to the 5th
- But some people (probably MAB fans) screaming for the fight to be stopped after round 1 in order to have a no contest... ;D
Why did the officials in Abraham-Miranda fight let Abraham continue despite a broken jaw?? Why did the officials in Katsidis-Amonsot fight let Katsidis continue despite multiple cuts (i think 5) in his face?? Is it because Abraham/Katsidis were still competitive and winning their respective fights?
There's really no solid basis on when to stop the fight...
.
Why did the referee/doctor let the fight continue? so Khan can win. you'd have to be blind to not see that that cut was bad they let him finish, wait about half a round and pulled the plug in order for Khan to get the win.