Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 78

Thread: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    928
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Pac deserves 90% because hatton bores me to death.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    SJC
    Posts
    133
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    981
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Blah blah blah blah blah.....

    Make this fight happen already!

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bartlett, Illinois
    Posts
    845
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1229
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

    Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Blackpool
    Posts
    772
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    988
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    tell you what would make this simple, winner gets 60%, 40% to the looser...
    dont Fuck with the chuck

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Maybe Arum should get off his ass and get a counter offer 55/45. Else let Hatton have 60/40 UK PPV and Pacquiao 60/40 US PPV or go 100% UK Hatton and 100% US Pacquiao.

    I think there is more negotiating left here, so I'm getting off this roller coaster cause I just want to see the fight.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    I can't see any reason to justify Pac claiming 60%

    He's not the one with the title.
    I don't believe he's the bigger draw.
    He's actually more accustomed to fighting in the U.S. than Hatton.


    If Pac wants 60% he should put on a championship stake, the winner walks away with 60% the loser 40%
    Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?
    He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

    It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

    Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.
    091

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1084
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    I can't see any reason to justify Pac claiming 60%

    He's not the one with the title.
    I don't believe he's the bigger draw.
    He's actually more accustomed to fighting in the U.S. than Hatton.


    If Pac wants 60% he should put on a championship stake, the winner walks away with 60% the loser 40%
    Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?
    He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

    It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

    Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

    hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?
    He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

    It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

    Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

    hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?
    I think everything about this fight is 50-50 so the purse should be too IMO!

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by KananKrus View Post
    Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

    Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177
    That fat cunt has a serious problem with Brits.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Montreal/Canada
    Posts
    644
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1225
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by gudnite vienna View Post
    tell you what would make this simple, winner gets 60%, 40% to the looser...
    So you agree with 60% for Pacquiao
    Quote Originally Posted by awdleyfuturehalloffamer View Post
    Pac deserves 90% because hatton bores me to death.
    May I bid ?!?
    Pacquiao: 91%

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bartlett, Illinois
    Posts
    845
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1229
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KananKrus View Post
    Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

    Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177
    That fat cunt has a serious problem with Brits.
    Do you know why Mike Marley of boxingconfidential, has a serious problem with the British? How and when did that start?

    It would be nice for you to let everybody know as to why. It will make his views biased if so! Then I wouldn't wanna read up on him if that is the case.

    Calling the guy the female reproductive tract, is not convincing enough as an exhibit A! Please feel free to reinforce you claim with facts! Likewise a cleaned up argument, is a lot clearer to understand. Be advised, that keeping this post as wholesome as possible, is within you!
    Last edited by KananKrus; 01-19-2009 at 04:35 PM.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?
    He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

    It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

    Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

    hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?
    Pacquaio beat a version of De la Hoya.
    A faded, weight drained, decade past prime De la Hoya.

    So although it is imprssive to rise from Superfeatherweight and beat a Welter in one year, he doesn't get the full merit.
    091

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Sorry for Hatton fans,and I am one,it really comes down to who has the heat in the US,and right now,thats Pac
    60-40 is actually reasonable,he'll be selling 60% of the US buys on the PPV

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by KananKrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KananKrus View Post
    Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

    Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
    http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177
    That fat cunt has a serious problem with Brits.
    Do you know why Mike Marley of boxingconfidential, has a serious problem with the British? How and when did that start?

    It would be nice for you to let everybody know as to why. It will make his views biased if so! Then I wouldn't wanna read up on him if that is the case.

    Calling the guy the female reproductive tract, is not convincing enough as an exhibit A! Please feel free to reinforce you claim with facts! Likewise a cleaned up argument, is a lot clearer to understand. Be advised, that keeping this post as wholesome as possible, is within you!
    I've never read ANYTHING by him that hasn't been negative towards the Brit.

    I understand his style is clearly to be OBNOXIOUS.

    He is fat. Fact.

    Therefore a FAT CUNT from my perspective
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1084
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

    It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

    Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

    hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?

    Pacquaio beat a version of De la Hoya.
    A faded, weight drained, decade past prime De la Hoya.

    So although it is imprssive to rise from Superfeatherweight and beat a Welter in one year, he doesn't get the full merit.
    since ive started posting here every person pacquiao beats is faded, weight drained and past his prime. before the dela hoya fight everybody here thought pac was gonna get ktfo. now that he beat dela hoya, oscar is now faded and past his prime. so i guess those guys he beat get 50% of the credit because they were there to be hit and they had a hard time to catch pacquiao? give pac 50% credit coz he executed his game plan to win? seriously, besides mayweather, odlh who can hatton fight that his cut will be bigger than what he will get with pac at 40% split?
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. POLL: De la hoya - Pacquiao
    By neverscared in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-14-2008, 05:48 AM
  2. Breaking News:Team Pacquiao agreeing at 65-35 share!
    By Panadzzz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 09:47 AM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-29-2008, 02:22 PM
  4. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 06:28 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-26-2007, 05:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing