Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 60 of 60

Thread: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Mike Tyson.

    If he were a 6ft 4 hulking mass of muscle, he'd be Frank Bruno.
    bruno is thelb4lb best heavyweight of all time
    He's one of the heaviest with one of the shortest reigns
    what are you on about?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    atleast have the balls to demand the 80% that Fury does.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    atleast have the balls to demand the 80% that Fury does.
    That's the whole point demanding 80% shows he has no balls.
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeanz View Post
    Granted at 6 foot 7 is very tall . Your argument does not hold up to much scrutiny.
    bullshit. Michael Granted was 6 foot 8. Now you are subtracting an inch.

    p.s. Beanz. Those Fury clips prove shite mate, in the 2nd clip yes Fury goes down at 545 but he almost knocks out his opponent at 6:07. He reovered fast and held on due to his gargantuan size. Then lands a wicked overhand right. He only survived for his size, hanging on and clutching and smothering. Thats another thing a huge guy can do when hurt---clutch and smother and grab, the oppoent cannot even bee seen he is totally covered up as if by a giant squid.

    Joe Frazier had nowhere to clutch and hold when Foreman batted him about the ring in '73. He was too small. Lewis could clutch and hold with his huge arms until he recovered, like Fury did in both of your clips.

    Mentioning Joe Frazier and Tyson Fury in the same thread is heinous enough. The same post is really pushing it. The same paragraph is almost unforgivable. Anyone else and I would have put myself on ignore. I am now going off to cry into my whiskey.
    Oh please. Such melodrama. "heinous", "unforgivable", "ignore", "cry", "whiskey"....

    Beanz you could be a script writer for a Korean drama. They make mountains out of mole hills over there!
    It's called flair darling. I am an artist and I demand my 10%
    atleast have the balls to demand the 80% that Fury does.
    That's the whole point demanding 80% shows he has no balls.
    but he has flair

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Fury has no flair. He isn't tough. He can't speak English and he was born in England. He has no respect for anybody past or present in boxing and had to put a cruiserweight into a headlock to knock him out. In his case size is all he has. Having said that he may still be about to get ktfo by a much smaller man.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,052
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2261
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    I think ' a good big un usually beats a good small un'

    Throughout history, there have been heavyweights who's main claim to fame (or success) has been their size: James J Jeffries, Primo Carnera, Buddy Baer, just to name a few old timers and to show that this debate isn't new.

    In an unlimited weight class, of course the bigger guy has the advantage.

    If Tyson Fury was not a whopping 6'8'', I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be undefeated by now.

    Having said that, it does mean that people like Jack Dempsey, Rocky Marciano, Floyd Patterson, Joe Frazier and Mike Tyson should get perhaps even more credit by being the exceptions that prove the rule
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

  8. #53
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Vitali.. Vitali uses his height as a defensive mechanism as he leans back to avoid punches but without his height and reach, this would have been impossible for him. So yea, I pick Vitali as one of the guy who wouldnt have been what he is without his size..

    Wlad on the other hand. I think he would have done well without his size due to his intelligence and boxing skills...

  9. #54
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
    Vitali.. Vitali uses his height as a defensive mechanism as he leans back to avoid punches but without his height and reach, this would have been impossible for him. So yea, I pick Vitali as one of the guy who wouldnt have been what he is without his size..

    Wlad on the other hand. I think he would have done well without his size due to his intelligence and boxing skills...
    Vitali's boxing style was born out of kickboxing...granted his height might give him the advantage to lean out of the way of punches better than most, but honestly he just sees punches coming so well he's hard to hit in general.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
    Vitali.. Vitali uses his height as a defensive mechanism as he leans back to avoid punches but without his height and reach, this would have been impossible for him. So yea, I pick Vitali as one of the guy who wouldnt have been what he is without his size..

    Wlad on the other hand. I think he would have done well without his size due to his intelligence and boxing skills...
    Vitali's boxing style was born out of kickboxing...granted his height might give him the advantage to lean out of the way of punches better than most, but honestly he just sees punches coming so well he's hard to hit in general.
    That is true and you have to remember at 79 inches Vitalis reach is shorter than most other Heavys, including guys like Ali who people just assume would not be able to compete today. When guys are trying to kick you in the head you develop good defences pretty quickly and though often that does not translate to making you a natural boxer there are exceptions and ways of building on that fighting foundation. At the other end of the Scale tiny Scott Quigg has a background in martial arts and it has definitely helped hone his reflexes, but he has built on that with great boxing specific footwork and punch picking skills. You play to your strengths but if you want to be great you can not let them define you. You have to become well rounded and bring your deficiencies up a level. Being huge but slow and clumsy is not gonna help just as being small quick but fundamentally unbalanced and easy to outwork will not win you belts.
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    can Marciano even REACH Vitali's chin with his 67 inch reach? Seriously let's do the math.

    Marciano was 5 ft 10, so he could reach up about 20 inches from the shoulder joint ---
    therefore if he threw a completely vertical overhand looping right, standing toe to toe with Vitali, his fist would be about 10 inches over his head. 5 ft 10 is 70 inches plus 10 inches is about 80 inches or 6 ft 8 inches. SO YES I suppose he could reach their chins.......

    but who the fuck throws a completely vertical overhand right? and how is Marciano seriously going to land that punch on Vitali?
    Last edited by brocktonblockbust; 07-06-2013 at 03:00 PM.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    can Marciano even REACH Vitali's chin with his 67 inch reach? Seriously let's do the math.

    Marciano was 5 ft 10, so he could reach up about 20 inches from the shoulder joint ---
    therefore if he threw a completely vertical overhand looping right, standing toe to toe with Vitali, his fist would be about 10 inches over his head. 5 ft 10 is 70 inches plus 10 inches is about 80 inches or 6 ft 8 inches. SO YES I suppose he could reach their chins.......

    but who the fuck throws a completely vertical overhand right? and how is Marciano seriously going to land that punch on Vitali?
    Maciano is never going to have to try and land that hand. Marciano is also one of the most atypical heavyweights of all time. Even back in the day most fighters were not 5ft 10 and had a longer than 67 inch reach. I don't really rate Marciano anyway


    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Rock would of been crushed by a lot of heavyweights after the late 60's i think by to days rules he could be a cw or lhw in which he would be great. Saying that if he was a heavy weight these days he would have to put on 20 pounds and probably lose to top ten fighter and get crushed by the brothers.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV USA
    Posts
    659
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    683
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Jameel McCline
    Paolo Vidoz
    Diego Corrales RIP
    Seth Mitchell
    Antonio Margarito
    Bruce Seldon (muscle)
    Dale Crow
    Tyson Fury
    Vernon Forrest
    Joe Mesi

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,052
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2261
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxers who you think would NOT have been so great if not for their size

    Vitali is a tough tough man ........ but Marciano would have butted him, he would have punched his hips and hit his balls, he would have rubbed his laces in his face during clinches, he would have stamped on his toes and hit his kidneys and the back of his head.

    People felt they had been in a scrap after they had been in the ring with Marciano.
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. TOP 3 COUNTRIES WITH GREAT BOXERS
    By brucelee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 05:32 AM
  2. Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 12:58 AM
  3. End of the Road for Four Great Boxers...
    By ArawakWarria in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-28-2007, 04:35 AM
  4. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 04:48 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-04-2006, 07:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing