Printable View
lol... Right ahead of the next US presidential elections. YES!!! lol... A channel had it up and they took them down, but another one has them up for the time being. All brand new InfoWars content for your viewing pleasure.
General Shepherd YouTube channel. lol...GLORY!!! ;D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEyHiX221X8
This feels like a flashback :-X. one clown who has run his course. Gotta find a way to pay the court losses and sanctions off someway I suppose.
Alex Jones? I thought he was sleeping with the fishes courtesy of the Sandy Hook family.
Respect Alex. lol... We need him in a time like this.
;D
He interrupt his guests too too much, screams too too much, and flip flops a lot.
But he gets a lot right.
I personally have no use for someone who makes shit up at will..... (mostly in a psychotic need for attention)..... no matter who he harms.
This is pure entertainment. If you get riled up by Alex then you are the weak, psychotic one. Not him.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThis is pure entertainment. If you get riled up by Alex then you are the weak, psychotic one. Not him.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
I personally don't give a rat's ass about Jones, as I don't follow him. ;)
However..... the parents of the children that died at Sandy Hook might probably have just a wee bit of reason to get riled up by him. Are they "weak and psychotic"?
precisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's actually rich considering the kook had to blame psychosis for railing against dead children. The guys a simpleton based in extremes and wackadoodle horseshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThis is pure entertainment. If you get riled up by Alex then you are the weak, psychotic one. Not him.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICprecisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you
you couldn't even beat grandmaQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICprecisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICyou couldn't even beat grandmaQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICprecisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you
well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she
doesn't matter. you're a pussy fat joeQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICyou couldn't even beat grandmaQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICprecisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you
well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICdoesn't matter. you're a pussy fat joeQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICyou couldn't even beat grandmaQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICprecisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you
well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she
a pussy fat joe stomps a dick every day and twice on sundays
sucks a dick more like. my grandma would out hustle you before you had a heart attack. i would only need to snap my fingers to make you piss yourselfQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICdoesn't matter. you're a pussy fat joeQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICyou couldn't even beat grandmaQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICprecisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocriteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you
well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she
a pussy fat joe stomps a dick every day and twice on sundays
https://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Bo...45_1841700.jpg
Oops.... there you go. You did it again.
I'm afraid your 5 minutes are up.
grandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
she's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
Does she live out in the bush, too? Are you in Western Australia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICshe's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
sorry creepy toucher but i don't want a stalker. we you come over let me know & i can meet you at the airport. i'll taking you huntingQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellDoes she live out in the bush, too? Are you in Western Australia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICshe's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
OK, which airport?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICsorry creepy toucher but i don't want a stalker. we you come over let me know & i can meet you at the airport. i'll taking you huntingQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellDoes she live out in the bush, too? Are you in Western Australia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICshe's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
tell me when you arriveQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellOK, which airport?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICsorry creepy toucher but i don't want a stalker. we you come over let me know & i can meet you at the airport. i'll taking you huntingQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellDoes she live out in the bush, too? Are you in Western Australia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICshe's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellDoes she live out in the bush, too? Are you in Western Australia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICshe's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
Mentions "grandma" a lot. I'd start paying attention to those clues. ;) ;)
Haha are you saying he has a granny fetish... TIC ❤️ gran-granQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellDoes she live out in the bush, too? Are you in Western Australia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TICshe's fit as a fiddle & never had a vaccine in her life. i'd ask her to go easyQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TICgrandma would only need one minuteQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.
Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.
Mentions "grandma" a lot. I'd start paying attention to those clues. ;) ;)
Not sure where my view is on it.
On one hand, censorship isn't good. On the other, if it is a social-media platform, then i see it as a business.
A business has a right to say:
No shoes, no shirt no service.
We serve wedding cakes to he and she, not he and he, or she and she or he-she and ...well U get it.:rolleyes:
YouTube has a right to allow and disallow whoever, whenever, however & conservatives baulk at it IMO because they can't make, build, create on a media platform -they have piss poor ingenuity unlike liberals, from Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Zucker, Karim Hurley & Chen's Ytube.
If they could, they wouldn't give a rat's ass about being censored on youtube. But they haven't so they used there ideology to make it a conspiracy that they are being denied freedom of speech.
On the media overall
Every major news paper always has a dissenting view from their major stories, In Milwaukee it is the Journal-Sentinel and there is a conservative op-ed & a liberal op-ed. So there is no banning or censoring in print media.
There is however a monopoly on radio-media. It disgusts me how incapable liberals are at addressing the disparity of right wing radio station done by repealing laws that prevented monopolization. My point? The Alex Jones of the world aren't denied entrance to radio- conservatives have that on lockdown nationwide.
On major networks that is public television NBC, ABC, CBS & FOX; there has always been anchors that were conservative- but they were awesome at keeping their opinion to themselves & delivering news be it Sam Donaldson, George Will, Tim Russert, Mike Wallace. Public television's news anchors don't really lean either way. But that is my perspective.
today - on cable that is their major focus. Selling ideology FOX on cable tv is biased for conservatism point blank. they are jacktails who inspire limited thinking, partisanship America. On the left they inspire homos, lezbos and low IQ standards.
Rachel Maddow pushes liberalism/progressivism-- & somehow on the right, they affixed cable to regular t.v. Then attach successful businesses like Twitter or YouTube as well & claim they are being denied their right to speak.
That is where I draw the line.
even if Twitter came out and said this is where we stand on politics and who we support: it is their right! Why should they suffer because those who they kick off can turn it political?
I don't like it that YouTube bans those I respect, but I'd rather come up with an alternative and visit that site- then to petition them. And I never could get use to using something called Twitter, sounds so sissified.
Let Alex Jones have his say. Better to know what his kind is saying as opposed to running them underground and having no clue.
Alex Jones should be allowed on YouTube I mean his channel is as accurate as any of the rest of the "news" channels. The Young Turks are on YouTube why? Sam Seder & The Majority Report are on YouTube why? Alex Jones is bombastic and more than a bit of a goofball, but he's harmless as far as "news" goes.
Well, well, well....Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
That's the crux of a lot of these arguments are they a platform or are they a publisher. If they're a platform then the thought is Free Speech applies, if they are a publisher then they're a business and can pick & choose. You see the same with Twitter & Facebook and this is the biggest issue of these companies. If you're a publisher you can be held accountable for what you publish, if you're a platform you're just allowing people a chance to express themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTrae
And?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellWell, well, well....Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
When you said "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick", most of us could SWEAR you'd just done bong hits. So please forgive us for being surprised at your brand new characterizations using words like "bombastic/goofball/harmless".... is it now "Jack jumped over the candlestick", Lyle?Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongThat's the crux of a lot of these arguments are they a platform or are they a publisher. If they're a platform then the thought is Free Speech applies, if they are a publisher then they're a business and can pick & choose. You see the same with Twitter & Facebook and this is the biggest issue of these companies. If you're a publisher you can be held accountable for what you publish, if you're a platform you're just allowing people a chance to express themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTrae
And?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellWell, well, well....Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
"Most of us" meaning the voices in that cavernous melon you call a head?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
Give me your address in North CarolinaQuote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong"Most of us" meaning the voices in that cavernous melon you call a head?Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
National hubris and belief in American exceptionalism have served you badly, Lyle. I have a lesson to teach you.
Get to teaching me thenQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
Ok, Louie.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongGet to teaching me thenQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
So is the lesson starting or ?????Quote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBellOk, Louie.Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongGet to teaching me thenQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
Here is a bit of conspiracy for you: This channel that has been posting Alex Jones's show has not been taken down by YouTube, but the other channel with Alex Jones name to it posting the same videos has been taken down after this original YouTube page was set up.
Now, if Google/YouTube is all about the algorithms, certainly they know this channel- General Shepherd-is posting Alex Jones content.
Seems like banning Alex Jones from the platform is just talk. Piffy talk. ;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Mustard Boy accused others of Tinfoil
Then dove in hook, line and sinker;
To say it was like mixing water and oil
Would be a real stinker!
He came 180 degrees
Like a double-speak Alex:
Came crawling on his knees--
And only spoke in ITALICS.
BWAAAAHHHAHAHAHAHA 🤣🤣🤣
After hearing a few arguments over this, I decided to revisit this thread.
It seems to me that publisher was never a question- until one individual cried about them being denied- aka Drumpf.
From its inception they stated: Twitter is a short burst of inconsequential information. Twitter is a content-enabler, not a publisher neither a distributor. Their business specialized in status updates as a social utility. With restriction as it relates to quantity- 140 characters in 2006, doubled to 280 characters by 2017. But they have also stated it has evolved over time.
If I look at it from its inception- social network and microblogging were the constant terms used to define it.
At some point they launched a music app called Twitter Music for the iPhone. helped broadcasters and rights holders to share video content. Acquired an advertising network for social media stars
it seems the question of what/who they are came about as it appear this current prez used this Twitter for free coverage. No longer a short burst of inconsequential information, rather CONSEQUENTIAL information used by The most influential & powerful office in the world who was now using the site for shit other than what it was intended; now used to push a political agenda. For free at that.
May 26, 2020 the prez issued a statement via tweet related to possible voter fraud via mail. Out of all the means to get this across, again he chose a free platform and got pissed when they took action.
Not only that, but long ago, they gave power to their users; Users can mute other users they do not wish to interact with and block accounts from viewing their tweets. Is that stymying free speech as well?:confused:
As a result of appending something to his page questioning the legitimacy one demographic took issue; his political party and began to raise a word I hadn't seen associated with twitter which is: publisher.
I do acknowledge p.c. magazine also raised the question, but the majority of sites I have seen are conservative leaning like the federalist website- and most of their doubts have begun in the past few years not back in the previous decade (2006-2010)
I understand their need to censorship based on the many lawsuits they've endured from bots to people posting as celebrities, profile collection & even used to organize protests across the globe.
I'd like to think most of this- they never thought would occur from the genesis of wanting inconsequential information in short bursts (140) characters. nevertheless it has happened and among one of the many controversial usage is done by a sitting American president using a social platform to convey his policies, beliefs and even requests to his voters.
I wonder if the prez's supporters consider censorship when In 2016, Twitter cooperated with the Israeli government to remove content originating outside of their country. Or was it necessary then?
Payin' the cost to be the boss!
They have received legal demands from 47 countries and counting.
Again from it's beginnings: Fans of twitters said nothing about it being a publisher, rather they saw it as a good way to keep in touch with busy friends.- [sidenote] which is why it took years for me to get an account- All I read back then were people saying at 8am they are about to take a dump.:LOS: About to leave the house for a hot date :date: (so rob my house blind!;D)
In its infancy stages several high profile techys not only didnt see it as a publisher, but deemed that any form of "literate communication" was about as likely as firing up a CB radio and hearing some guy recite the Iliad.
Several firms gave their take on the content -which seems to qualify under everything but publisher, Per wiki they are listed as:
1. Pointless babble 2. conversational babble. 3. Pass-along value 4. self-promotion 5. spam 6. news
Yet from 2006 to present it has been used to promote not just small biz, but politicians and most of all the prez whose reading attention span suits 140-280 characters just fine. Now faced with international Twitter diplomacy- where a sitting prez uses it to pass judgment of events regarding allies and his enemies. 4,474 this year & counting.
Personally I'd call the prez's tweets as pointless babble. But because it has power and his minions act on it- it becomes a political platform with consequences---meaning his voters react to what they're reading be it voting wise, boycotting or possibly kicking' somebody in the ass.'
Alex Jones on the tail of the Sandy Hooks debacle- saw the people take him to court, not Twitter to court, they understood it was a platform being used by one who had as many as 5 million listeners who were told the school shooting was manufactured by actors
https://youtu.be/Q1Nn0Z55lSw
One whose message is so volatile- those who spoke up against Jones conspiracy were faced with death threats. Even this prez has followers who also beat people the fuck up, kids included and say he told us to. Death threats included.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ded/ar-AAH2ONq
Trump accidentally tweeted an insult at a pastor. Here’s how the pastor responded.
The “drive-by tweet” brought on “intense vitriol and hatred,” He was suddenly experiencing what many of Trump’s intended Twitter targets go through almost daily: a barrage of infuriated tweets from Trump’s followers.
The pastor stopped laughing. And published an open letter to Trump.
“Although I was an accidental casualty caught in the cross-fire of your ‘lightweight’ tweet, your attack was very purposeful and hurtful. Many others, whether American citizens or global citizens, feel wounded and hurt by the shrapnel and side-effects of your ongoing Twitter attacks. Your heart must be in a dangerous place to have such a consistent flow of defamation and disrespect towards so many,”
-- Rev. Jonathan Carl
https://youtu.be/eYDJOKh-uLA
Montana man claims Trump's rhetoric inspired him to assault boy over National Anthem
I understand why Twitter is under duress, they have a jacktail running America who can inspire hate, physical violence and so called freedom of speech givers (Alex) whom have both caused harm, all by the means of a tweet.
Trump threatens to 'close' down social media platforms after Twitter fact checks claims on mail-in voting fraud
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...ry?id=70899912