-
Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
I think they should put this kid up against Alfalfa Gomez.
;D
I had not seen anyone run this much since Floyd Mayweather Jr.
:o
Does anyone have the punch stats? I am dying to see them.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
:biteit:.........I think Hes ready for a Young Mutley myself :cwm13:
A Mosley rematch happening,no doubt!This Cotto, I dont see Berto hanging with.Tonys out.If he splits promotion,who knows
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Isn't Ricky's brother, Matthew Hatton a welterweight?
I would have rather seen him get a crack at Cotto. Woulda made good hype for a future fight with Ricky Hatton.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Is Jennings the best WHO have?
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
So then why is Kell fighting Mark Lloyd?
:-\
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Aww shit, so he ran the whole fight? I had to go to sleep before the fight I'd been up over 26 hours and was totally fucked.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hulk
Isn't Ricky's brother, Matthew Hatton a welterweight?
I would have rather seen him get a crack at Cotto. Woulda made good hype for a future fight with Ricky Hatton.
Yeah Matthew would have give Cotto a good workout I would imagine, he is not too bad to watch.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Jennings was never expected to win this anyway. It was a big step up for him and it showed. The guy deserves credit for giving it a go though. He's obviously no world beater, but very few are. Cotto got his win, no need to gloat over Jennings though. He was in over his head and could have stayed down early, but got up and was sensible to stop when he did. Leave it at that, I say.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kel
Aww shit, so he ran the whole fight? I had to go to sleep before the fight I'd been up over 26 hours and was totally fucked.
He was really on the back foot the first few rounds and just basicly running for dear life and as soon as he got brave, he got cracked and then he folded up like a cheap tent. He got saved by the bell at the end of the 4th which I was hoping would happen and I was hoping he took another few rounds of a beating but like a tent made in Taiwan, he folded up just that quick and he was out of there. in the 5th ;D
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hulk
Isn't Ricky's brother, Matthew Hatton a welterweight?
I would have rather seen him get a crack at Cotto. Woulda made good hype for a future fight with Ricky Hatton.
Jennings is way to skilled for Matthew Hatton, Jennings was basically beaton as soon as the fight was announced just a payday for the english man.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hulk
Isn't Ricky's brother, Matthew Hatton a welterweight?
I would have rather seen him get a crack at Cotto. Woulda made good hype for a future fight with Ricky Hatton.
Jennings is way to skilled for Matthew Hatton, Jennings was basically beaton as soon as the fight was announced just a payday for the english man.
Matthew Hatton is way over rated he was soundly beaton by Craig Watson, Kell Brook Mike jennings and possibly a couple fo others would soundly beat Hatton.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Jennings was never expected to win this anyway. It was a big step up for him and it showed. The guy deserves credit for giving it a go though. He's obviously no world beater, but very few are. Cotto got his win, no need to gloat over Jennings though. He was in over his head and could have stayed down early, but got up and was sensible to stop when he did. Leave it at that, I say.
He tried his best, Mike was only their to make Cotto look good (from a promoters point of few) , he got up for more, the lad came up short like we all expected but no shame in loosing to Cotto.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Danny is such a fucking nut hugger... look at him going off and gloating in this thread.
He wanted to see Cotto beat up a Cherry picked opponent for a few more rounds?... :rolleyes:
Did you think you'd be able to finish off that box of Kleenex?
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
LOL... think that sums it up perfect ;)
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dean Duke
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Jennings was never expected to win this anyway. It was a big step up for him and it showed. The guy deserves credit for giving it a go though. He's obviously no world beater, but very few are. Cotto got his win, no need to gloat over Jennings though. He was in over his head and could have stayed down early, but got up and was sensible to stop when he did. Leave it at that, I say.
He tried his best, Mike was only their to make Cotto look good (from a promoters point of few) , he got up for more, the lad came up short like we all expected but no shame in loosing to Cotto.
Exactly. I think it was more a case of people wishing him well rather than expecting a win. Cotto looked really solid and Jennings stayed in there as long as he could.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Well done Cotto, he looked very well strong last night and he knew exactly how to get to Jennings. Jennings tried his best but when he could barely land his jab and not follow it up with anything it was always going to only end with Cotto stopping him. Jennings style comes from the outside and against opposition not on the elite level it works very well as shown in all of Jennings other fights. I think he showed a lot of heart carrying on and nobody can deny that. Cotto proved he was another level and I hope we can see him in some good fight this year.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Like a Shane rematch think it could of gone either way last time and think Shane can finish the job this time i be rooting for him and as for Margrito well while know this march if he while ever fight again once they annouce what was in his gloves atleast i think it was march when they annoce it.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
I really wish Cotto well especially if that beating Margarito gave him was with loaded wraps, but its a good 1st step to be back in the winners circle..
BUT the true test for Cotto will be when he gets cracked by a good puncher and see if all the demons from the margarito fight dont comeback. As mentioned Jennings was there to boost Cotto's confidence and marketability again, that dude couldnt break an egg, so Miguel knew there was no danger in getting clipped..
Guys like Mosley, Berto and Cintron can hit pretty damn hard and make your life hell.
But lets no overrate this win, congrats Miguel you made a good 1st step back
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
So then why is Kell fighting Mark Lloyd?
:-\
Cuz he's promoted by Frank Warren.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.
Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win ;)
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Id actully like to see Cotto/Collazo would be an intresting matchup, much rather that than him fight Cintron.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.
Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win ;)
LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter. :lolhaha:
If that impresses Danny then so be it :rotflmao:
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.
Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win ;)
LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter. :lolhaha:
If that impresses Danny then so be it :rotflmao:
That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto ;D I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton ;D You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate :lickish: Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.
Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
So then why is Kell fighting Mark Lloyd?
:-\
Because he isn't ranked by the WBO because he is very young still.
Jennings is the best your lot were willing to put Cotto in with after he got chased out of the ring by Margarito.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conrad
Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.
Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid
I hate to say this but there were plenty of people who thought Cotto was done after getting the plaster beat down of his life but.... Oooops.. I guess he is not done. Plenty of people thought Jennings was going to shock the world ;D You don't think Jennings own mom thought he would win? Why did she let him cross the pond then? lol I wont attack you, I will let you guys attack me today because attacking me personally is all you monkeys have left. I will be gloating again when PacMan whips little Ricky and then your monkey ass will really hate me ;D Oh I can't wait. weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
So then why is Kell fighting Mark Lloyd?
:-\
Because he isn't ranked by the WBO because he is very young still.
Jennings is the best your lot were willing to put Cotto in with after he got chased out of the ring by Margarito.
The rematch will be next year, Cotto vs MargaPlaster but this time Phoney Margarita will not have loaded wraps and Margarita will get owned. I can wait as good things come to those who do. ;D
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conrad
Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.
Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid
Oooppss
http://i40.tinypic.com/2vvjls5.png
http://i40.tinypic.com/23sx9qw.png
http://i41.tinypic.com/15yhqw9.png
I can find these all day long. Should I look on this forum too or should we just leave it at that?
;D
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
I wont attack you,
If that's the case bud why did you neg rep me? :confused:
I've never neg repped anyone on here, even Moono and I wont start with you despite your neg rep to me.
The stupid thing about this whole thing is you seem to think everyone on here is against Cotto!! I think you'll find that pretty much everybody here is a Cotto fan, myself included.
The irony of your Cotto nut hugging is that it actually makes people associate what they feel for you with Cotto.
Do yourself (and Cotto) a favour and tone it down. Despite what you found on another forum pretty much everybody knew Jennings would lose. The Uk may not have much to offer at WW but I'm sure we could turn round and say the same about the US and LWW/SMW/LHW/CW etc etc...
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conrad
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
I wont attack you,
If that's the case bud why did you neg rep me? :confused:
I've never neg repped anyone on here, even Moono and I wont start with you despite your neg rep to me.
The stupid thing about this whole thing is you seem to think everyone on here is against Cotto!! I think you'll find that pretty much everybody here is a Cotto fan, myself included.
The irony of your Cotto nut hugging is that it actually makes people associate what they feel for you with Cotto.
Do yourself (and Cotto) a favour and tone it down. Despite what you found on another forum pretty much everybody knew Jennings would lose. The Uk may not have much to offer at WW but I'm sure we could turn round and say the same about the US and LWW/SMW/LHW/CW etc etc...
Ah go lay an egg. ;D
Quote:
Why did you neg rep me I am Conrad poor little me :eek: boo whooo whoo
;D
I am Conrad and I am going to tell Saddo on you because you neg rep because I can call you names but when some one does it to me I snitch on them because they neg rep me boo whoo whhoooooo :eek:
Ah shut your mouth JABRONI!
;D
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.
Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win ;)
LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter. :lolhaha:
If that impresses Danny then so be it :rotflmao:
That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto ;D I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton ;D You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate :lickish: Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.
Come on now. I've never said Jennings would do well. I said he ain't no Gary Lockett and wont embarass himself. And he didn't. He gave his all and fought his heart out. And since when have I criticised Cotto for fighting lesser opponents ? And what has Ricky Hatton got to do with anything, when did I bring him up in this thread ? You constantly bang on about how Margarito cheated in the Cotto fight but says who ? You got no damn evidence whatsoever. Fact is Cotto got knocked the fuck out. And you cant handle it. Your just one biased, bitter guy Danny when it comes to Cotto.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
Oh please Amanda you don't want me to look at which your monkeys said Jennings would win do you? LeftyLee thought Jennings was the real deal ;D
I am not going to waste my time going thru the archives now but we all know some of you monkeys thought that Jennings was going to win. Do me a favor and go lay an egg.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter. :lolhaha:
If that impresses Danny then so be it :rotflmao:
That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto ;D I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton ;D You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate :lickish: Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.
Come on now. I've never said Jennings would do well. I said he ain't no Gary Lockett and wont embarass himself. And he didn't. He gave his all and fought his heart out. And since when have I criticised Cotto for fighting lesser opponents ? And what has Ricky Hatton got to do with anything, when did I bring him up in this thread ? You constantly bang on about how Margarito cheated in the Cotto fight but says who ? You got no damn evidence whatsoever. Fact is Cotto got knocked the fuck out. And you cant handle it. Your just one biased, bitter guy Danny when it comes to Cotto.
Damn you are doing more running than Jennings is ;D
Run Lefty Run!
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
Oh please Amanda you don't want me to look at which your monkeys said Jennings would win do you? LeftyLee thought Jennings was the real deal ;D
I am not going to waste my time going thru the archives now but we all know some of you monkeys thought that Jennings was going to win. Do me a favor and go lay an egg.
Show me a post where I said he's the real deal ?
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
you don't want me to look at which your monkeys said Jennings would win do you?.
I have to ask why you had to use quotes from another forum? Don't try and worm out of how retarded that is
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
LeftyLee thought Jennings was the real deal ;D
he's literally just said otherwise but you're slow so we'll let it slide
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
I am not going to waste my time going thru the archives now
lol... I know, not on here anyway... just on other forums...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
I honestly didn't think his credibility could drop any lower...
Why is he making a statement towards this forum on the grounds of something he has read on another forum ???
know some of you monkeys thought that Jennings was going to win. Do me a favor and go lay an egg.
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...tml#post678112
etc etc etc
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
He's not our best at welter, that would be Kell Brook, but he was clearly the best that Cotto's team were willing to risk him against ;)
So then why is Kell fighting Mark Lloyd?
:-\
Cuz he's promoted by Frank Warren.
And if he wins one more he gets the Lonsdale belt for keeps. Why rush Brook? He looks fucking superb. Let him earn his shot.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Danny, not to distract from this wonderful debate or anything... but I have some questions.
What the hell is 'go and lay an egg mean' supposed to mean? Is it meant to be insulting or is it meant to give off the impression that you're a senile 85 year old who's only company is the litter of cats who's shit she lives in?
Also
How is your understanding of Biology so poor? You keep referring to a group of monkeys and suggesting that they lay eggs?
I'm pretty sure that Mammals can't lay eggs but seeing as your repatoir of insults resembles that of a senile cat lady peppered with liberal use of the word 'fag' I suppose it would be unfair of me to further judge your limited IQ.
-
Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Danny, not to distract from this wonderful debate or anything... but I have some questions.
What the hell is 'go and lay an egg mean' supposed to mean? Is it meant to be insulting or is it meant to give off the impression that you're a senile 85 year old who's only company is the litter of cats who's shit she lives in?
Also
How is your understanding of Biology so poor? You keep referring to a group of monkeys and suggesting that they lay eggs?
I'm pretty sure that Mammals can't lay eggs but seeing as your repatoir of insults resembles that of a senile cat lady peppered with liberal use of the word 'fag' I suppose it would be unfair of me to further judge your limited IQ.
I did not start with the name calling but anyway, there are several mammals that lay eggs and I shall add your monkey ass to that list ;D
Now go lay me some eggs Jabroni.
;D