Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 76

Thread: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Unacceptable behavior, huh? I'm sure it is. But guess what? I been here longer than you. And while I probably should of been ban for life a long time ago, it hasn't happened.
    Use Flip one more time and we'll test that boast VD.

    Get this back on track or its gone, as will you be.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Yep, Flip is a derogatory racial term. Since when has this forum allowed such? If nothing is done about this, it may give the readers the impression that certain derogatory racial remarks are allowed in here.
    Can you explain how it is a derogatory racial term? I'm not trying to take the piss, but the only explanation I've ever heard was that it means crazy or something in your language. I'm not trying to take the piss here, I am actually curious as to the etymology behind the word?

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    The problem is a quite simple one. I know more than you. A substantial more.
    I doubt it.

    I probably been watching boxing longer than you are alive

    verifiable : I registered here 2 yrs ahead of you



    You said Pac was suppose to get more than $2M for the Marquez rematch?

    Are you backing off now and admit that you will type anything just to fuck around? Where did you get the $2M?

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post

    Can you explain how it is a derogatory racial term? I'm not trying to take the piss, but the only explanation I've ever heard was that it means crazy or something in your language. I'm not trying to take the piss here, I am actually curious as to the etymology behind the word?
    Here in the Philippines. 'Flip' means someone who became Psychiatrically ill because of drugs.

    Im not sure how they define it in the US or anywhere else.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Do we really need to know what it means? I didnt know so have had to look it up, I dont have a definitive answer for you, its a word that is offensive in certain context and when said by certain people, much like any other 'euphemism' that denotes colour or race(didnt find Miron Langs definition of it)
    Some people have taken offence to its use here so thats all we need to know.
    Last edited by Memphis; 12-01-2010 at 11:07 AM.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Do we really need to know what it means? I didnt know so have had to look it up, I dont have a definitive answer for you, its a word that is offensive in certain context and when said by certain people, much like any other 'euphemism' that denotes colour or race(didnt find Miron Langs definition of it)
    Some people have taken offence to its use here so thats all we need to know.
    Let's face it, just because people take offence doesn't mean it is necessarily racist, so I wanted to know what it meant as I couldn't find anything that really explained why.

    I take offence to things people say on here in context of my own 'race', but I just generally ignore it, because most times people don't realize they're doing it and it's not maliciously intended (I'm not saying whether VD's is or not). Anyway I was curious as to how this term was racially derogatory, whether it was something the Spanish used to use or something.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Do we really need to know what it means? I didnt know so have had to look it up, I dont have a definitive answer for you, its a word that is offensive in certain context and when said by certain people, much like any other 'euphemism' that denotes colour or race(didnt find Miron Langs definition of it)
    Some people have taken offence to its use here so thats all we need to know.
    Let's face it, just because people take offence doesn't mean it is necessarily racist, so I wanted to know what it meant as I couldn't find anything that really explained why.

    I take offence to things people say on here in context of my own 'race', but I just generally ignore it, because most times people don't realize they're doing it and it's not maliciously intended (I'm not saying whether VD's is or not). Anyway I was curious as to how this term was racially derogatory, whether it was something the Spanish used to use or something.
    I think VD's acceptance that it was or is unacceptable is proof enough that it wasnt said in jest. Agreed we cant stamp on everything that someone takes offence at, but if its race or colour we have to do something, its one of two lines you dont cross here.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  8. #53
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    968
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    If the word Flip is offensive, then let's not use it. I'm guessing it would be like using the word Paki. I'm thinking some people might think it's a shorten word for that particular nationality, but to the group of people of that nationality it's considered to be derogatory. Now I've been guilty of also using the word Flip, but I thought it was just a shorten word for Filipino. But hey if it's a racial slur then let's just back off of it, simple as.

    To get back on topic, whatever the reason behind why JMM didn't take the rematch in '05 with Pac. All I know is that Ouma was right when he said it's like cutting off your nose to spite your face, for I seriously doubt that the fight with John and the other 2 guys he fought before John would total more than 750k for the Pac rematch. Looking at it now, it was a poor financial decision. And I still don't understand why JMM's team didn't push for the JOhn fight to be on neutral ground.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Do we really need to know what it means? I didnt know so have had to look it up, I dont have a definitive answer for you, its a word that is offensive in certain context and when said by certain people, much like any other 'euphemism' that denotes colour or race(didnt find Miron Langs definition of it)
    Some people have taken offence to its use here so thats all we need to know.
    Let's face it, just because people take offence doesn't mean it is necessarily racist, so I wanted to know what it meant as I couldn't find anything that really explained why.

    I take offence to things people say on here in context of my own 'race', but I just generally ignore it, because most times people don't realize they're doing it and it's not maliciously intended (I'm not saying whether VD's is or not). Anyway I was curious as to how this term was racially derogatory, whether it was something the Spanish used to use or something.
    I think VD's acceptance that it was or is unacceptable is proof enough that it wasnt said in jest. Agreed we cant stamp on everything that someone takes offence at, but if its race or colour we have to do something, its one of two lines you dont cross here.
    I agree, I guess its just that I've seen people display attitudes that are far more racist than what VD just said, but because they don't use a slur or they hide it behind some 'hypothetical scenario', it kind of goes unchecked. But that's life, it's not that I really care that much, but I wanted to know if it was actually a racial slur or a kind of 'you people' thing

    What's the other thing? I'm assuming it's a Lefty-style full on assault on someone's family??

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Racist stuff and liking Audley Harrison. Anything else fill your boots.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    If the word Flip is offensive, then let's not use it. I'm guessing it would be like using the word Paki. I'm thinking some people might think it's a shorten word for that particular nationality, but to the group of people of that nationality it's considered to be derogatory. Now I've been guilty of also using the word Flip, but I thought it was just a shorten word for Filipino. But hey if it's a racial slur then let's just back off of it, simple as.

    To get back on topic, whatever the reason behind why JMM didn't take the rematch in '05 with Pac. All I know is that Ouma was right when he said it's like cutting off your nose to spite your face, for I seriously doubt that the fight with John and the other 2 guys he fought before John would total more than 750k for the Pac rematch. Looking at it now, it was a poor financial decision. And I still don't understand why JMM's team didn't push for the JOhn fight to be on neutral ground.
    I think the difference there is that word has a far greater background which is clear. It was used for anyone from the Indian sub-continent and certainly in the UK, had a history of violence associated with it (see paki-bashing). Point being is that it's easy to trace why it is offensive.

    Anyway back on topic, I do believe that JMM had every reason not to accept the rematch as Arum was shafting him as laid out earlier, but choosing to go to Indonesia for that kind of money was idiotic. Beristain should stick to training, I'm amazed he was kept on as manager after that

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Racist stuff and liking Audley Harrison. Anything else fill your boots.
    Audley is great, how can you not love that delusional buffoon??!



    Go to 2:20 - "My name is Audley, my name is Audley, Audley money..."

    In all seriousness, away from pro boxing, I've got more time for him based on how he is as a person. He always looks to help out the Repton, and gave them dozens of free tickets to the Haye fight, and does go back there. Point being, even though he's shit & fights like a blind turtle, he hasn't forgot where he came from. In contrast, Haye doesn't do shit for Fitzroy Lodge where I box, except asks his brother to tell people (media) that he's always about helping the young fighters. Anyway, enough about Haye before Lyle steams in like a b*tch in heat

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    831
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Yep, Flip is a derogatory racial term. Since when has this forum allowed such? If nothing is done about this, it may give the readers the impression that certain derogatory racial remarks are allowed in here.
    Can you explain how it is a derogatory racial term? I'm not trying to take the piss, but the only explanation I've ever heard was that it means crazy or something in your language. I'm not trying to take the piss here, I am actually curious as to the etymology behind the word?
    Here is the etymology of that term:

    Flip (slang) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I hope this answers your question.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1451
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    You know how SOME African-American people call each other "nigger" and MOST of them are not offended by it?... but it's only a big deal when other color call them nigger?...

    Well, it's kinda the same way to us (Filipino) with the word "Flip". Do you guys get what I'm saying?

    "Flip" to me is only equivalent of "Beaner". But calling someone "gook" or "wetback"... now that's real racial IMO.

  15. #60
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: So why did JMM fight Chris John for 30k instead of Pac for 750k in '05?

    Quote Originally Posted by jdonaher1 View Post
    I think anybody complaining Marquez was robbed in the John fight might actually want to go watch it first. There was no way he was robbed. It was a close, hard to score fight that could have gone either way. That's not getting robbed.
    I've seen the fight JMM did not deserve to have points taken away, clearly the ref was biased. And despite all that he still deserved to win, infact the only fight i thought JMM lost is the one with Floyd Mayweather Jr, but that was at a weightclass he isn't comfortable at.

    But his other losses against John, Pacquiao, Norwood, i thought he won them all. JMM certainly has been hard done by in his career, and if he didn't move up in weight with a huge disadvantage against Floyd Mayweather Jr, and he would of got the decision in all those fights i mentioned above. Which i think he should have, he would be P4P number 1 IMO. And would have been seen as probably the best of this decade or atleast 2nd best, but now he has to live in the shadows against the likes of Mayweather, Pacquiao, which isn't fair.

    Because JMM doesn't need to talk shit or ETC, he just fights the best and lets his fists do the talking.
    Last edited by ICB; 12-01-2010 at 03:58 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Robert Guerrero to fight Chris John
    By markb018 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-13-2009, 12:01 AM
  2. Rafa vs Chris John!
    By Julius Rain in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 08:13 AM
  3. Seen Chris John vs. Rocky Juarez Fight?
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-03-2009, 11:51 PM
  4. Chris John
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-27-2007, 08:37 PM
  5. chris john
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-08-2006, 02:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing